Seagull remorse - does it exist?

Happy New shYear pin.

Thanks Dan. Happy new shYear pin to your good self.
Seagulls of course don't have shear pins, they have drive springs which outlast dozens of shear pins. Oh and they don't need impellors changed either - so no need to burn the planet making spare shear pins and impellors. Rejoice! :)
Braye1-1_zps84d5884b.jpg

Robin
Pleiades of Birdham
MXWQ5
 
Really environmentally friendly engineering. Very few petrochemical derived components (indeen none at all in the early ones), and a design life of at least forty years.

Despite the scorn heaped on them one still has a place on my transom, with alternatives from the same manufacturer in the workshop should I feel the need.

Forty years, eh? Can Hond/Suzuki/Mariner and the rest say that?
 
bloody nora

Really environmentally friendly engineering. Very few petrochemical derived components (indeen none at all in the early ones), and a design life of at least forty years.

Despite the scorn heaped on them one still has a place on my transom, with alternatives from the same manufacturer in the workshop should I feel the need.

Forty years, eh? Can Hond/Suzuki/Mariner and the rest say that?



as sailors we are supposed to love the environment we sail in

or maybe we don't give a tinkers cuss for it

....

try this experiment

fill a dustbin with water

run a modern four stroke in it for ten minutes

remove a bit of the water make yourself a lovely cup of tea with it


now get your pollution free seagull

run it in the barrell for a few minutes

remove a pint of water from the barrel

make a cup of tea

drink it

I bet you won't

please dispose of the other highly polluted water safely rather than pouring it down the drain

use it it to water the vegetable garden or have a bath in it - or wash the dog or thre car

bet you won't



what you say about the lengevity of the engineering is true

but......

you are making all your local fish and crabs , salt marshes, reeds etc live in the highly polluting crud that is being exuded by your lovely old seagull


recycle the seagull into something that is better for the environment
 
Last edited:
Not so sure I would do either Dylan as I am sure the additives used in all fuels would make the tea rather toxic from both! On the other hand you would probably find that John Williams from SOS would have no such qualms.
 
here is a challenge

I will film a honda four stroke test in a bin,

scoop out some water

boil it on the trangia

make a half pint of tea and drink it

all on film

provided a Seagull owner is prepared to do the same

2hp

start and run from cold for ten minutes



put up or shut up

Dylan
 
I will film a honda four stroke test in a bin,

scoop out some water

boil it on the trangia

make a half pint of tea and drink it

all on film

provided a Seagull owner is prepared to do the same

2hp

start and run from cold for ten minutes



put up or shut up

Dylan
Fantastic the duel is alive and kicking, come on you Seagull guys. Hey Dylan you could probably sell ticket for an event like this? I can see it now, roll up, roll up for the greatest show on earth!
 
And one for you Sir...

When next you are driving to pick up your new Japanese outboard from the dealer, or just dropping it off to have it serviced would you please apply your lips to the car exhaust pipe to suck up all the harmful emissions emitted as you complete your journey. If however you walk or cycle to the dealer or importer then well done Sir but perhaps you could apply same lips to the funnel of the ship that imported it as that must cost the planet something, or perhaps to the chimney of the factory that made the new engine - all can be filmed of course :D

Robin
Pleiades of Birdham
MXWQ5
 
point pollution

When next you are driving to pick up your new Japanese outboard from the dealer, or just dropping it off to have it serviced would you please apply your lips to the car exhaust pipe to suck up all the harmful emissions emitted as you complete your journey. If however you walk or cycle to the dealer or importer then well done Sir but perhaps you could apply same lips to the funnel of the ship that imported it as that must cost the planet something, or perhaps to the chimney of the factory that made the new engine - all can be filmed of course :D

Robin
Pleiades of Birdham
MXWQ5

not up for the challenge then....

the car exhaust is a good point

and I am as guilty as the next man

but.....

that is diverse pollution that enters the air and is swept away in the breeze to be added to the general pullution we all cause

the seagull pours most of its exudations straight into some of the most environmentally sensitive bits of environment in this jewel of an island

the bits where the sea meets the land

the places where those wonderful seals live, where the flocks of birds refule for their journeys north


to to pour a third of every gallon of petrol you use and all that oil is an absolute outrage

in my opinion

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myZz6yfegZ0

However, if it is of no consequence to the average seagull owner....

then so be it

but they are attempting to defend the indefensible

in my opinion

it is the difference between the bloke who goes out into the cockpit to smoke and the man who insists upon lighting up his old St Bruno in his house or in his his cabin and subjects his fellow planet dwellers to a good puff of pollution

so.... which seagull defgender is prepared to step up to the plate and make the film about drinking tea from a seagull test bin

Dylan

PS I do all my own servicing
 
In the bin?

Would it help understanding of the possible merits of British Seagull engineering if I filmed my Seagull being submerged in several feet of sea water then started again and running none the worse for the experience within 5 minutes?
Perhaps the challenge could be amended to submerge the 4 stroke Jap in the bin for 5 minutes then try to get it started ....get the kettle on ;)

Robin
Pleiades of Birdham
MXWQ5
 
not the point

Would it help understanding of the possible merits of British Seagull engineering if I filmed my Seagull being submerged in several feet of sea water then started again and running none the worse for the experience within 5 minutes?
Perhaps the challenge could be amended to submerge the 4 stroke Jap in the bin for 5 minutes then try to get it started ....get the kettle on ;)

Robin
Pleiades of Birdham
MXWQ5

the survivability of two strokes and their longevity is well proven and impossible to gainsay

I have owned seagulls and drowned them and started them again

I have also drowned a Honda and the dead carcase is still in my garage

the con rod went through the cylinder wall

curtains for the Honda

a lesson well learned

do not dunk your engine while running



however, it is the point pollution that is the problem

point pollution, point pullution, point pollution


the seagull is pissing a toxic and carcinogenic blend of pollutants into the waters around our coast

and if seagull owners don't give a flying fig....

shame on them is what I say

Dylan

#
 
Totally agree with you Dylan if still running using the old mega mix but to quote JW from SOS the resposible Seagull user does the following - "uses Bio degradable 2T oil, that leaves no lasting residue, turning to compost in 3 weeks! "
 
The world wont last for ever. I think a few old Seagulls arent going to have much affect. all those big range rovers commuting to sail their yachts, now there's a problem.

I think if people drive to their boats then they shouldnt be allowed to use an engine, they have to use wind or oars. if they are prepared to cycle to their boats then they can use an outboard. That ought to help save the planet, until the inevitable BOOM happens.
 
Where does this figure come from???

yes, my Seagull certainly doesn't deposit a third of its fuel in the sea. I'll admit there could be a few % comes out into the atmosphere in the blue cloud tho! :D

The fuel output doesn't seem to bother seals, I have had them follow close behind the rubber duck to the point where I cut the engine & started rowing for fear of the nosey sod getting a line of prop cuts across the top of his head.

A few millilitrs of oil in a million gallons of sea water are not significant & even where millions of gallons of crude have been dumped in disasters like the Torrey Canyon, the Braer (sp?) etc etc, where many, many creatures die & the sea is laid waste, a few years later you would struggle to see the difference from before the disaster.

Where I use mine, and I only use an engine on the dink very rarely (I prefer to row) then the big tides soon disperse any possible pollution. I think it is 3 years since I last used either of my o/bs in preference to rowing. I must clean 'em out & see if they stil work!

The soot that came out of my old MD2B before I replaced it is probably much worse & there are still thousands of them around, doing hundreds of miles a year.

I suspect your O/B on KatyL has caused more pollution than my new Yanmar I/B & an unused seagull.
 
Would it help understanding of the possible merits of British Seagull engineering if I filmed my Seagull being submerged in several feet of sea water then started again and running none the worse for the experience within 5 minutes?
Perhaps the challenge could be amended to submerge the 4 stroke Jap in the bin for 5 minutes then try to get it started ....get the kettle on ;)

Robin
Pleiades of Birdham
MXWQ5

But outboard engines are not supposed to be submerged in water. They are supposed to propel a dink along the surface of the water. Now if you're so convinced about the undying merits of your Seagull, take up Dylan's challenge.
 
Top