stranded
Well-known member
Sadly, if Covid taught us anything, it is that there is no class of person who can be entrusted to exercise discretionary power wisely. So we would be wise to give them as little power as possible, and keep a very close eye on their exercise of those powers they do claim to have.Recently we were discussing safety at sea and stupid decisions that resulted in the loss of lives. I wondered if anyone on this forum ever came across a situation when the decision for a ship leaving port was considered more or less suicidal because of that particular crew on that particular ship in that particular (weather) situation. Such a decision not only affects the crew itself, but amongst others also the RNLI who will have to put their people at risk in a potential rescue attempt. In advance of course nobody knows the outcome of such a decision which can be positive out of sheer luck. Also there is this "who are you to prevent me from leaving port". Legally it is not always possible to prevent a (non-commercial) ship from leaving port, but there are these rare cases when it would be "better for everyone" when a ship can be stopped at the sole discretion of e.g. a harbour master. Stopped as in more than a recommendation, but halted against the will of the skipper. "Discretion" obviously implies a grey area, just as deciding on the (in)sanity of a skippers decision. Great explorers made insane decisions just as well.
Basically this boils down to the question if people on non-commercial boats with little or no experience can be protected by others from "insane decisions" and if so where do we draw the line? Or do we consider every decision as their choice no matter the outcome?