stranded
Well-known member
I am converting our Jabsco Quietflush from fresh to seawater flush. I understand that it mY need an anti-siphon valve above the heeled waterline.
The loo is outboard amidships, so the natural place for the anti-siphon loop is stuck to the topsides. Trouble is, as we do occasionally dip our decks (not for long!), that would mean the loop would have to be above deck level, which is silly.
So the loop is going to have to be below the max heel waterline. The current freshwater intake has a loop with a solenoid about 3ft above the static waterline, which I assume is to stop the loo water siphoning back into the freshwater tanks?
That routing would be the simplest and neatest for the seawater intake as it would avoid having to butcher the furniture, and would be above the normal heeled waterline most of the time. There will be an electric pump between the seacock and the loop.
So my question is, how great is the actual risk of dangerous siphoning in situations where we would anyway want to correct excessive heel as soon as we can, which would presumably break the siphon? Would the presence of the pump reduce the risk? We could of course close the seacock. But this is awkward to access and potentially dangerous for limb, if not life, in conditions where we might need to. So would an easily accessible cut off valve at the top of the loop be seamanlike?
Or do I just suck it up
and get my butchery gear out?
The loo is outboard amidships, so the natural place for the anti-siphon loop is stuck to the topsides. Trouble is, as we do occasionally dip our decks (not for long!), that would mean the loop would have to be above deck level, which is silly.
So the loop is going to have to be below the max heel waterline. The current freshwater intake has a loop with a solenoid about 3ft above the static waterline, which I assume is to stop the loo water siphoning back into the freshwater tanks?
That routing would be the simplest and neatest for the seawater intake as it would avoid having to butcher the furniture, and would be above the normal heeled waterline most of the time. There will be an electric pump between the seacock and the loop.
So my question is, how great is the actual risk of dangerous siphoning in situations where we would anyway want to correct excessive heel as soon as we can, which would presumably break the siphon? Would the presence of the pump reduce the risk? We could of course close the seacock. But this is awkward to access and potentially dangerous for limb, if not life, in conditions where we might need to. So would an easily accessible cut off valve at the top of the loop be seamanlike?
Or do I just suck it up
