Engine seacock strainer on hull

Cspirit

Active member
Joined
6 Feb 2004
Messages
374
Visit site
As above, and I should know the answer but I don't......

Which way round does this go, grill end forward or aft?




seacock-water-strainer-scoop-1-bsp-1423487258-l.jpg
 

Spirit (of Glenans)

Well-known member
Joined
28 Mar 2017
Messages
3,345
Location
Me; Nth County Dublin, Boat;Malahide
Visit site
I wouldn't have one of those, but if I did, I would fit it narrow end forward, on the basis that I feel that in that orientation, forward motion would ram water in, whereas with the grill aft there would be a suction effect, similar to the self-bailer in a dinghy or rib, reducing the delivery of water to the cooling system.
 

LadyInBed

Well-known member
Joined
2 Sep 2001
Messages
15,224
Location
Me - Zumerzet Boat - Wareham
montymariner.co.uk
I'd fit it grille aft, but I'd give it a miss; they grow things inside which can never be removed and likewise you can't get AF inside effectively to prevent them growing.
11.jpg
 

Tranona

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2007
Messages
42,776
Visit site
Beta specifically recommend a normal water intake with a ball valve and. an internal filter, preferably above the waterline. If an external strainer is fitted, the narrow end should face aft. Personally would not fit that type for all the reasons already mentioned.
 

wingcommander

Active member
Joined
25 Jul 2013
Messages
439
Visit site
I've just replaced a 1/2 " one with strainer like above with a regular 3/4"through hull and valve. Was always concerned about poor flow from exhaust and overheating. On removing the old i found it was 50% restricted with growth inside the ball valve. Now I can disconnect the hose from the raw water inlet of the strainer ( above water line ) and blow or poke right through even afloat. Also swapped out the strainer itself for a 3/4 plastic ebay version of a vetus . The original bronze 1/2" one was a pain to remove the lid , even after applying copious amounts of silicon grease to the seal.
 

BabaYaga

Well-known member
Joined
19 Dec 2008
Messages
2,495
Location
Sweden
Visit site
The strainer should face aft on a sail-boat but face forward on a motorboat.
+1.
As I understand, the argument is that the increased water pressure from a forward facing grill could, when sailing, force water past the impeller, into the silencer and potentially flood the engine.

I have this type, plastic strainer fastened by two small stainless bolts onto the flange of the brass through hull. Easily removed for cleaning and anti fouling on all sides:

BORDSGENOMFÖRING 3/4 M SIL
 

vyv_cox

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
25,986
Location
France, sailing Aegean Sea.
coxeng.co.uk
When we took the Canal du Midi from Bordeaux to the Mediterranean our engine skin fitting blocked with leaves about 100 times. Having an open skin fitting was invaluable for rodding through with a brazing rod. With a strainer outside the hull I cannot imagine how we could have got through.
 

superheat6k

Well-known member
Joined
10 Jan 2012
Messages
6,774
Location
South Coast
Visit site
Not having these near wrecked the engine on my Corvette when the inlet completely plugged with shiny fronds of floating weed. As I understand it the grill should be aft, the idea being the bull section nudges the weed aside and it passes clear, whereas the water freely floods in sans weed.

I have certainly never suffered an overheat with these things fitted !
 

TSB240

Well-known member
Joined
17 Feb 2010
Messages
3,254
Visit site
We have one on our engine inlet fitted with grill facing aft to prevent hydrolocking engine due to ram effect whilst sailing.

We also have one on our cooling inlet for the stern shaft. This faces forward to encourage pressurised flow into the stern shaft!

Neither were blocked by any growth after 23 years use.

We have an exhaust temperature alarm. JIC.
 

penfold

Well-known member
Joined
25 Aug 2003
Messages
7,729
Location
On the Clyde
Visit site
I'm not philosophically opposed to external strainers, they have their place particularly in specific local conditions like yours, but the non-removable nature of the one illustrated makes my teeth itch.
Not having these near wrecked the engine on my Corvette when the inlet completely plugged with shiny fronds of floating weed. As I understand it the grill should be aft, the idea being the bull section nudges the weed aside and it passes clear, whereas the water freely floods in sans weed.

I have certainly never suffered an overheat with these things fitted !
 
Top