Sea-Fever
Active member
Most teachers, like most people of working age, are near-zero risk themselves. They are not "cannon fodder" any more than doctors/nurses/supermarket workers, none of whom showed greater fatality or susceptibility through the first lockdown.
Teachers may not have shown susceptibility during the first lockdown because schools were shut.
Doctors and nurses, amazing people they are, get plastered in PPE.
My use of the phrase "cannon fodder" was meant to be supportive of teachers because they are unfortunately being exposed to large populations of young people up to the age of 21 who are spreading the disease...did you not see the amount of positive tests that came from university students???? Do you dispute this fact??
Teachers are not plastered in PPE but they are expected to move in and around young people all day long every day.
This isn't about protecting individuals. It's about collectively protecting those actually at risk, mainly the elderly, but also a small number of working age folks with e.g. type 1 diabetes or obesity. Those small numbers of teachers actually at risk may wish to seek time off, the rest must crack on.
You are saying that teachers are just individuals and not worthy of protection???
You're just agreeing with my point....they're basically being treated as cannon fodder. No protection but exposed to the virus.....crack on, as you say, take one for the team!
This is about deciding (right or wrong) that keeping schools open is one of the top priorities and therefore society/government accepts the collective risk to overall infections associated with schools. I strongly agree, because schools and children are NOT ANYWHERE shown to be significant or even average spreaders of disease; and because by having schools open you enable swathes of the country to go to work, including doctors and nurses as well as boring old taxpayers like me, because some children would otherwise be cooped up in sub-standard accommodation (and some of those again with their sub-standard parents), and because children's mental health seems to be an admirable health concern priority.
Yes you're talking about the kids again, but not the teachers.
I reiterate the point about the number student infections and the trajectory the disease in September when schools and university's went back.
Haha...we agree on somethingI agree with your last observation. We should be able to travel, with our households, to our boats and go sailing. The "overnight" bit is a shame, but I can see where it comes from and will reluctantly observe it.