boatone
Well-known member
Well, the EA "consultation" closes tonight and much good may it do us all - but I doubt it. The questions were ill considered - in fact the whole exercise was something of a farce. Of the 15 questions the first 7 were all preamble info about the status of the respondent so no value contribution there.
Q8 asked us if we agree we need to pay more - do turkeys vote for Xmas?
Q9 asked us if we agreed with the increase itself - see above re Q8.
Q10 is a blatant attempt to point out to us that the registration fee is a relatively minor element within the overall cost of boat ownership - but didn't point out that cost against delivery is an important aspect of anything we pay for.
Q!! - Would the increases make me leave or give up boating? Leave -NO, I'm most unlikely to take the boat elsewhere. Give up boating? At my age thats a foregone conclusion in the not too distant future but they may hasten the day.
Q12 - Ah yes, if we don't have enough money we can't give you everything you want so please rank an ill-considered list of issues so that the EA can tell us we decided what was important. I wanted to rank at least 5 as Priority 1 but not possible.
Q13 - Tell them how we think they could raise more money. Collect the money from those that are evading payment would be a good start - must be at least half a million quid a year there for starters. £1 per premises supplied with water by Thames Water seems a pretty petty sum to contribute for their raw material - that would bring in over £12million a year and nobody would even notice.
Q14 Do you feel confident that the Environment Agency is working to secure a sustainable funding future for the waterways we manage? `NO - that was easy wasn't it ?
Q15 We really value your feedback on our proposals. Please tell us if you have any further comments and provide as much information as possible to support your answer.
Part of my response - There is no doubt that the EA is the responsible authority for the management and funding of the river. At present I see little evidence that they are getting to grips with the problems facing a much loved and valued waterway.
Thanks and goodnight.
Oh, before I go - Did YOU submit a response to the proposal?
Oh yes - and this is Boatone posting this.
Q8 asked us if we agree we need to pay more - do turkeys vote for Xmas?
Q9 asked us if we agreed with the increase itself - see above re Q8.
Q10 is a blatant attempt to point out to us that the registration fee is a relatively minor element within the overall cost of boat ownership - but didn't point out that cost against delivery is an important aspect of anything we pay for.
Q!! - Would the increases make me leave or give up boating? Leave -NO, I'm most unlikely to take the boat elsewhere. Give up boating? At my age thats a foregone conclusion in the not too distant future but they may hasten the day.
Q12 - Ah yes, if we don't have enough money we can't give you everything you want so please rank an ill-considered list of issues so that the EA can tell us we decided what was important. I wanted to rank at least 5 as Priority 1 but not possible.
Q13 - Tell them how we think they could raise more money. Collect the money from those that are evading payment would be a good start - must be at least half a million quid a year there for starters. £1 per premises supplied with water by Thames Water seems a pretty petty sum to contribute for their raw material - that would bring in over £12million a year and nobody would even notice.
Q14 Do you feel confident that the Environment Agency is working to secure a sustainable funding future for the waterways we manage? `NO - that was easy wasn't it ?
Q15 We really value your feedback on our proposals. Please tell us if you have any further comments and provide as much information as possible to support your answer.
Part of my response - There is no doubt that the EA is the responsible authority for the management and funding of the river. At present I see little evidence that they are getting to grips with the problems facing a much loved and valued waterway.
Thanks and goodnight.
Oh, before I go - Did YOU submit a response to the proposal?
Oh yes - and this is Boatone posting this.