Studland - MMO Management protocols for the MCZ in place from 17th December

alahol2

Well-known member
Joined
22 Apr 2004
Messages
5,833
Location
Portchester, Solent
www.troppo.co.uk
Just visiting Studland for the first time since they laid all the myriad eco-moorings... What an absolutely appalling aesthetic tragedy they have created. Only 6 boats but God knows how many dozens of white mooring buoys totally ruining what was a near pristine seascape.
 

Seven Spades

Well-known member
Joined
30 Aug 2003
Messages
4,779
Location
Surrey
Visit site
Yes and the 10 tons maximum is not adequate for most boats. A 36 foot Westerly weighs 10 tons it is utter madness. Why are there no bouys for larger vessels. If they had laid buyos capable of taking 30/40 tons like salcombe all boats could have been accomodated and few buoys would have been needed as boats could double up or more.
 

oldharry

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
9,922
Location
North from the Nab about 10 miles
Visit site
Just visiting Studland for the first time since they laid all the myriad eco-moorings... What an absolutely appalling aesthetic tragedy they have created. Only 6 boats but God knows how many dozens of white mooring buoys totally ruining what was a near pristine seascape.
This is the knock-on effect of misguided 'eco warriors' that we and many locals fought against. All that extra plastic in the sea..... As you rightly say an aesthetic tragedy, turning beautiful Studland into a marine car park without a shred of evidence that it will in any way help marine life.
 

chrishscorp

Well-known member
Joined
4 Jan 2015
Messages
2,202
Location
Live in Fareham Area, Boat in Gosport
Visit site
This is the knock-on effect of misguided 'eco warriors' that we and many locals fought against. All that extra plastic in the sea..... As you rightly say an aesthetic tragedy, turning beautiful Studland into a marine car park without a shred of evidence that it will in any way help marine life.

The seahorses may infact like the 88 new shiny elastic bungy cords, it would be great to get a picture of a pair of them hanging off one them 'courting'
 

Boathook

Well-known member
Joined
5 Oct 2001
Messages
8,422
Location
Surrey & boat in Dorset.
Visit site
Just visiting Studland for the first time since they laid all the myriad eco-moorings... What an absolutely appalling aesthetic tragedy they have created. Only 6 boats but God knows how many dozens of white mooring buoys totally ruining what was a near pristine seascape.
Did you use the sippi app to pay for the mooring or did you anchor ?

The app has appalling reviews and I read somewhere that the directors are also directors of a parking inforcement company, so a win win for them!
 

alahol2

Well-known member
Joined
22 Apr 2004
Messages
5,833
Location
Portchester, Solent
www.troppo.co.uk
Did you use the sippi app to pay for the mooring or did you anchor ?

The app has appalling reviews and I read somewhere that the directors are also directors of a parking inforcement company, so a win win for them!
No, I was going to anchor but we would have been so far out that the row ashore would have been a struggle. In the end we picked up one of the buoys provided by the Bankes Arms.
 

dunedin

Well-known member
Joined
3 Feb 2004
Messages
13,524
Location
Boat (over winters in) the Clyde
Visit site

Pete7

Well-known member
Joined
11 Aug 2004
Messages
4,085
Location
Gosport
Visit site
This is the knock-on effect of misguided 'eco warriors' that we and many locals fought against. All that extra plastic in the sea..... As you rightly say an aesthetic tragedy, turning beautiful Studland into a marine car park without a shred of evidence that it will in any way help marine life.
I got the impression the cute little seahorses issue is slowly being dropped because they are very common and everywhere in Poole bay. Instead NE et al are latching on to carbon sequestration. If this works, vastly more money from the Gov making them look good and huge areas of the Solent open for grabs.
 

Tranona

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2007
Messages
42,020
Visit site
Seahorses have always been common, not just in Poole but all around the coast, mainly to the west and particularly in man made environments like marinas and harbours where they can be easily observed. In the early days SHT had a reporting system for logging observations from volunteers which clearly showed this. It was part of the campaign to get protection, but once that was achieved publication stopped and SHT changed tack. The Studland fiasco started because it was a field study site for uni students attracted by the shallow water, easy diving and one academics interest in seagrasses. Once a photo of one of the sweet creatures was taken by a local "conservationist" the groundwork was laid for the political campaign supported by the gullible media.

As you say, next fad is carbon capture, again based on dodgy science - but it really isn't anything new. History is dotted with fads based on dodgy science.
 

oldharry

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
9,922
Location
North from the Nab about 10 miles
Visit site
Tranona is right: in the course of the BORG campaign I came across ample first hand evidence that seahorses are quite common round UK coasts. Rarely seen because 'researchers' will not go out to where they live. They would have to go out to deep cold and dangerous waters tosee them. Much easier and nicer to go paddling in Studland!

Looking for a small well camouflaged creature in 20-30m of murky water is nothing like as much fun!
 

Pete7

Well-known member
Joined
11 Aug 2004
Messages
4,085
Location
Gosport
Visit site
I've read you have to sink the seaweed in the deep ocean to stop it re-releasing its CO2 as it dies. Are they going to do that?
Countryfile last Sunday showed a seaweed farm producing 120 tonne pa yield for consumption and they hope to increase this. We are not disposing of it, but going to eat it.

Just think, make it taste like a Maccy D's and that's a win because you don't need mad cows producing methane, another green house gas.

Perhaps we could harvest seaweed from Studland in return for the £10 a night with a two Aldi bag limit per person, bit like lobsters 🥹 That should give the MMO and NE something to chew on :ROFLMAO:
 

benjenbav

Well-known member
Joined
12 Aug 2004
Messages
15,209
Visit site
Tranona is right: in the course of the BORG campaign I came across ample first hand evidence that seahorses are quite common round UK coasts. Rarely seen because 'researchers' will not go out to where they live. They would have to go out to deep cold and dangerous waters tosee them. Much easier and nicer to go paddling in Studland!

Looking for a small well camouflaged creature in 20-30m of murky water is nothing like as much fun!
I have been reading the various quango reports which you’ve kindly linked.

I think the sailing community owes thanks to you and your colleagues, inasmuch as it seems a very sensible outcome to have a voluntary no anchor zone.

If the VNAZ is largely observed there should be much better data available to future studies to demonstrate whether anchoring in the relevant area does or does not have an impact on sea grass, albeit that it is clearly just one of a number of factors that could have an impact.

The tone of the latest studies suggests that minds may be more open than in the past. Although perhaps you may feel that you have had to drag officialdom kicking and screaming to this position…
 

macxman

New member
Joined
14 Nov 2023
Messages
2
Visit site
Seems to me that Natural England have failed to notice the damaging effect of algae blooms in and around Poole Harbour. The recent rains have washed agricultural run-off into the catchment causing blanket weed to choke the water. A month ago this area was clean sand. This happens regularly around the UK after heavy rain and is largely ignored but it is devastating to marine life.
20 years ago we used to anchor at this spot in Poole Harbour and watch the photo-luminescent plankton after dark. The show then was startling. Bit by bit it has reduced and I have not seen it for the past 4/5 years. Agricultural run-off is the likely cause of the decline.
Anchoring boats are an easy target and proves to the general public that "something is being done" to "protect the environment" but as soon often is the case it's a gimmick solution not based on proper science.
 

doug748

Well-known member
Joined
1 Oct 2002
Messages
13,143
Location
UK. South West.
Visit site
Seems to me that Natural England have failed to notice the damaging effect of algae blooms in and around Poole Harbour. The recent rains have washed agricultural run-off into the catchment causing blanket weed to choke the water. A month ago this area was clean sand. This happens regularly around the UK after heavy rain and is largely ignored but it is devastating to marine life.
20 years ago we used to anchor at this spot in Poole Harbour and watch the photo-luminescent plankton after dark. The show then was startling. Bit by bit it has reduced and I have not seen it for the past 4/5 years. Agricultural run-off is the likely cause of the decline.
Anchoring boats are an easy target and proves to the general public that "something is being done" to "protect the environment" but as soon often is the case it's a gimmick solution not based on proper science.

Indeed. Three things are never mentioned:

* The effects of the run off of farming chemicals - as you say.

* The effects of sewage outfall after rainfall and consequent chemical pollution.

* The effects of seagrass disease, which has had the effect of perverting the commonly presented figures for decline.

The media print the easy story and follow the narrative. Our "experts" play the game and perpetuate nonsense to keep the issue at eye level.

.
 
Top