nevis768
Active member
I'm after a life raft, Oban based. 28 ft boat, usually 2 on board, sometimes only 1. Any recommendations?
That is because there is nothing to it1 it is not really a liferaft as in a survival capsule, but a super strong paddling pool with a canopy. As in post#6 might be useful in the event of fire in benign conditions, but given that such events are even more rare than "real" founderings (which are very rare!) one questions whether they have any value at all.Gosh, that's tiny!
- Lalizas 4 person.
- Packed dimensions: 330mm x 410 mm x 150mm
- Weight: 9.1kg
Yes, I quite agree, indeed the "paddling pool" comparison was exactly my thought too!. Has whether anyone considered individual 'proper' offshore survival suits as alternatives for 24 hours after an abandonment?That is because there is nothing to it1 it is not really a liferaft as in a survival capsule, but a super strong paddling pool with a canopy. As in post#6 might be useful in the event of fire in benign conditions, but given that such events are even more rare than "real" founderings (which are very rare!) one questions whether they have any value at all.
Begs the question - why do you think you need a liferaft at all?I'll have a look at the Lalizas too, I'm mostly not too far from the coast, although some areas are remote enough
Fishing boat rescues rarely correlate to yachts. Why did it sink? and would a yacht have had the same sort of issue?Back in September two people were rescued by the RNLI Oban lifeboat from their liferaft. The mayday boat (a fishing boat) sank near Lismore (about 10 miles from Oban). Not even remote by west coast of Scotland standards. Conditions were calm.
All sorts of things CAN and DO happen but how many actually result in a situation where a liferaft is the only alternative? What evidence there is suggests that such events (28' yacht, in UK coastal waters having a catastrophic failure resulting in foundering) are extremely rare to the point of being almost unknown.Yachts can sink due to failure of skin fittings, our stern tube detached from hull and the only reason it did not leak disastrously is that the clearance to the prop was tiny.
My engine compartment has filled with water due to un noticed cooling water failure causing exhaust box and exhaust failure , so cooling water restart flooded everything and I have had cooling water pipe leaks due to vibration chaffing on two occasions where water pumped pointlessly into the engine room without any external sign. All mine were under engine and thats in 40 years so not frequent but if at night in bad weather any of these could have endangered the boat, though duplicate high capacity electric bilge pumps made it more amusing than serious in our circumstances.
Failures dont confine them selves to daylight in benign weather. A plastic paddling pool life raft is simply somewhere to die of hypothermia or seasickness.
And if you can readily get a heavy canister or valise from cabin to deployment at night in a rolling sea, well you are way stronger than I am, and I am sure my wife could not manage at all
If you don’t take your boat out into conditions which might result in a foundering (Presently, with a young family, I don’t) then the relative risk of foundering reduces to zero- as I in fact said. There is then no case to weigh the usefulness of a raft which is substandard for those purposes against the risk of such a situation materialising (as I said and which exposes your false dichotomy). So, the only circumstances in which the raft is needed become calm weather close to the coast following a fire on the boat which could not be controlled. It’s quite a sufficient back-up for that. I wouldn’t ever argue it’s a (weather) survival raft and want to make it quite clear I didn’t buy it in any way thinking of those purposes. The wider point being that there are reasons to buy a life raft wholly exclusive of ideas of survival conditions and the choice should not always be framed in those terms.That is because there is nothing to it1 it is not really a liferaft as in a survival capsule, but a super strong paddling pool with a canopy. As in post#6 might be useful in the event of fire in benign conditions, but given that such events are even more rare than "real" founderings (which are very rare!) one questions whether they have any value at all.
Not sure what the conclusion here is but I will point out that skin fitting failure is a maintenance failure. Let’s assume that we all go to sea in well-found boats which is, I think, a good starting point.Yachts can sink due to failure of skin fittings, our stern tube detached from hull and the only reason it did not leak disastrously is that the clearance to the prop was tiny.
My engine compartment has filled with water due to un noticed cooling water failure causing exhaust box and exhaust failure , so cooling water restart flooded everything and I have had cooling water pipe leaks due to vibration chaffing on two occasions where water pumped pointlessly into the engine room without any external sign. All mine were under engine and thats in 40 years so not frequent but if at night in bad weather any of these could have endangered the boat, though duplicate high capacity electric bilge pumps made it more amusing than serious in our circumstances.
Failures dont confine them selves to daylight in benign weather. A plastic paddling pool life raft is simply somewhere to die of hypothermia or seasickness.
And if you can readily get a heavy canister or valise from cabin to deployment at night in a rolling sea, well you are way stronger than I am, and I am sure my wife could not manage at all
But the point that I was making is that such events (fire in calm coastal conditions) are also vanishingly rare. I can think of only 3 in the last 20 odd years, 2 of which were very close to shore but the boats did not sink and crew were rescued from the burning boats and one in the middle of the N Sea which did eventually sink and the (single) crew took to their raft.If you don’t take your boat out into conditions which might result in a foundering (Presently, with a young family, I don’t) then the relative risk of foundering reduces to zero- as I in fact said. There is then no case to weigh the usefulness of a raft which is substandard for those purposes against the risk of such a situation materialising (as I said and which exposes your false dichotomy). So, the only circumstances in which the raft is needed become calm weather close to the coast following a fire on the boat which could not be controlled. It’s quite a sufficient back-up for that. I wouldn’t ever argue it’s a (weather) survival raft and want to make it quite clear I didn’t buy it in any way thinking of those purposes. The wider point being that there are reasons to buy a life raft wholly exclusive of ideas of survival conditions and the choice should not always be framed in those terms.