st599
Well-known member
Yes, I now need a work permit for most of my work, and need to spend a fortune in ATA Carnets.Apart from those who want long holidays has anyone really noticed any difference?
Yes, I now need a work permit for most of my work, and need to spend a fortune in ATA Carnets.Apart from those who want long holidays has anyone really noticed any difference?
I agree…the economic benefit is to Europe and the deficit is to the UK…it seems strange that there are people who think Britain should blink firstThe majority of UK people take a couple of weeks holiday in the EU or elsewhere. Maybe some go more than once a year .
They are completely unaffected the 90/180 rule and probably don't even realise that such a rule exists.
People who are affected are those who have a property (or a boat) in the EU and would like to exceed the 90 days . Although a minority of people this is a significant number if countries like Spain and France are seeing an impact on their economies.
It would be good if the 90 days was relaxed to 180. If the EU (some countries more than others) is losing out on UK citizens spending it is up to the EU to do something about it. I don't see why the UK needs to do anything.
England got what England wanted.I agree…the economic benefit is to Europe and the deficit is to the UK…it seems strange that there are people who think Britain should blink first
There speaks a man with practical experience, for whose business Brexit has been a disbenefit.Yes, I now need a work permit for most of my work, and need to spend a fortune in ATA Carnets.
YesIs there anyone here* who can honestly claim that his business has benefited from Brexit?
and?
Don't be coy, please let us know in what way your business has benefited.
As one of those people I can confirm brexit is a pain in the ar@e. Yes it's all solvable, but its a massive waste of time. What makes it all really really annoying is that the UK refused the EU offer of 180 in 365. We could have maintained the existing arrangement.Maybe the situation is different and more problematic for those who are retired, or have second homes in Spain.
Without meaning to drag this into a different debate, it's a been a complete pain the backside, the whole damn thing. For everyone, British or EU, it would seem.As one of those people I can confirm brexit is a pain in the ar@e. Yes it's all solvable, but its a massive waste of time. What makes it all really really annoying is that the UK refused the EU offer of 180 in 365. We could have maintained the existing arrangement.
Still as to being affected, from November this year the EU will want fingerprints and e-visas. UK people going on holiday will REALLY notice that. I can see the daily wail headlines already.
What’s prosed is. Visa free waiver .There already is a 180 visa available for France a tourist visa .It would be interesting to see some hard facts about the economic impact on EU countries as a result of Brits inconvenienced by the 90/180 day rule. The last two years have been pretty good for tourism in SoF, with most hotels and restaurants reporting everything back to pre-pandemic levels. Property markets have held up remarkably well given the hike in interest rates and marinas are relatively busy year-round and still completely full in the summer months. I don't see or hear of anyone complaining about the exodus of Brits who can't stay more than 90 days. I don't know of many people with holiday homes or boats here that have been too badly affected by Brexit. For most, the 90/180 day approach works and they just need to keep track of days in the busy period between April and September. Maybe the situation is different and more problematic for those who are retired, or have second homes in Spain.
I'm not so sure about the level of political support, or support at a grass-roots level in France, for the proposals put forward to exempt those with second homes or boats from the 90/180 day rule. There was some real push back in the media coverage about this proposal being elitist, anti-democratic, favouring the rich over the poor, etc. and worst of all being very "un-French". I'm also not sure how this would work in practice, given that France, Spain, etc. must all comply with the rules of Schengen which is where the 90/180 day requirement comes from. I suspect there will still be a requirement for a visa of some sort to be issued, eve if this is done through an accelerated process.
There were 700 convictions from the Horizons scandal and may more people had their lives ruined by the actions of the Post Office. We're definitely talking many of thousands of people who have been affected.It doesn’t take many to get noticed .Best eg i can think up is the post office computer fiasco .
Mr Bates …..numbers 30 jailed another 70 bollocked off lives ruined .So a 100 tops . Actions been taken , Gov has set up zillions of enquires , compo on its way ,etc etc , even a film .The whole nine yards .
Thx for that erratum Pete .I have been out of the U.K. most of the time this winter , just returned FWIW to escape the 1/2 T madness about to be unleashed on the EU , so not really been picking up U.K. news or TV much .There were 700 convictions from the Horizons scandal and may more people had their lives ruined by the actions of the Post Office. We're definitely talking many of thousands of people who have been affected.
Not sure what PO situation has to do with all this and therefore why Porto introduced it, but for the record that 700 convictions is only those where POL was prosecutor. There are another 200+ convictions where Scots Proc Fiscal and NI's version of CPS were the prosecutors, fuelled of course by POL investigations. So, nearly 1000 convictions in whole of UK. Then if you add people made to pay money, prosecuted but not convicted (when POL dropped charges due to the Jenkins problem), etc, you get to almost 3,000 people harmed . Not counting their family members of course.There were 700 convictions from the Horizons scandal and may more people had their lives ruined by the actions of the Post Office. We're definitely talking many of thousands of people who have been affected.
Yet more - including Alan Bates - were affected (lost position) without being prosecuted. And it’s taken 20 odd years for them all not to get justice yet. Those hoping to see a general relaxation of 90/180 might wish not to think of parallels quite here.Not sure what PO situation has to do with all this and therefore why Porto introduced it, but for the record that 700 convictions is only those where POL was prosecutor. There are another 200+ convictions where Scots Proc Fiscal and NI's version of CPS were the prosecutors, fuelled of course by POL investigations. So, nearly 1000 convictions in whole of UK. Then if you add people made to pay money, prosecuted but not convicted (when POL dropped charges due to the Jenkins problem), etc, you get to almost 3,000 people harmed . Not counting their family members of course.
Searching on the Govt website looking for info on Visas it threw up a few submissions on the Horizon/Post office going back to about 2015, which I thought curious at the time.Not sure what PO situation has to do with all this and therefore why Porto introduced it, but for the record that 700 convictions is only those where POL was prosecutor. There are another 200+ convictions where Scots Proc Fiscal and NI's version of CPS were the prosecutors, fuelled of course by POL investigations. So, nearly 1000 convictions in whole of UK. Then if you add people made to pay money, prosecuted but not convicted (when POL dropped charges due to the Jenkins problem), etc, you get to almost 3,000 people harmed . Not counting their family members of course.
Made more money...and rid a few inconveniences...Don't be coy, please let us know in what way your business has benefited.
I'd like to hear more about,Made more money...and rid a few inconveniences...
and rid a few inconveniences... Could you elaborate.