Rogue wave ?

Snowgoose-1

Well-known member
Joined
2 Jun 2015
Messages
1,097
Visit site
General consensus is that once you get a breaking wave on the beam that is equal to your vessels beam, then you stand a very good chance of reaching your vessels angle of vanishing stability. Eek. For me, breaking waves are the most challenging things out there. Keeping steerage so you can take it on a bow, or if canny at steering, on the quarter is vital. Again, for me, keeping some sail up for steerage has been important.
AFAIK The sail of the century , Shackleton's Eliphant Is to South Georgia , did not suffer a rolling or pitch pole . Yet must have experienced many breaking waves. Remarkable how they coped , particularly at night. I expect at night they steered by the sound of waves.
 

doug748

Well-known member
Joined
1 Oct 2002
Messages
13,335
Location
UK. South West.
Visit site
Did they all survive? I know there have been quite a few fatalities in similar incidents, so best not to make light unless we know there was a happy outcome.

Full story here:

VIDEO: Giant wave flips over stolen yacht during dramatic US rescue - Marine Industry News

Not a totally happy outcome for me, but the swimmer that saved the thief had no regrets:

“We got the mayday call in the classroom and played rock, paper, scissors for which swimmer got to go,” U.S. Coast Guard Third Class Petty Officer John Branch-Walton told KPTV. “It was definitely an amazing experience and I’d like to do it again.”


.
 

mjcoon

Well-known member
Joined
18 Jun 2011
Messages
4,650
Location
Berkshire, UK
www.mjcoon.plus.com
Did they all survive? I know there have been quite a few fatalities in similar incidents, so best not to make light unless we know there was a happy outcome.
I'm certainly not making light! In the video the yacht seems, not surprisingly, all over the place after it came upright and I wondered whether the skipper and/or helm was still aboard. And now had several people to rescue from back in the worst water. It clearly looked dire. And where was the videographer based?
 

penfold

Well-known member
Joined
25 Aug 2003
Messages
7,729
Location
On the Clyde
Visit site
AFAIK The sail of the century , Shackleton's Eliphant Is to South Georgia , did not suffer a rolling or pitch pole . Yet must have experienced many breaking waves. Remarkable how they coped , particularly at night. I expect at night they steered by the sound of waves.
Did they steer, or deploy a sea anchor? At that latitude there's unlikely to be reliable moonlight and they wouldn't have lamps capable of casting enough light even if they had fuel to spare.

I'm certainly not making light! In the video the yacht seems, not surprisingly, all over the place after it came upright and I wondered whether the skipper and/or helm was still aboard. And now had several people to rescue from back in the worst water. It clearly looked dire. And where was the videographer based?
No injuries or significant damage; photographer was on land. Bavaria 38 incident.
 
Last edited:

AntarcticPilot

Well-known member
Joined
4 May 2007
Messages
10,574
Location
Cambridge, UK
www.cooperandyau.co.uk
Did they steer, or deploy a sea anchor? At that latitude there's unlikely to be reliable moonlight and they wouldn't have lamps capable of casting enough light even if they had fuel to spare.
I'm pretty sure they steered the whole way. I'd be very surprised if they had warps and canvas suitable to construct and deploy a useful sea anchor. They did deck the entire boat with wood and canvas, and Shackleton attributed their success to that; he stated that without it the boat would have been flooded. Also, the book describes their watch-keeping system, and that implies continual steering. If they did use a sea anchor (and I don't recall them saying they did) it would have been to slow them when surfing down a wave so they didn't pitch-pole at the bottom. But I'm pretty sure they didn't use one; the constraints of working with the materials they'd salvaged from the Endurance would mitigate against it. Remember that in order to make the journey across the ice, they had stripped everything to the bare bones; even "Mr Chippy" the cat was sacrificed to save weight. A sea-anchor would have required things like chain and long warps; remember too that warps would have been of hemp or other natural fibre, so much heavier for their strength.

Their passage was mostly downwind, somewhat quartering. That's why they headed for South Georgia rather than the Falklands; the Falklands were closer but would require sailing somewhat to windward with the sea on their beam. And even though they attempted to keep to windward of South Georgia, their landfall was on the south coast, prohibiting them from sailing to the north coast - they couldn't get to windward to go round the westernmost point, and leeward was the uncharted but known Hauge Reef, not to mention that if they made it to the eastern end of South Georgia they's still have had to make it to the whaling stations, which were to windward.
 

Bilgediver

Well-known member
Joined
6 Jun 2001
Messages
8,190
Location
Scotland
Visit site
It's hard to see what's going on there but it looks like a breaking wave in shallow water close to shore? In which case the quieter period.might just have been a gap between ongoing sets of big waves.


This is off the coast of Oregon near the Columbia River. These are normal conditions in this area and where the US Coastguard and others train their crews to deal with these conditions. Fully loaded ships departing the Columbia River have to take these conditions into a count before attempting g to cross the bar at the River mouth.

A search on YouTube will bring up numerous videos of coastguard cutters training in this area.
 
Top