There will be records of water temperatures, so the relevance of GW is either true or not, so there is little point in speculating, though when I let go of the tree and scratched my head the same thought came to me. In the Ijselmeer, or rather Markermeer, the heavy weed growth of recent years has been attributed to fertiliser concentrations, I believe. I suppose this could be possible locally too but I don't know much about farming.More arguments for the global-warming tree-huggers to try to use.
I am not a farmer, but I understand that modern arable farming uses a high tech approach to application of fertilisers that goes something like this.
The relative fertility of the land is measured in a spatial sense using aerial photographs, this is then calibrated by taking a few soil samples. From these two measurements the absolute fertility and amount of fertiliser required for each small area of the farm can be calculated. This data is loaded into the high tech fertiliser spreader which also drives the tractor (on Autopilot using GPS) to apply exactly the required amount of fertiliser in each part of each field. The attraction for the farmer is reduced use of fertiliser leading to reduced cost while still getting the optimum crop - or that's what the sellers of the high tech kit claim. They also claim that the reduced use of fertiliser is ecologically helpful.
As I say, I'm not a farmer so I have no idea whether it really works.
More than you or I would think. Arable farming is a highly automated business these days, employing very few per acre.It will work, but how many farmers have the appropriate kit?
From conversations with farmers I know, I think that only the very biggest own their own specialized machinery these days - they sub-contract for the various seasonal jobs. The labour force on most middling sized farms is the farmer and no-one else.It will work, but how many farmers have the appropriate kit?
A seal a Whale??On Monday I was setting up my computer kit and nav kit in preparation for the next day (I can never remember all the settings ? ) and I left the Fishfinder on while we sat on the mooring. In 15ft of water under the boat and on the FF a huge, no, a HUGE thing of 'summat' passed by on the flood. The 'summat' - weed? - eased along the bottom but extended above the 5ft line! And if the length = the height, it was 10ft long. Couple of fish on the top of the 'summat' according to the FF. Did NOT like the look of that. Shame I hadn't got the recording on. The OP's weed was around a little in the Estuary.