PaulRainbow
Well-known member
In post #11 you said it was a fixed length. Historically, it's not fixed, as your quote above demonstrates. It only became a standard distance because we made it so.
Last edited:
Why do boats use nautical miles and why are they different than normal miles? Couldn't you just convert it to normal miles or km?
- Thread starter DangerousPirate
- Start date
In post #11 you said it was a fixed length. Historically, it's not fixed, as your quote above demonstrates. It only became a standard distance because we made it so.
AntarcticPilot
Well-known member
The first definition of the metre was a ten millionth of the distance between the equator and the pole. This was abandoned when it became apparent that the length of a degree of latitude changed with latitude (they're longer near the poles). But theoretically the metric system in conjunction with grads rather than degrees would work just as well as 1nm = 1' of latitude.
But grads (100 to a right angle) are one bit of the revolutionary units that didn't catch on. There's a reason - because 60 has far more factors than 10 or 100, it's easier to divide a circle in degrees.
But grads (100 to a right angle) are one bit of the revolutionary units that didn't catch on. There's a reason - because 60 has far more factors than 10 or 100, it's easier to divide a circle in degrees.
penberth3
Well-known member
Am I the first person to spot the mistake?
johnalison
Well-known member
There are other miles as well. The Swedish mile, as I nearly found out to my cost, is 10 Km.
Blue Seas
Member
'14 Knots and a Chinaman Sir' would not work in statute miles.
chriscallender
Active member
1 metre was originally defined as 1 ten millionth of the distance from the north pole to the equator on a line of longitude through Paris. So we could very well use metres or km and relate that pretty closely to lattitude changes on the chart (neglecting the fussy detail that the earth isn't a perfect sphere). Except that we don't divide up circles in nice decimal units to measure angles. If there were 400 degrees all the way around a circle, and 100 "sub degrees" in one degree then it would be pretty convenient to use km. According to google, the use of 360 degrees for circles goes back to about 300-200BC and we have the Babylonians and Greek astronomer Hipparchos of Rhodes to thank for that, so it predates (earth scale long distance) navigation, and the first navigators just used the angle units that were already available (which are nothing special).
DanTribe
Well-known member
Why can't we stick to the standard TV measurements.
Height= Nelson columns
length = London busses
area = football pitches or Isle of Wight
volume= olympic swimming pools
weight= elephants or jumbo jets.
Height= Nelson columns
length = London busses
area = football pitches or Isle of Wight
volume= olympic swimming pools
weight= elephants or jumbo jets.
colind3782
Well-known member
Just for fun I'll throw military compasses marked in "Mils" into the mix! 
MontyMariner
Well-known member
You beat me to it, I was also going to throw Mils into the discussionJust for fun I'll throw military compasses marked in "Mils" into the mix!
See Mils vs Degrees what's the difference I think it's a good read.
MontyMariner
Well-known member
Mils, not to be confused with Mills (grenades)
davidej
Well-known member
Coming from a scientific background, I would prefer to use Radians. I’m sure we could all cope with a circumnavigation covering 2 pi Radians ie 3.683183…..Rad
Daydream believer
Well-known member
When I took the family sailing to Ostend, in the new boat, for the first time we had no nav gear such as dividers etc. Neither did we have GPS. So I let them measures progress on the chart with a coke bottle top. I seem to recall that we crossed at something like 2 tops per hour with maxm tidal drift of half a top.
Last edited:
Buck Turgidson
Well-known member
The answer is because counting started on fingers and the Sumerians formalised writing in cuneiform on clay tablets so it caught on.
Left hand thumb points to the sections on each finger, 3 per finger, 4 fingers on left hand max number is 12 then one finger is raised on right hand and you start again. When 4 fingers and 1 thumb are raised on right hand you have reached 60.
Left hand thumb points to the sections on each finger, 3 per finger, 4 fingers on left hand max number is 12 then one finger is raised on right hand and you start again. When 4 fingers and 1 thumb are raised on right hand you have reached 60.
RunAgroundHard
Well-known member
Porthandbuoy
Well-known member
We should go back to Leagues. Makes an Atlantic crossing less intimidating as it's only around 800 Leagues rather than 2,400 miles (give or take).
AntarcticPilot
Well-known member
But unfortunately, "easy" points of the compass are irrational numbers when expressed in radians, being fractions of Pi! I don't think that saying "Steer 0.785398163397.. Radians" works as well as "Steer NorthEast" or "Steer 45° E"
Any internal calculation of trigonometric functions works in radians - indeed, you often have to convert to radians before using the trig functions in a computer language. That's why I know Pi to 8 significant figures without having to look it up!
doug748
Well-known member
Members of an advanced age will remember the back of old school exercise books:
Not a good image but nice to recall that 36lbs of Old Hay = 1 Truss. 36 Trusses = 1 Load
.
Not a good image but nice to recall that 36lbs of Old Hay = 1 Truss. 36 Trusses = 1 Load
.
Wansworth
Well-known member
No it’s elephants you fool
Daydream believer
Well-known member
No that is for trips by road, when you take a trunk roadNo it’s elephants you fool
Wansworth
Well-known member
If you want to be really exact…..it’s BlueWhales or football pitches,but elephants are easier to move