Anthony3200
New Member
No, not at all - my mind is definitely not made up and, in fact, is 80% against the idea, following the responses here.
What has surprised me in all of this is just how much money Sunsail makes from the deal and how little is passed on.
For myself, the main purpose behind investigating the scheme was that I would use the boat pretty much full-on in 5.5. years time. I figured, perhaps incorrectly, that a 5.5. year boat would be cheaper by buying it via Sunsail (and getting others to subsidise my purchase) and that the sacrifice I would make in not using or seeing the boat for several years would repay itself in a cheap boat at the end of it. I had, to be honest, expected Sunsail to pay more of the revenue back to the charterer than it does, which makes the scheme pretty unfeasible.
What has surprised me in all of this is just how much money Sunsail makes from the deal and how little is passed on.
For myself, the main purpose behind investigating the scheme was that I would use the boat pretty much full-on in 5.5. years time. I figured, perhaps incorrectly, that a 5.5. year boat would be cheaper by buying it via Sunsail (and getting others to subsidise my purchase) and that the sacrifice I would make in not using or seeing the boat for several years would repay itself in a cheap boat at the end of it. I had, to be honest, expected Sunsail to pay more of the revenue back to the charterer than it does, which makes the scheme pretty unfeasible.