CAPTAIN FANTASTIC
Well-known member
Another vote for "the Russian Way".
The Russian treatment its OK by me
Another vote for "the Russian Way".
They havent done anything positive. Capturing them, taking away their AK47s and then letting them go free is simply a waste of effort and money.
They should do what they used to do with privateers - string them up. It might just be a disincentive to piracy.
.
You are the most negative impossible to please bunch of miserable gits that ever walked a forum.
Nothing but moan moan moan about how the Navy never does anything , and when they do something positive no-one has anything good to say either
- W
Maybe you should read my posts and then you may understand how the system works. Remember that saying, "innocent untill proven guilty" if there is no evidence to be had on these people how can anybody touch them? Its all down to human rights.
There are men and women out there right now who have been away from there families for months on end providing a service all organsied by NATO. You try telling them they are doing nothing to there face. Most people are proud of what our boys and girls do away from home, you should be too!
Everything we do out there is all organised from dry land in the comfort of an office, we do as we are told as its what we are paid for.
We dont risk our lives because we choose to, its because we feel that we do make a difference, whether it be anti piracy in the indian ocean or catching drug smugglers in the carribean.
I'm with you Webby, a fine result for the British Royal Navy!
Throughout history societies have tried various methods for dealing with criminals.
We've hung them, we've drawn and quartered them, we've put their heads on poles and we've left them to starve and rot in cages. They've been beaten, deported, locked up, they've had their hands cut off, they've been shot, guillotined, injected with a lethal cocktail of drugs, humiliated in public in the stocks, public executions ...... need I go on?
Well it doesn't seem to be working, none of it. They haven't gone away.
Throughout history societies have tried various methods for dealing with criminals.
We've hung them, we've drawn and quartered them, we've put their heads on poles and we've left them to starve and rot in cages. They've been beaten, deported, locked up, they've had their hands cut off, they've been shot, guillotined, injected with a lethal cocktail of drugs, humiliated in public in the stocks, public executions ...... need I go on?
Well it doesn't seem to be working, none of it. They haven't gone away.
It might make us all feel a bit better to see swift and deadly justice administered and posted on YouTube, but there will be more criminals to take their place.
IMHO, two things need to be done. The first is to make it uneconomical for the pirates to continue. The second is to educate the would-be-pirates that they'd be better off fishing.
I believe that is exactly what RFA Fort Victoria and all the others are doing out there.
In the global scale of things, what does it really matter if a few pirates get dumped back in their lawless country? (minus boat, guns and supplies)
Dead people serve no purpose - they and their deeds are quickly forgotten. They are replaced by the next one, who believes he is smarter, better or luckier - look how many deaths the rival drug gangs are clocking up in Mexico, they don't seem to deter each other.
If the pirates are returned to shore having lost their investment, there is no vacancy for another would be pirate to step up and replace them. They can choose to find the money and re-invest, but if they keep losing it then eventually they'll retire. Every pirate killed is a job vacancy for every would-be pirate sitting ashore, and one ship where a ransom is paid is like a lottery win. By removing the gangs already operating, we're creating job opportunities for the next wave.
Beat them with economics, not violence.
Come on smile
pirates get dumped back in their lawless country? (minus boat, guns and supplies)
If the pirates are returned to shore having lost their investment, there is no vacancy for another would be pirate to step up and replace them. They can choose to find the money and re-invest, but if they keep losing it then eventually they'll retire. Every pirate killed is a job vacancy for every would-be pirate sitting ashore, and one ship where a ransom is paid is like a lottery win. By removing the gangs already operating, we're creating job opportunities for the next wave.
Beat them with economics, not violence.
Possibly because we've stopped doing all of the above?
There is no need to be defensive even after the Iranian patrol boat debacle. Its quite clear that you are stuck with all sorts of constraints that prevent any really effective response to piracy so no one is blaming the RN as such. But the fact remains that after all these years and all the money spent keeping you out there , the problem remains. The combined efforts of the civilised west has failed to clear out the pirate gangs in the way that the Navy did elsewhere a few centuries ago. Its farcical.
You may hope that "most people are proud of what our boys and girls do" but I suspect the reality is rather different. Certainly there was no reason to be proud of what the pongos achieved in Iraq and their having to be bailed out by the yanks.
A lot of stuff we do out there does not get mentioned in the press, and normally what does get mentioned in the press is wrong.
And the average forumite on here only remembers 2 stories about the navy: the Chandlers & the RIB in Iran.
Certainly there was no reason to be proud of what the pongos achieved in Iraq and their having to be bailed out by the yanks.
Beat them with economics, not violence.
totally agreeThroughout history societies have tried various methods for dealing with criminals.
We've hung them, we've drawn and quartered them, we've put their heads on poles and we've left them to starve and rot in cages. They've been beaten, deported, locked up, they've had their hands cut off, they've been shot, guillotined, injected with a lethal cocktail of drugs, humiliated in public in the stocks, public executions ...... need I go on?
Well it doesn't seem to be working, none of it. They haven't gone away.
It might make us all feel a bit better to see swift and deadly justice administered and posted on YouTube, but there will be more criminals to take their place.
IMHO, two things need to be done. The first is to make it uneconomical for the pirates to continue. The second is to educate the would-be-pirates that they'd be better off fishing.
I believe that is exactly what RFA Fort Victoria and all the others are doing out there.
In the global scale of things, what does it really matter if a few pirates get dumped back in their lawless country? (minus boat, guns and supplies)
Dead people serve no purpose - they and their deeds are quickly forgotten. They are replaced by the next one, who believes he is smarter, better or luckier - look how many deaths the rival drug gangs are clocking up in Mexico, they don't seem to deter each other.
If the pirates are returned to shore having lost their investment, there is no vacancy for another would be pirate to step up and replace them. They can choose to find the money and re-invest, but if they keep losing it then eventually they'll retire. Every pirate killed is a job vacancy for every would-be pirate sitting ashore, and one ship where a ransom is paid is like a lottery win. By removing the gangs already operating, we're creating job opportunities for the next wave.
Beat them with economics, not violence.
Im not trying to impress people with good news i just try to educate people in what we are really doing over there. Its not fair on people like me if people are making judgements on the RN/RFA with false information.
And the average forumite on here only remembers 2 stories about the navy: (