Woman and two dogs missing after boat crash off Suffolk/Essex coast

Cantata

Well-known member
Joined
1 Aug 2003
Messages
4,914
Location
Swale/Medway
Visit site
That is indeed an S31 - I have one myself - and I understand from a berth holder in SYH that this is the boat involved, although I do not know the owners.
Terrible thing to happen. And very sobering.
 

DavidofMersea

Well-known member
Joined
18 Jun 2001
Messages
23,616
Location
West Mersea in Summer - Ibiza in Winter
Visit site
I wonder what happened to the second dog. I believe a dog could survive much longer in the water than a human, if that is so, and it is/was in the water, it might be lucky and drift/swim ashore - but then where would it go? I recall several years ago someone from Mersea lost a dog overboard in the Blackwater, and it came ashore in Bradwell. Fortunately the dog was wearing a life jacket and it had his owners telephone number on it
 

Gargleblaster

Well-known member
Joined
16 Dec 2003
Messages
1,234
Location
Medway, Gillingham Reach
Visit site
I keep comparing this accident with the loss of the 'Ouzo' out of Bembridge in the Solent. Most of my information comes from this forum. But it would appear that both accidents may have happened after the P&O Ferry in the Ouzo accident and the Dredger in this incident turned from their course. I know the number of times that I have looked out under my genoa and said to myself 'we will clear that other vessel'. One probably relaxes at that stage not expecting the other vessel to turn across your path. Once again proving the dangers of assumptions. I don't know that that is what happened in this case but constant vigilance is necessary around other vessels.

There was some discussion on AIS. I have an AIS receiver that has a wonderful alarm [Radio Ocean RO4800], which I tend to turn off in busy shipping areas as the alarm is going constantly. And I then rely on my eyesight to avoid collisions. The first time I went into Dover with the AIS Alarm on I probably woke up the whole town as it takes about 5 secs to turn the alarm off and I was not getting that length of time between alarms. I now regret not buying an AIS transponder as I feel it equalizes the responsibility of avoiding collisions for the electronically dependent.

A very sad event and a cautionary tale for us all.
 

maby

Well-known member
Joined
12 Jun 2009
Messages
12,783
Visit site
I keep comparing this accident with the loss of the 'Ouzo' out of Bembridge in the Solent. Most of my information comes from this forum. But it would appear that both accidents may have happened after the P&O Ferry in the Ouzo accident and the Dredger in this incident turned from their course. I know the number of times that I have looked out under my genoa and said to myself 'we will clear that other vessel'. One probably relaxes at that stage not expecting the other vessel to turn across your path. Once again proving the dangers of assumptions. I don't know that that is what happened in this case but constant vigilance is necessary around other vessels.

There was some discussion on AIS. I have an AIS receiver that has a wonderful alarm [Radio Ocean RO4800], which I tend to turn off in busy shipping areas as the alarm is going constantly. And I then rely on my eyesight to avoid collisions. The first time I went into Dover with the AIS Alarm on I probably woke up the whole town as it takes about 5 secs to turn the alarm off and I was not getting that length of time between alarms. I now regret not buying an AIS transponder as I feel it equalizes the responsibility of avoiding collisions for the electronically dependent.

A very sad event and a cautionary tale for us all.

The AIS alarms can be a pain, but getting run down is a far greater pain! I wind the alarm radius in tight, grit my teeth and keep on cancelling them.
 

MoodySabre

Well-known member
Joined
24 Oct 2006
Messages
17,231
Location
Bradwell and Leigh-on-Sea
Visit site
If the survivor of this accident had AIS fitted and the alarm muted, I'm pretty sure he is seriously regretting it now!

He must have been very near the dredger before it was a danger so any alarm would have already sounded. AIS that close to land and known shipping lanes would hardly be necessary - eyeball would be more useful. It's all very sad and we will hopefully find out how it happened and learn from it.
 

Elemental

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2007
Messages
1,198
Location
Weymouth
Visit site
It's all very sad and we will hopefully find out how it happened and learn from it.
I absolutely agree.
I think there's an issue of familiarity sometimes too. Whenever I head off to France and end up near Dover (say) then I'm all over the boat looking and peering around sails, dodgers etc. The sprayhood is usually lowered to help. The AIS is fully enabled with alarms. Yet when I sail from Harwich, I'm somehow less concerned. It's easy to forget that your local venue (i.e. Harwich) is a very busy working port with large numbers of big vessels moving around. I, for one, will be redoubling my alertness when sailing locally.
 

Bru

Well-known member
Joined
17 Jan 2007
Messages
14,679
svpagan.blogspot.com
A very plausible scenario is that they saw the dredger before she started to turn slightly to starboard and assumed it would stay in the deep water channel

It would have been no more than five or six minutes from then to the collision.

This does assume that they were crossing the shipping channel

If they were inbound or outbound (which seems likely given their home port) I can't help but wonder what the hell they were doing in the South Channel - following the recommended route for small craft would have kept then safe

I must say that I'm a bit obsessed with sticking to the dashed line on the chart around Harwich / Felixstowe both when entering and leaving and when passing by. If I deviate off it into the shipping lanes I'm like a cat on a hot tin roof

Usually see one or more other yachts merrily bimbling around where the big ships, the tugs and the pilot boats play and more than once I've heard conversations on the VHF between the VTS and vessels working the harbour about pleasure craft being where they ideally didn't ought to be

That in no way exonerates the watchkeeper and lookout (assuming one was posted) on the dredger. Whatever else comes out in the news and reports it seems clear that both vessels must have failed to keep an adequate lookout

This tragedy is a stark reminder that our pastime isn't intrinsically safe and that a perfect day on the water can turn into disaster in minutes if we aren't careful
 
Top