Laser310
Well-known member
I like the modern, Danish, aesthetic below - as long as they manage to not have sharp corners. I'm sure X-yachts have that sorted.
I've been on some newer boats that have incredibly sharp corners.., also no fiddles on the flat surfaces - I'm not sure some of the designers have ever been to sea...
I like the modern, Danish, aesthetic below - call it Ikea if you must, but i think it is soothing. Traditional interiors can be a bit oppressive and tiring after a few weeks - but this is a personal thing.
I'm sure the XC 45 was a comfortable boat for the ARC. That's a great passage that every sailor should try to do, in the ARC or not. Sure, you need to have the right boat, but the most important thing is the right crew. Unfortunately, the XC 45 is probably not a viable choice for me.
I am comforted to hear that the X-43 made it across - presumably they weren't asking for water when they were nearby?
with respect to the relative performance, it's worth noting that the XC 45 has 1.5m waterline length advantage on the X-43
I've been on some newer boats that have incredibly sharp corners.., also no fiddles on the flat surfaces - I'm not sure some of the designers have ever been to sea...
I like the modern, Danish, aesthetic below - call it Ikea if you must, but i think it is soothing. Traditional interiors can be a bit oppressive and tiring after a few weeks - but this is a personal thing.
I'm sure the XC 45 was a comfortable boat for the ARC. That's a great passage that every sailor should try to do, in the ARC or not. Sure, you need to have the right boat, but the most important thing is the right crew. Unfortunately, the XC 45 is probably not a viable choice for me.
I am comforted to hear that the X-43 made it across - presumably they weren't asking for water when they were nearby?
with respect to the relative performance, it's worth noting that the XC 45 has 1.5m waterline length advantage on the X-43
Last edited by a moderator: