srm
Well-known member
If the Claw came out while the Bruce patent was still enforceable their only defence could be that it was different, ie different geometry or something significant.I have found the Lewmar Claw vs. Bruce differences ... just amazing. If you are going to flat out copy something, why do it wrong? The Bruce is pretty good. Very good at some things. The Claw is ... pretty much useless.
My first yacht charter was to a company making a promotional film for a revolutionary new anchor that could be fabricated from flat plate in any size from yacht up to oil rig. I took one look at it and said "that looks like an angular Bruce". The inventor then went into a long explanation about the difference in the geometry for angles of attack and penetration. It did not help him in court a year or so later, in fact he went to prison for contempt of court. The toy he tried to anchor my 42ft 10 ton displacement boat with was no use either. The diver filming it said the anchor started to dig in, then jumped out of the sea bed and disappeared. It probably saved the inventor from injury as the "experienced" yachtsman was holding the rope in his hands, not even surging it under a cleat.