Woodlouse
Well-Known Member
do you look back and admire your boat whilst rowing away from her?
No. When rowing I look back to see where I'm going.
do you look back and admire your boat whilst rowing away from her?
Very pretty hull, but he might have spent another half hour on the coachroof?
Ducks!!!!!!
Agreed, that is a hideous coach roof, it's just a block on top with block windowsDefinitely function over form. There are so many examples out there with sleek coach roofs and pretty windows that are in proportion.)
In fact I like a nice arse on my boat too!
I agree that it is functional but it is certainly not hideous (have you seen the current range of Beneteaus or the new fat Elans), it is very 'American'; I just don't think it matches the quality of the lines of the hull, but the forward facing window must be nice when you look forward from the chart table. However it matches the tradition of American east coast yacht design very well indeed
Its great the way these threads celebrate the great British traditional boat building industry, it is so successful! Just compare it to the struggling French and German manufactures, who have got it sooooo wrong, havent they?![]()
Very pretty hull, but he might have spent another half hour on the coachroof?
Ducks!!!!!!
Agreed, that is a hideous coach roof, it's just a block on top with block windowsDefinitely function over form. There are so many examples out there with sleek coach roofs and pretty windows that are in proportion.
I agree that it is functional but it is certainly not hideous (have you seen the current range of Beneteaus or the new fat Elans), it is very 'American'; I just don't think it matches the quality of the lines of the hull, but the forward facing window must be nice when you look forward from the chart table. However it matches the tradition of American east coast yacht design very well indeed
It's a good job we all like different things but I was very worried last week when my friend said he thought E-Type Jags were "hideous"![]()
I love it when these threads degrade into just slagging off people that don't sail all the time, even in a F5-6 on the nose because "we did and we thoroughly enjoyed it".
In the last 4 months, SWMBO and I have sailed 775 miles (that's an average of 6.25 miles a day).
Does this make us good people or bad people?
We have done it in a 1983 Beneteau First 30E.
Does this make us good people or bad people?
We have motored for 27.7% of the time that we have been moving.
Does this make us good people or bad people?
But, more importantly, we have been living on the boat for 4 months (1 more to go). Meeting people, going to places we have never been to before, seeing things we have never seen before. Earning our daily crust (from the boat, using Wifi & 3G dongles) and generally chilling out in a way that it would appear many on this forum are unable to do if you take the high-octane, high blood pressure posts that a lot of you guys seem to make.
WTF does it matter if we're motoring sometimes when we could be sailing. Why is there such snobbery about it.
Mine's a **** AWB. I motor. Who cares. I can sail when I want to and I do.
<Sticky out tongue smiley>
It would be torture... I mean they look uncomfortable in the picture fer chrissakes!
The 'stylish' boats you mention are all Scandanavian but you could also have added some of the Dehlers. But there is a downside; (I sail a Finngulf) the volume is much less below as the hull is an awful lot slimmer, while our 33' boat can sleep 6, it would be quite a squeeze, we have to keep folding down the table leaves to get about. The max. beam, freeboard and coachroof width is selected for performance rather than comfort below. You do get a high aspect keel stepped rig and sparkling performance but I reckon a 34' Dufour or Beneteau has more space than the Finngulf 37.
It is a different story on deck and in the cockpit though, and once you get going, with fantastic comfort, speed and handleability so the choice depends on how much time you spend out on the water and how many you want to sleep.
Would not change her because I enjoy sailing her so much, though sometimes I still yearn for our old Sigma 38, on it we had a cabin for the dog, just as much speed in most conditions and a lot more money in the bank. Trading down on size without losing performance was expensive and once you have had a certain amount of space you tend to miss it more than I expected; perhaps we should have gone for a Moody?
Is not only ugly... but disfunctional... could you imagine a 6 hour beat to windward in a typical UK grey rainy day in that cockpit??
It would be torture... I mean they look uncomfortable in the picture fer chrissakes!
The final ones were horrible, and even the early ones are unspeakably vulgar, in my book. The coupés are just about OK: the 2+2s should be rounded up and crushed for offences to aesthetics.