Expected Resistance of VHF Cable?

Refueler

Well-known member
Joined
13 Sep 2008
Messages
17,672
Location
Far away from hooray henrys
Visit site
My Icom AIS has a diagnostic that includes antenna. If you have a set with similar facilities swop the antenna leads to check the VHF antenna - assuming of course that you have sufficient slack in the antenna leads to allow them to be easily exchanged.

Post #9 ......

The main item to make sure is that antenna is direct connected to VHF and not through any splitter .... splitters cause diagnostic to fail.
 

Ian_Rob

Well-known member
Joined
31 Jan 2008
Messages
1,123
Visit site
I hope the weather is kind to you and you sort your problems out easil
I hope the weather is kind to you and you sort your problems out easily.
Thanks very much indeed. We are next but one to launch at or about 10.30. Not too bad so far but we need to get the boat out to our swinging mooring and dinghy back before it gets too bad.
 

samfieldhouse

Active member
Joined
18 Sep 2016
Messages
125
Visit site
The cable supplied with the Hawk Aerial - RG58 C/U.
The VHFs I've installed recently from Standard Horizon and Garmin, in their instructions state that the maximum run of RG58 is 8 meters. On my 28ft boat the run from VHF to mast head was around 18m.
It would seem that RG58 will do, but that RG8x is better.
 

Refueler

Well-known member
Joined
13 Sep 2008
Messages
17,672
Location
Far away from hooray henrys
Visit site
The VHFs I've installed recently from Standard Horizon and Garmin, in their instructions state that the maximum run of RG58 is 8 meters. On my 28ft boat the run from VHF to mast head was around 18m.
It would seem that RG58 will do, but that RG8x is better.

There's actually a Recc'd table of lengths online for VHF cables and the losses incurred etc. Google picks it up easy.

But at end of day - many people use 58 and survive .... usually because its easier to work with ..
 

samfieldhouse

Active member
Joined
18 Sep 2016
Messages
125
Visit site
But at end of day - many people use 58 and survive .... usually because its easier to work with ..

Oddly, I chose RG8x because it was easier to work with - Glomex's system has small diameter pre attached terminals so the routing holes are nice and small and there's a stronger connection at the mast head.
 

Refueler

Well-known member
Joined
13 Sep 2008
Messages
17,672
Location
Far away from hooray henrys
Visit site
Oddly, I chose RG8x because it was easier to work with - Glomex's system has small diameter pre attached terminals so the routing holes are nice and small and there's a stronger connection at the mast head.


Maybe I have wrong way round .... I know that the 3 recc'd cable types get harder/ stiffer and slightly larger diameter each step up ...
 

st599

Well-known member
Joined
9 Jan 2006
Messages
7,237
Visit site
Maybe I have wrong way round .... I know that the 3 recc'd cable types get harder/ stiffer and slightly larger diameter each step up ...
Not sure a hawk can use a different type of cable, it's got a centre pin that pushes in to the centre conductor as you wind in a plastic nut. Works well, once.
 

Martin_J

Well-known member
Joined
19 Apr 2006
Messages
4,257
Location
Portsmouth, UK
Visit site
The VHFs I've installed recently from Standard Horizon and Garmin, in their instructions state that the maximum run of RG58 is 8 meters. On my 28ft boat the run from VHF to mast head was around 18m.
It would seem that RG58 will do, but that RG8x is better.
After you've got to about 8m length, you've probably lost about 30% of your signal strength. By the time you get to 12m of RG58 you could be closer to 45% loss..

So it's not a hard cut off at 8m, just a diminishing signal strength.

I know you're not racing, but it can be nice to be guided by the Offshore Special Regulations, which specifies a co-axial feeder with no more than 40% power loss to be used, so it's likely neither of those cable types would meet their requirement (unless you have a very short mast).
 

st599

Well-known member
Joined
9 Jan 2006
Messages
7,237
Visit site
After you've got to about 8m length, you've probably lost about 30% of your signal strength. By the time you get to 12m of RG58 you could be closer to 45% loss..

So it's not a hard cut off at 8m, just a diminishing signal strength.

I know you're not racing, but it can be nice to be guided by the Offshore Special Regulations, which specifies a co-axial feeder with no more than 40% power loss to be used, so it's likely neither of those cable types would meet their requirement (unless you have a very short mast).
Does that feeder loss include the connector? Even expensive co-ax and 2 PL 259s could easily be over that.
 

Martin_J

Well-known member
Joined
19 Apr 2006
Messages
4,257
Location
Portsmouth, UK
Visit site
It was a very approximate guestimate and totally off the top of my head.. (or whatever the saying is)..

And yes, of course connectors will introduce loss and so will bends if they're too tight a radius, as will moisture.

A good quality co-ax feeder will of course be much less lossy than those numbers, even over much longer distance... but you're unlikely to get one of these much better cables from a UK chandlery.

It was just to give an idea that whatever comes packaged with most of these masthead antennas is more lossy than you really want.. as seen by the earlier post that suggested no more than an 8 metre feed to the antenna was recommended by the manufacturer.
 
Joined
10 Nov 2021
Messages
53
Visit site
Have you fitted cheap led lights from china, anywhere on your boat lately? My freind did this and he could not transmit on his vhf ,but he could recieve transmitions, He took out all the cheap leds,and the problem was gone,
 

fredrussell

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2015
Messages
3,229
Visit site
Have you fitted cheap led lights from china, anywhere on your boat lately? My freind did this and he could not transmit on his vhf ,but he could recieve transmitions, He took out all the cheap leds,and the problem was gone,
Hmm. Having fitted loads of cheap led lights to my boat recently, your post worries me! I think I’d better do a transmission test next time I’m down the boat.
 

Plum

Well-known member
Joined
6 Jun 2001
Messages
4,245
Location
UK East Coast
Visit site
Have you fitted cheap led lights from china, anywhere on your boat lately? My freind did this and he could not transmit on his vhf ,but he could recieve transmitions, He took out all the cheap leds,and the problem was gone,
Yes, and some 12v phone chargers can upset the VHF radio too. A helpful person at Standard Horizon told me this and was the cause of the problem I had.
 

Alicatt

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2017
Messages
4,420
Location
Eating in Eksel or Ice Cold in Alex
Visit site
Yes, and some 12v phone chargers can upset the VHF radio too. A helpful person at Standard Horizon told me this and was the cause of the problem I had.
Many plug in chargers, both 12V and mains, are a big source of electrical noise across many frequency bands, and those network over mains wiring can totally blank out the receiver with broad spectrum noise.
As a ham radio operator when I powered up my receiver in our last house here the amount of RFI from wall-warts and powerline network devices had the Signal meter pegged against the stop.
 
Top