petem
Well-known member
Re: Time for me to get another boat! - shared ownership
Thanks Paul, that would work.
Thanks Paul, that would work.
Pete, in contrast to jfm, I had a bad experience sharing my first boat with somebody who was at that time was a good friend. We bought a 27ft Searay together and everything went fine for a few weeks but we quickly found out that we had very different ideas on what constituted cruising and proper maintenance. Basically he wanted to potter to the nearest pub and get pissed whilst I wanted to cruise ever further afield. This lead to disagreements about paying for fuel and for what I thought was necessary maintenance. Eventually I agreed to buy him out but we disagreed about the value of the boat and in the end neither of us were happy with the settlement.
What I'm trying to say that if you do enter into a partnership owning a boat make sure that either you are sure that you and your partners have similar attitudes to use of the boat and it's maintenance or there is a detailed agreement that sets out the terms of the partnership
FWIW, I'd always use a texas shootout not a third party valuer. forces a bit of reality into proceedings and is simpler. I quickly reached fair agreement directly with my sharers when buying out the two 25% shares in my first sq58 share scenario, without the risk of some left field answer from a valuerDeleted User - did your agreement not include provision for an independent valuation in the event that one party wanted to buy the other out?
Nope, we had no written agreement between us which was a big mistake. I suppose we felt as we were good friends we wouldn't fall out but we did. When I offered to buy my friend out, to my surprise he wanted the same amount back as he had originally put in but I pointed out that the boat had depreciated in the time we had owned it and that wasn't fair. In the end we settled on a figure somewhere in between what I thought was fair and his initial stake which meant that neither of us were happyDeleted User - did your agreement not include provision for an independent valuation in the event that one party wanted to buy the other out?
FWIW, I'd always use a texas shootout not a third party valuer. forces a bit of reality into proceedings and is simpler. I quickly reached fair agreement directly with my sharers when buying out the two 25% shares in my first sq58 share scenario, without the risk of some left field answer from a valuer
Click hereWhat's a Texas shoot out in this context?
What's a Texas shoot out
Maybe I slightly misunderstand.. if the offer price is rejected, is the other party given the option to buy, or is he obliged to buy? I can't see why someone who wants to sell his 25pct would entertain taking the risk he has to buy the whole damn boat ?!FWIW, I'd always use a texas shootout not a third party valuer. forces a bit of reality into proceedings and is simpler. I quickly reached fair agreement directly with my sharers when buying out the two 25% shares in my first sq58 share scenario, without the risk of some left field answer from a valuer
Maybe I slightly misunderstand.. if the offer price is rejected, is the other party given the option to buy, or is he obliged to buy? I can't see why someone who wants to sell his 25pct would entertain taking the risk he has to buy the whole damn boat ?!
Edit I should say I was reading a different explanantion to that in MM's link.
I think I understand the theory, but how do you decide who has to state the amount, and what do you do if the person stating the amount simply lacks the funds to buy the other out? All very well saying 'if he pitches the price too high then he'll have to buy me out', but if he doesn't have the funds that's a bit of a moot point surely? And doubly so if actually, you don't want to sell, you'd rather buy him out because you want to keep the boat (albeit at a realistic figure).
If I may put it in simpler terms (considering that there's always someone with more money and/or better bluffers - same as with bigger boats, really):I can't write a fuller answer on my phone but my recollection of playing poker as a lad was that playing poker with people with more money than me or better bluffers is a bad idea.