Tranona
Well-Known Member
Historically, most sailing yachts were long keel boats with non-corroding led ballast in their keels. GRP came along and long keel boats with encapsulated led keels were built. Margins dropped and the long keel was replaced with an iron fin keel stuck under a beamier hull to increase room for accommodation. By the wayside fell sailing performance, sea keeping and safety. Long keelers have more drag in the water, hence need more canvass, but that doesn't mean they are not performing well in light winds. Fewer long keel boats are being built, as most boats nowadays are built on the cheap for the charter market. Long keelers still being built are Rustlers, Halberg Russeys, Nordic Folkboat to name a few.
While your chronology is sort of right your explanation is way off the mark. Long keels (which were commonly iron and not lead) were abandoned almost overnight when designers, builders and buyers realised that GRP opened up all sorts of possibilities. Little to do with cost but more to do with providing a better product. Given that probably 90% of the boats in use are not "traditional" long keelers, according to you they must be tens of thousands of boats that have poor seakeeping and are unsafe. Somebody must tell all the people who own and sail these boats all over the world.
Saying that one odd 70+ year old design is still in production proves nothing and Rustler maybe build one long keel boat a year if any. All their successful designs are modern with separate keels and in some cases spade rudders. You clearly have not seen the latest HRs which are the very opposite of what you describe - except that they are comfortable, seaworthy, safe - and fast!.
Long keel boats have their place because some people like them and probably some of them convince themselves that they are superior despite all the evidence to the contrary. If they really did have the superior qualities you claim they would still be made - it is not cost of building them that is the barrier, it is lack of demand to generate the volumes to achieve the cost reductions. Manufacturing costs of basic boats is almost directly related to weight of materials and a Nic 32 (for example) is only 500kgs heavier than my Bavaria 33 (although if you take away the ballast the boat itself is nearly a tonne lighter); sail area much the same, engine size the same etc. Material coasts will be much the same so using the same mechanised production methods no reason why you should not be able to build it for the same price. Just a problem then of finding between 5 and 10 people a WEEK to buy them. Just to put it in perspective, you would need to sell more in a year than were made of the original in the 17 years or so that it was in production.
Remember that back in the 60s and 70s most long keeled boats in the smaller sizes were cheap boats and newer designs that came on the market were often more expensive, simply because they offered more. Much the same thing happened when the European builders started offering boats in the 1990s. Same formula, more attractive boats for the price and buyers voted with their money.
Remember the OP asked just what was different about them, which I attempted to answer in a balanced way. No doubt as he goes through the boat buying/sailing process he will make up his own mind what is suitable for himself and his family.
