New (England) restrictions impact on sailing?

Lucky Duck

Well-known member
Joined
9 Jun 2009
Messages
8,375
Visit site
6k in savings not 60k and i'm sure there are many JAM families in this situation who's parents are isolating already so poping off to the country estate is not an option,plus there are travel restrictions etc

Shouldn't you be on National Trust forums telling members not to visit thier sites?
 

Blue Sunray

Well-known member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
2,424
Visit site
6k in savings not 60k and i'm sure there are many JAM families in this situation who's parents are isolating already so poping off to the country estate is not an option,plus there are travel restrictions etc

Sorry I didn't realise that you meant ordinary types, I'm not sure HR is too concerned about them, they're replaceable after all.
 

Greenheart

Well-known member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
10,299
Visit site
I think I've read every response here...apologies if I am repeating anyone who posted earlier.

Repeated visits to a non-MDL Solent marina during the lock-down period early this season, showed that many, many couples were routinely staying aboard their boats overnight. No fuss was being made; no barbecues, no conspicuous drunkenness or loud music; just quiet, responsible people, putting reasonable interpretation on the guidelines, behaving safely and not drawing attention.

If you keep asking "can we stay aboard?" or "Is it permitted?" or "What are we allowed to do?", the answers from any kind of authority will be uniformly negative and restrictive.

If you stop discussing it and just do it, with enough care not to need assistance or rescue, there is suddenly nothing to discuss. The investigation of law-breaking will be reserved for the teeming morons ashore who cannot or will not resist arranging and attending drunken parties as if there was no danger to avoid.

The ruling-out of activities which are plainly low-risk or no-risk, seems to be a blanket decision to discourage assumptions of invidiousness, by those whose activities are slightly or significantly more risky. Much easier to rule out every possibility, than to defend a line drawn between varying degrees of risk.

Nobody notices (or cares) until you wilfully draw attention to see if they object...which they then will.
 

Lucky Duck

Well-known member
Joined
9 Jun 2009
Messages
8,375
Visit site
Turning off the AIS and wearing a covid safe badge when out and about will also help

I agree on AIS, the number of people who apparently hadn't understood that marine traffic and the like would show their stay at Newton Creek or Osborne bay was embarrassing
 

Hallberg-Rassy

Active member
Joined
29 Oct 2020
Messages
246
Visit site
making individual isolation impossible ... for how long and how much?
Didn't we have large quarantine spaces set up?

I'm thinking how Japan copes with tsunamis and earthquakes.

To my mind, Covid-19 is only the trail run and given the nature of human relationships with zoonotic diseases, there's going to be another worse one along shortly. Therefore we need some kind of emergency response agency with capacity to remove the virulent or vulnerable from society, however it is done, eg in their homes, or lockdown communities.

I think We know how it entered the country.

Do we know yet how the most contagious communities are spreading the virus?
 

RJJ

Well-known member
Joined
14 Aug 2009
Messages
3,160
Visit site
so assuming none can work from home,and the enclosed space only has limited space,making individual isolation impossible who supports them if ineligble for income support due to having a slightly more than£6000 in savings?
and for how long and how much?
Nobody's pretending focussed protection is easy. The trade-off, however, is against locking down the whole economy, which isn't so easy either. In fact, even if you chuck the kitchen sink at it at vast expense, it's most unclear it works.

So instead of furloughing millions of people, providing billions of handouts to fraudsters bounce-back loans, and meanwhile letting all other trades crash...the proposal is to put measures in place to support those in vulnerable households. At its most simple, that means ensuing they can get basic deliveries in a Covid-safe way - not a "low-risk" way, a "safe for vulnerable people" way.

If I was vulnerable, of course, what I might really want is to be placed in sheltered accommodation and under a really effective protective umbrella while infection is at large. Pretty sure that's easily affordable, over a couple of months, compared to the cost of maintaining on/off lockdown for the foreseeable future.
 

Hallberg-Rassy

Active member
Joined
29 Oct 2020
Messages
246
Visit site
If I was vulnerable, of course, what I might really want is to be placed in sheltered accommodation and under a really effective protective umbrella while infection is at large.
Just to keep it within the limits of this forum, "sheltered accommodation" such as sticking them all in one of those redundant cruise ships? Two birds, one stone.

Going back to personal boats, do private marinas or municipally run ports have a right to deny you access to your property?
 

FlyingGoose

Well-known member
Joined
12 Feb 2019
Messages
4,639
Location
The Known Universe
Visit site
Just to keep it within the limits of this forum, "sheltered accommodation" such as sticking them all in one of those redundant cruise ships? Two birds, one stone.

Going back to personal boats, do private marinas or municipally run ports have a right to deny you access to your property?
Yes under their terms and conditions and under the Covid act if they are forced to close or restrict access
 
Top