Volvo penta electronically controlled engines over 15 years old ECU’s not supported making boats worthless

Ron the boater

New member
Joined
15 Nov 2016
Messages
21
Visit site
Exactly Scala but with a dedicated thread maybe Volvo might take notice

If Volvo penta treat any engine over 15 years old as electronically obsolete that follows for every engine they currently make making the boats without vast investment worthless

And seeing as every engine is computer controlled in 15 years or so that is the expected life span
 

Portofino

Well-known member
Joined
10 Apr 2011
Messages
12,168
Location
Boat- Western Med
Visit site
As I said in the linked thread it’s up to someone to see the future business opportunity and break down the barriers ( which may be weak anyhow ) with VP to manufacture after market parts .
Not necessarily “ approved “ more like not contested , kinda blind eye turned because it means the parent co can maintain focus on the day job , which evolves .

I would do it myself but unlike mr Remington I do not like the product so no interest in “ buying the company “ so to speak .
Needs a can do and put up or shut up attitude.Not whinging .
 

petem

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
18,651
Location
Cotswolds / Altea
www.fairlineownersclub.com
I doubt that the thousands of boat owners who have engines that rely on a supply of these ECU's would be prepared to just bin their engines. In fact, VP discontinuing these ECU's is likely to give some enterprising person the incentive to take a cheap off the shelf programmable ECU and reverse engineer the software onto it (the ECU wiring diagrams and specs are in the workshop manuals). Despite that, Volvo appear to have confirmed that they will manufacture a fresh block (and when they retail for £3-4k, they'd be pretty stupid not to).
 

scottie

Well-known member
Joined
14 Nov 2001
Messages
5,311
Location
scotland
Visit site
I argued man years ago with senior Volvo management that the number of owners scrapping engines due to the exorbitant prices of basic spares for not very old engines was building a resentment against replacing with Volvo allowing Beta etc to build a strong customer base to the extent that they are now major competitors
 

Bouba

Well-known member
Joined
6 Sep 2016
Messages
38,363
Location
SoF
Visit site
I argued man years ago with senior Volvo management that the number of owners scrapping engines due to the exorbitant prices of basic spares for not very old engines was building a resentment against replacing with Volvo allowing Beta etc to build a strong customer base to the extent that they are now major competitors
What was the Volvo’s guy’s attitude to your suggestion? I’m planning to write to Volvo to complain about their local car dealer ripping me off. I want to know if it’s worth it
 

penberth3

Well-known member
Joined
9 Jun 2017
Messages
3,412
Visit site
What was the Volvo’s guy’s attitude to your suggestion? I’m planning to write to Volvo to complain about their local car dealer ripping me off. I want to know if it’s worth it

Cars and VP are different companies, aren't they?
 

oldgit

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2001
Messages
27,548
Location
Medway
Visit site
Suspect this (and the other thread)are the tip of an old ongoing iceberg.
Chum of mine with a Phantom 46 sold his boat after a period of an engine cutting out and going into limp mode..
It was not just when the faulty ECU was finally diagnosed but the long and desperate attempts at all the other possible causes of for the engine cutting out half way across the "Med".
This included hard wiring various connections/couplings, cleaning out fuel tanks and assorted other vain attempts to sort the problem
A cure was possibly found when the ECU was bought back to the UK.
Not sure wether it was a secondhand ECU or some sort of reprogramme that returned back down to Majorca but it seemed to solve the problem.
However, by now my mate had totally lost faith in the boat and sold it on as soon as he could.
Doubt he recouped much of the money spend over the previous couple of years trying to identify the problem.
The wasted time and stress was the final straw.
 
Last edited:

scottie

Well-known member
Joined
14 Nov 2001
Messages
5,311
Location
scotland
Visit site
Yes
What was the Volvo’s guy’s attitude to your suggestion? I’m planning to write to Volvo to complain about their local car dealer ripping me off. I want to know if it’s worth it
they knew what they were doing and thank you but no change I suppose that at that time inflation was a major component in costing and was automatically applied to prices which with older parts just made them unreasonable
 

Momac

Well-known member
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Messages
6,706
Location
UK
Visit site
Doubt he recouped much of the money spend over the previous couple of years trying to identify the problem.
The wasted time and stress was the final straw.
Was that Volvo Pentas fault that the source of the problem was not identified earlier ?
 

petem

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
18,651
Location
Cotswolds / Altea
www.fairlineownersclub.com
I argued man years ago with senior Volvo management that the number of owners scrapping engines due to the exorbitant prices of basic spares for not very old engines was building a resentment against replacing with Volvo allowing Beta etc to build a strong customer base to the extent that they are now major competitors
If you look at the engines affected by this ECU issue (that actually seems to be an non-issue) , despite the thousands that have been sold there are very few, if any, actually being scrapped. In fact, I believe that my engines and drives would be worth more now on the second hand market than Farline paid for them in 2002.

Also, there's a element of safety in numbers. There are thousands of engines of this vintage out there and there are now lots of pattern parts appearing that offer great value for money (raw water pumps, heat exchangers, turbos, gasket sets, exhaust elbows, etc).

And I've never heard of a KAD42/3/4/300/TAMD73/4/5 actually wearing out.
 

petem

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
18,651
Location
Cotswolds / Altea
www.fairlineownersclub.com
I argued man years ago with senior Volvo management that the number of owners scrapping engines due to the exorbitant prices of basic spares for not very old engines was building a resentment against replacing with Volvo allowing Beta etc to build a strong customer base to the extent that they are now major competitors
I've never heard of Beta!
 

oldgit

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2001
Messages
27,548
Location
Medway
Visit site
Was that Volvo Pentas fault that the source of the problem was not identified earlier ?


He engaged a number of local engineers and companies to investigate the problem, most recommended by the local Fairline dealer on the island at the time . (Peters ) ?
Assume that who ever plugged the VODIA was an genuine VP dealer.
The only way the boat could get back home was to turn everything off and on again to restart engines.
This apparently erases all the fault codes ? so nothing useful displayed when the code reader was plugged in.
Do know the first action was to change all filters etc and check nothing blocking fuel pick ups, checks for air leaks etc, lift pump was then changed.
Tanks were inspected and cleaned out , not sure if inspection hatches already there or if holes had to be cut.
Electronic contacts of all sorts cleaned and wring checked for faults/abrasion.
Various attempts were made to change relays and hardwire connectors and plugs to see if that solved the problem with no luck.
Eventually it was decided the a ECU was at fault but new one was not an option.
The problem was possibly sorted after he contacted Coastal Rides and they suggested he bring it back to UK for them to look at.
After their attentions it was refitted.
All seemed to be be OK but he had lost all faith in the boat and had no intention of it failing on him again.
It worked OK on the sea trial with the broker and new owner.


Might have helped if fault codes were retained in a log ?
 
Top