Studland - MMO Management protocols for the MCZ in place from 17th December

Tranona

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2007
Messages
42,368
Visit site
In Studland perhaps the biggest threat to the seagrass is the early year easterly gales which deposit huge amount of dislodged seagrass on the beach. Of course it is cold and often wet when that happens - not conducive to visits from Ecos! My dogs used to love it.
 

Boathook

Well-known member
Joined
5 Oct 2001
Messages
8,876
Location
Surrey & boat in Dorset.
Visit site
In Studland perhaps the biggest threat to the seagrass is the early year easterly gales which deposit huge amount of dislodged seagrass on the beach. Of course it is cold and often wet when that happens - not conducive to visits from Ecos! My dogs used to love it.
I seem to remember that the seahorse hugger used a picture of the stuff piled up after an easterly gale claiming that it was anchor damage.
 

Tranona

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2007
Messages
42,368
Visit site
I seem to remember that the seahorse hugger used a picture of the stuff piled up after an easterly gale claiming that it was anchor damage.
May well have done. The one who started the cute photos has now turned his attention to sharks - not so cute but dramatic enough to make the Telegraph creature of the day photo recently.
 

oldharry

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
9,946
Location
North from the Nab about 10 miles
Visit site
I feel sorry for the sharks getting all the unwanted attention !
Yes, but they can bite back.... If seahorses were scaled up to shark size they would be almost as dangerous. At their level they are super stealth predators, masters of camouflage and highly lethal to their prey, very far from the cuddly little creatures Disney makes them out to be.

As far as Seahorse Hugger in chief goes, he seems to be increasingly out of favour in the ongoing debate. One can only guess why. The Shark interest comes from Dr Ken Collins who worked with NGM trying to give credibility to their claims. Dr Collins is a shark expert.
 
Last edited:

Lodestone

Active member
Joined
11 Apr 2021
Messages
147
Visit site
MAGA - Make Anchoring Go Away. With all the logic and behaviour of Marjorie Taylor Greene the pro-VNAZ lobby ploughs on. "Its not us who have to prove anything it's you!" and woe betide anyone who can actually hoist them on the petard of their own words .
;)
 
Last edited:

doug748

Well-known member
Joined
1 Oct 2002
Messages
13,311
Location
UK. South West.
Visit site
Has anyone completed the survey? If it is skewed with leading questions like the others I won't bother. If there is an opportunity to make real comment I will give it a go.
 

Jonny A

Active member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
261
Location
Poole
Visit site
I just completed it, and I would encourage everyone else to do so. It has options that include 'I am unwilling to observe the voluntary no anchor zone' and gives you space to explain why.
 

chrishscorp

Well-known member
Joined
4 Jan 2015
Messages
2,206
Location
Live in Fareham Area, Boat in Gosport
Visit site
Having read through all the blurb these charlies have posted and intimated over the last 6-7 years, the last one I filled out I made it very clear that I thought one of the real threats was the use of powered craft operating inshore at speeds way in excess of 5 knots using the eco moorings as a slalom course with their little sports boats, jet skies and ribs. Its only a matter of time before one of them hits someone in the water or someone tendering ashore, let alone disturbance to the wildlife and all this in a supposed 5 kt restricted area
 

ImpImp

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2023
Messages
52
Visit site
Tried to keep it brief in answer to the last question "There does not seem to have been any attempt to explain why, since seagrass coverage expanded significantly prior to the VNAZ, a VNAZ is required."
 

doug748

Well-known member
Joined
1 Oct 2002
Messages
13,311
Location
UK. South West.
Visit site
Have any of you chaps seen this in the news last week.

Largest UK seagrass restoration project to end after five years

I think this one is more interesting... Only £2.5m wasted


Yes. Fact is Natural England's own surveys previously failed to find any problems with the seagrass around Plymouth, so God knows on what basis they now find an improvement. It starts to look like the usual: - if the Science does not suit, make it up and call it a precaution.

They seem to have decided that seagrass had declined in an huge area of Jennycliff Bay. Despite reseeding a very large area, and a voluntary anchor ban nothing happened. No doubt they anticipated a huge success but it seems seagrass only wants to grow in areas that suit it, with or without leisure boat anchoring.

.
 

Jonny A

Active member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
261
Location
Poole
Visit site
This all reminds me of the time the local bus company wanted to stop residents parking along a busy street because it was 'delaying the buses'. I went to the public consultation meeting and asked, 'What data do you have on what the current average delay is, and what improvement do you expect? Will the decision be reversed if there is no significant improvement?' They looked at me like I was from Mars. No understanding of how to use data, let alone any intention to follow it. Luckily it was thrown out purely for political reasons.
 
Top