JumbleDuck
Well-known member
We certainly should not be allowing Salmond to get his feet under the BoE table on such decisions.
Do you think the BoE should take Scotland's economic needs into account when setting interest rates at the moment?
We certainly should not be allowing Salmond to get his feet under the BoE table on such decisions.
Do you think the BoE should take Scotland's economic needs into account when setting interest rates at the moment?
I'm sure it does, to some extent. They base their decisions on well defined economic measures such as growth, inflation, unemployment etc. which are calculated across the entire UK economy, so Scotland's needs will be factored into the decision, but perhaps not to the extent that they would like. I'm a supporter of Scottish independence - their aspirations, politics and economy are too different to that of Britain as a whole to comfortably fit into a unified framework. A monetary union cannot work - an independent Scotland will follow a far more left wing path than the remainder of the UK. If Salmond gets his way and gets to keep most of the North Sea oil, they will have a very different economy from an England that is driven by financial services and high technology. We will continuously be pulling in different directions - and we would be stupid to allow BoE policy to be influenced by the needs of a foreign country.
Harold Wilson had general election majorities of 4 in 1964 and 3 in October 1974. In 1964 Labour MPs were returned in 43 out 71 seats in Scotland and in 1974 it was 41 out of 71.
England and Scotland formed a union. That union then formed a union with Ireland and that second union now relates to N Ireland. So if the first union is broken which bit of N Ireland goes to Scotland?
Another question.
If Scotland is not part of the UK will I have to pay roaming charges on my mobile?
If Scotland is also not part of the EU, will these charges not be constrained by EU regulations?
Just wondering, ought to go and give the boat a wash before the water runs out.