Rigger Mortice
N/A
Has anyone said, or even suggested, they should be banned?The H'n'S criticism was directed at the misguided people who say flares should be banned etc. As for your other views, I've 'done my bit' on this thread, so, yeah whatevs.
Has anyone said, or even suggested, they should be banned?The H'n'S criticism was directed at the misguided people who say flares should be banned etc. As for your other views, I've 'done my bit' on this thread, so, yeah whatevs.
Yes that guy was horribly injured, he had to have his guts spliced as I remember, poor bloke, but it isn't a winning argument to stop using parachute flares.
Lots more people (orders of magnitude) have been saved than injured by parachute flares.
They are a vital part of the distress arsenal, let's not fan the flames, all the best Jerry
Thanks for that. Can you give more details?........As for rescues initiated by parachute flares there have been many. I have attended two such incidents personally.
C'mon! Realistically what are the actual chances of every single piece of electrical equipment dying?
In a situation so bad that you're sending a Mayday or in normal sailing?
S**t can happen at any time to anyone;
Such as a lightning strike very early in the thunderstorm cell with torrential rain which broke over us we sailed into on a night entrance to the estuary where Borkum lies last May.
Came pdq low from landward, unseen against the land and islands, so hit us almost without any warning- zero vis kept our hands full dodging shipping and blind nav(first time in there), so no chance for h/h gps, vhf, etc to go in the oven.
I was soaked right through in seconds at the helm-a strike would have fried me, but SWMBO would have had a 'dark' boat and a bbq stiff to d/w- if hopefully the flares would not have been cooked off in their stowage by the strike- but other friends who have been actually been hit say they don't.
Ask the Coastguard. Personally, I don't care whether you carry flares or not.Thanks for that. Can you give more details?
What I am looking for is instances where:
rescue resulting in a saving of life was initiated by a parachute flare, where;
other means of signally distress (for instance, radio MAYDAY, GMDSS, PLB, EPIRB, mobile 'phone (!)) would not have initiated the rescue.
In other words, a reason why I should carry these relatively expensive and liable-to-time-expiry (and, some say, dangerous) fireworks, rather than spending my money on some other item of safety kit.
Specifically parachute flares; I already carry pin-point hand-held reds and a smoke.
Surely most people are already aware of this. You seem to be having a one person argument.Just checked with RYA web site, which I should have done earlier.
Quick précis as regards parachute flares:
"4 recommended if VHF DSC or PLB/EPIRB not carried....
EPIRB/DSC is now the accepted modern method for alerting".
(note the "if".)
Pinpoint hand-held reds, and smoke flares, are still recommended.
A mayday situation obviously
You are right. EPIRB, VHF etc. are the first option but parachute flares still have their place. So does black smoke from a fire made from diesel soaked rags, of course.I still like the idea of being able to signal to people watching and not just people with the appropriate electronic listening equipment. Maybe in more crowded waters I'd feel different.
It's a pretty winning argument as far as I'm concerned if there's any viable alternative! And I believe that these days there is just that
That is undoubtedly true but how many of those people would have been saved had they used an alternative (and potentially IMO more effective) method of signalling their distress?
I would suggest that they are no longer vital, and arguably they are even obsolete
Realistically, I can carry at the most four parachute flares, in reality I'm likely to carry the standard set of two that comes as part of the coastal flare pack
Lets be generous and say that gives me a capability to signal my distress for TWO minutes. Yep, two minutes. In reality nearer a minute and a half in fact
And the range at night isn't bad, maybe 25 miles, but in daytime it's less than 8 miles. And that's in good conditions. In fog or low cloud it could be drastically reduced
So I fire off a parachute flare and hope like hell that there's somebody looking my way within visual range in the next minute. Just in case I follow standard advice and fire a second one a few minutes later. That's it, I've shot all the shots in my locker. DId somebody see it? If they did, did they do something about it? If they did, can the emergency services find me based on the information received?
When it was the only option available it was the best we could do but compared to what modern technology can do for us it's frankly p!ssing in the wind!
The modern reality in coastal waters is to hit the distress button on the DSC VHF which transmits a digital distress alert complete with accurate position fix and optionally nature of distress which will be received and cause an alarm which must be acknowledged on every VHF receiver within range - that's going to be 10 miles or more to other vessels and 25 to 30 miles or more to shore stations
Instantly, the coastguard and every (responsible) vessel in the area is going to know that you're in trouble and exactly where you are. Doesn't matter if the officer on watch was marking up charts and the lookout had gone to the heads, doesn't need granny walking her dog along the beach and getting curious about the red firework. Instant, accurate and effective
Outside of VHF range of the shore, the VHF DSC distress alert still has a function to alert other vessels in the vicinity but the EPIRB/PLB comes into its own. Either automatically or manually activated, up it pops on a screen in Falmouth with the who you are and where you are. Help will be on its way toot sweet
Oh and the VHF DSC and EPIRB/PLB will go on working and sending a distress signal until the batteries are flat. At least 24 hours, 48 hours for an EPIRB or one of the new big PLBs
Aha you'll cry, I can hear you now, what if all the electrics fails? Or the mast falls down? Etc. etc.
C'mon! Realistically what are the actual chances of every single piece of electrical equipment dying? Virtually zero. If your luck is SO bad that even the battery powered gear like your PLB/EPIRB has fried then I'm afraid your goose is probably cooked! To be serious, the potential for it to happen is vanishingly small and comparable to the likelihood of all of your flares malfunctioning - it COULD happen but if your going to be that paranoid you'd probably be wise to stay in bed!
Mast down? Surely you have a backup VHF antenna on the stern rail and/or a hand held in the grab bag?
Main battery failure takes out the fixed VHF? Back to the hand held in the grab bag and/or the EPIRB/PLB
Final approach signally of exact location once the cavalry is within visual range? Odeo (or similar) laser flare
The one function the technology can't, yet (and it's hard to see how it could), replicate if not supercede is the daylight visual signal and wind strength and direction indicating capability of a smoke flare. The paraffin parrot pilots seem to manage well enough when they haven't got orange smoke from the target so I'm not going to worry about that. The "here I am, I'm the casualty" indication though is a matter to ponder however we're back to the laser flare again as it has a 3 mile plus visual range in daylight - surely enough to guide the SAR asset(s) to your precise location given that they are working off a GPS fix that's going to put them within a few hundred yards of you at worst
Let's be sensible about the Health and Safety thing too
H&S, away from the sensationalist newspaper arguments and the rantings of fools, is all about recognising and mitigating risk. Firing hand held pyrotechnics is risky. Simple as. Doing it for the very first time when you are cold, wet, scared out of your knickers and about to die? Takes it from risky to downright dangerous.
But with no alternative it was (is if you insist) a risk that has to be taken so you do what you can to mitigate it. You made sure you only carried in date flares - out of date flares have a higher and avoidable risk of failure. You briefed and if possible trained every member of your crew on the use of flares. You carried a stout glove in the flare container etc.
Arguably, and I would so argue, that is now a risk which can be eliminated rather than mitigated
And finally lets look at cost - although ideally cost would not enter into a safety equation in the real world it does
At a minimum (realistically) I would be purchasing a Coastal Flare Pack every three years at a cost of £99. Ideally I'd go for the offshore pack for double the bang for double the bucks - and I'd certainly need to go for that if I wanted anything even approaching the capability of the technical solutions
So compared to around £250 for a PLB, a bit under £200 for a hand held DSC VHF and £120 for a laser flare (all of which have at least a six year lifespan) the pyro flares work out cheaper but not a LOT cheaper
Plus by ditching pyros I don't have the hassle of trying to dispose of the old ones
I certainly don't think pyro flares should be or will be banned and I will still have some (in the liferaft) but I won't be purchasing and carrying flare packs again
You evidently haven't read all the posts on this thread.Surely most people are already aware of this. You seem to be having a one person argument.
Quite right.>Well said-my view exactly.
What Erbas said is nonsense as are many of the posts. Flares still have an important roll to play and always will. As said earlier good luck if you don't carry them and have to be rescued.
I thought that his post was very well thought through, but I accept that not everyone will agree with his comments.What Erbas said is nonsense as are many of the posts. Flares still have an important roll to play and always will. As said earlier good luck if you don't carry them and have to be rescued.
Not less important but not the first choice. They're as important as they ever were if the other options have failed.I thought that his post was very well thought through, but I accept that not everyone will agree with his comments.
I wonder if the pro-flare side of the discussion would accept that, because we have other gizmos nowadays, flares are now less important than they used to be?
That's right and if you don't carry them (in addition to DSC) and know how to use them you could be endangering your crew as well.>Well said-my view exactly.
What Erbas said is nonsense as are many of the posts. Flares still have an important roll to play and always will. As said earlier good luck if you don't carry them and have to be rescued.
I wonder if the pro-flare side of the discussion would accept that, because we have other gizmos nowadays, flares are now less important than they used to be?
No they are not less important, but we are lucky that there are more ways of calling for help these days.I thought that his post was very well thought through, but I accept that not everyone will agree with his comments.
I wonder if the pro-flare side of the discussion would accept that, because we have other gizmos nowadays, flares are now less important than they used to be?