st599
Well-known member
Twice that of a similar acreage of forest.What is the carbon sequestration contribution of an anchorage sized seagrass meadow?
Twice that of a similar acreage of forest.What is the carbon sequestration contribution of an anchorage sized seagrass meadow?
Twice that of a similar acreage of forest.
They'd get told to go forth and multiply; as long as bottom trawling and scallop dredging are legal and fish farms are allowed to dump untreated industrial waste into the sea and don't get fined when thousands of fish escape from their flimsy cages, the damage that may or may not be caused by moorings and anchoring is vanishingly insignificant.Doubt away dear fellow, Natural Scotland will be using the very same flawed science in due course to bring in anchoring restrictions where you sail.
Studland is the first area to go under the cosh there is a whole list of other areas in England that have already been consulted on, which is why all eyes are on Studland.
Your turn will come
They'd get told to go forth and multiply; as long as bottom trawling and scallop dredging are legal and fish farms are allowed to dump untreated industrial waste into the sea and don't get fined when thousands of fish escape from their flimsy cages, the damage that may or may not be caused by moorings and anchoring is vanishingly insignificant.
When we have that poltroon Ewing having unminuted meetings with MEGASALMONLOLZ LTD in between doing deals with Greensill I'm quite sure the current set of thieves and charlatans will try and sell us down the river; that does not impact upon my ability to thumb my nose at them, either at the ballot box or by anchoring where I choose and believe is safe.
The problem is that if you actually read the so called "science", little of it is grounded in the particular location but "borrowed" from other locations which are fundamentally different. There has been no serious research carried out specifically on Studland. That which has been is largely by charlatans who start from a position that meets with their own prejudicies and then forces their evidence to fit. Those of us who have spent a lifetime in academic research can spot them a mile off, but politicians and civil servants love them because they can hide behind them and point to the celebrities and professional campaigners who support them as evidence of public concern and acceptance.Well I would accept sensible restrictions to my activities. If that will positively benefit the ecology. The thing is that I am in no position to make any judgement. We have to rely on scientists to advise. There is no balanced debate on here. Just a one sided argument.
To be fair, though, there is nowhere (that I know of) in Scotland quite like Studland, with scores or even hundreds of boats anchoring off a popular beach.If you go back over the various threads you'll find pretty much the same naive prediction about what would happen at Studland.
I saw a boat anchored in Ettrick Bay once?To be fair, though, there is nowhere (that I know of) in Scotland quite like Studland, with scores or even hundreds of boats anchoring off a popular beach.
Living dangerously, eh? I've tried to find out what the underwater obstructions there are, without success. Something wartime, probably.I saw a boat anchored in Ettrick Bay once?
Thats Ok until someone comes along to enforce it. You could then find yourself faced with a bill for <£20k + costs from the local magistrate. Ignorance of the law etc...When we have that poltroon Ewing having unminuted meetings with MEGASALMONLOLZ LTD in between doing deals with Greensill I'm quite sure the current set of thieves and charlatans will try and sell us down the river; that does not impact upon my ability to thumb my nose at them, either at the ballot box or by anchoring where I choose and believe is safe.
Got a reply from my MP. She is aware of the strength of feeling about MMO's proposals for Studland but is not in a position to directly intervene. I propose to ask her if this means that MMO can spend taxpayer's money and curtail the liberties of citizens while not being accountable to parliament?
Thats Ok until someone comes along to enforce it. You could then find yourself faced with a bill for <£20k + costs from the local magistrate. Ignorance of the law etc...
Got a reply from my MP. She is aware of the strength of feeling about MMO's proposals for Studland but is not in a position to directly intervene. I propose to ask her if this means that MMO can spend taxpayer's money and curtail the liberties of citizens while not being accountable to parliament?
Yes that's her, she should be up to speed on legal matters. TBH I thought she was still on maternity leave!Fareham ?, Presuming your MP is the Attorney General.
Asked her that and now - though unable to intervene in the MMO's decision-making process in this instance - she is going to write to them on my behalf raising my concerns. Seems you have to stick at it with these politicos.Got a reply from my MP. She is aware of the strength of feeling about MMO's proposals for Studland but is not in a position to directly intervene. I propose to ask her if this means that MMO can spend taxpayer's money and curtail the liberties of citizens while not being accountable to parliament?
Asked her that and now - though unable to intervene in the MMO's decision-making process in this instance - she is going to write to them on my behalf raising my concerns. Seems you have to stick at it with these politicos.