DoubleEnder
Well-Known Member
Bargains to be hadBut has an interesting point about mortality. Long-keel yacht prices have crashed. Bit like 19th Century English watercolours and brown furniture.
Bargains to be hadBut has an interesting point about mortality. Long-keel yacht prices have crashed. Bit like 19th Century English watercolours and brown furniture.
Bargains to be had
See article in this month's PBO.
Umm.. After a very long time (42 years) with long keeled gaff cutters, I have just bought a "moderate fin and skeg" design from the 1960's - an Ohlson 38. The shape "looked right" to my eyes, whereas the shape of some modern "long keel" boats like the Vancouvers, the Island Packets and the Frances 26 all looked like fin keel boats with added wetted surface.
I've sailed an Olsen 38. Lovely boats with predictable handling that sail well.
Possibly because they are virtually long keelers![]()
I think you'll find an Ohlsen 38 is a fin and skeg with a good forefoot.
We can both roll eyes!
But I assume you were teasing.
The Ohlson 38 is a proper boat. More akin to a long keeler than a modern bolt on fin. So no wonder you consider them to be "Lovely boats with predictable handling that sail well"
http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=1817
I get the impression you haven't followed my arguments in this whole thread.
Or are we going to get into the game of people saying that any fin keeled boat that has decent manners is really a long keeled boat in disguise. Are we going to start suggesting some of the 70's Nicholson's with fin keels are really 'long keeled'? How about a Sigma 33(C) or a Contessa 32. Both have lovely sailing characters but both are fin...!
No I'm just saying (again) that the Ohlson 38 is more akin to to a long keeler than a modern fin.
![]()
If you want to say its not a fin keel and it makes you happy, then fill your boots. I suggest that picture doesn't tell the whole story. Try looking at the sections...
What I will readily agree to is that she was part of the development of more modern yacht design. She was from an age where designers realised that they could make any shape they wanted with this modern GRP (not being stuck with long bits of wood that didn't lend themselves to wine glass hulls with keels that can be made into NACA sections and bolted on.)
I didn't deny it was a fin keeler I said it was more akin to a long keeler than a modern fin.

Seems easy enough to grasp.
Even in 2012 I worried about this thread. The title seemed to suggest we had been under assault by evangelical long keel sailors. I hadn't noticed it if we were.
A better question might be: Why are we fascinated by cruising boats that look like this:
View attachment 60820
Courtesy Beneteau
That keel must be some use on a cruising boat because people seem to by buying them.
But no, I won't be starting a new thread on the matter :nonchalance:
Hopefully because the boat goes well and the owner enjoys sailing it.Seems easy enough to grasp.
Even in 2012 I worried about this thread. The title seemed to suggest we had been under assault by evangelical long keel sailors. I hadn't noticed it if we were.
A better question might be: Why are we fascinated by cruising boats that look like this:
View attachment 60820
Courtesy Beneteau
That keel must be some use on a cruising boat because people seem to by buying them.
But no, I won't be starting a new thread on the matter :nonchalance:
I think some of the posts extolling the virtues of long keels have been evangelical in their zeal. I just wanted people to be abut more open minded.
You could begin with yourself.
In the OP you asked what people liked about long keels, calling their liking fascination, which rather telegraphs your own view, to which you are entitled BTW.
They tell you what they perceive as qualities, and you relentlessly tell them they are mistaken.
You have not given an inch since the start.
Have you read all my posts on the subject?
Yes.
Since the thread started, and looked thru them all again each time the thread was rebooted.
And my overall impression is that you are pursuing your rebuttal of views "extolling the virtues" with zeal second to none of the "evangelists".
I say again, you did ask for their views.
Isn't this yachting's equivalent of the "how many angels can dance on the head of the pin" argument; and just as pointless? (The argument I mean, not the pin(...) I still think it's an argument worth fighting for.