Iroko vs Teak ?

Boo2

Well-known member
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Messages
8,605
Visit site
Hi,

What are the differences between iroko and teak for external use on a yacht ? I've seen several references to iroko cockpit "embellishments" (seat tops etc) and wondered how it compares with teak ? Do they ever use iroko for decking in the same way as teak ?

Thanks,

Boo2
 

Tranona

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2007
Messages
42,830
Visit site
Have a look in this month's PBO - there is a comprehensive article on woods.

Basically Iroko is considered "poor mans teak". It is similar colour, not so durable but still good and most importantly 60% of the price (typically). Main drawback is that it can be difficult to work because of interlocking grain and has a habit of twisting when cut into strips. Not stable enough for decking.

BTW teak was first became popular for decks in the 20's and 30's in the US because it was cheaper than local woods (US turn to plunder rain forests!) and did not need any finishing so saved on labour. Has now become an expensive affectation following 1980's attempts by builders to hide the blandness of GRP.
 

tillergirl

Well-known member
Joined
5 Nov 2002
Messages
8,576
Location
West Mersea
Visit site
My boat is built out of iroko except than when built she had a teak deck. I have never heard of iroko being used for a deck but I suppose it has. The difference with iroko is that it has a tendency to a slightly wild grain so it may not look as even as teak. I don't think it 'greys' as nicely as teak. That said my cockpit seat tops are iroko, the cockpit sides are etc. The teak deck has not survived but that was more to do with the quality of the screws originally used which rotted and led to the deck water tightness failing. Both iroko and teak can be difficult to varnish (need to get rid of the oil). Personally I would not use iroko for decking but then I wouldn't use teak (and don't anymore).
 
Last edited:

Lakesailor

New member
Joined
15 Feb 2005
Messages
35,236
Location
Near Here
Visit site
Iroko has a shorter grain structure than teak so when steaming (like rubbing strakes) the ends of the grain fibres can "poke out" a bit. Sometimes it can split if trying to bend it too much.
I think it's a bit like sapele with the grain "rubbing up" in bands when power planed. I've just used some sapele for a rudder blade and after being put through a planer/thicknesser it has a few of those patches where the grain has rubbed up.. Not insurmountable and will sand down. I think iroko is similar, but I have found it easy to work and chisel.
 

higler

Member
Joined
1 Jun 2010
Messages
171
Visit site
Have jut used iroko for new toe rail, and for keel protection under a new keel band. In our yard its used extensivly would love teak but who can afford such luxuries today. Varnishing the toe rail was a no no, and was advised to let it silver up. I let it go but didnt like the effect, so rubbed it down and used teak oil on it, now looks fine three coats later. any bad grain was sanded down with a machine, it does the trick quite well.
 

Graham_Wright

Well-known member
Joined
30 Dec 2002
Messages
7,969
Location
Gloucestershire
www.mastaclimba.com
One word of caution. Iroko dust is extremely irritating. I bought a large plank and asked a woodworking shop to split it into strips. One of the operatives declined as he explained it caused his face to bleed. I can believe it.
 

rogerthebodger

Well-known member
Joined
3 Nov 2001
Messages
13,789
Visit site
Having built lots of things from Iroko there is lots of natural oil in Iroko like teak.

In fact it is the oil that is extremely irritating as pointed out by Graham_Wright.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Other threads that may be of interest

Top