Solar arch design

Yngmar

Well-Known Member
Joined
6 Dec 2012
Messages
3,091
Location
Gone cruising
Visit site
It's time to design the solar arch. For the rest of it, I've stared at my battery monitor a lot in port and under sail and applied high end mathematics like division and multiplication and concluded I want at least 400 W, and won't mind a bit more if it happens to fit up there. Haven't picked panels yet, as that'll depend largely on the shape of the arch about to be designed. Controller shall be a Victron MPPT just because it seems to work and while I don't mind being product tester for less important stuff, in this case it makes sense for me to buy something proven and reliable. But this thread is all about the arch.

Luckily there's a great stainless guy here in Brighton whom I trust to build the thing as well as it can be built. But how should it be designed?

I've had a look around image search and there's some that fit the boats well, and some that look horrid and extend a meter aft of the aft most part of the transom (do these people never go into marinas?). There's also a worrying but understandable tendency to tack as much stuff as possible onto them, leading to a solar-davit-outboard-crane-ladder-windvane-radar-generator-fishcuttingboard-seat with fore and aft rigging and clamps on the backstay to keep it from collapsing into a pile of bent steel under its own weight.

Speaking of which, should it even be made of stainless steel at all? I've seen a few made of aluminium, which is certainly good to keep the boat from getting too top heavy. But then how do you treat that to protect it so it won't all crumble to white dust in a few years and blow away?

Should it be welded/clamped to the existing pushpit or bolted next to it? Upside is the stern looks less busy and not so much additional weight, plus fewer holes to bolt it through, but if it ever gets bent or needs removing, that's a bunch of extra stuff to undo. Also the existing pushpit isn't mounted all that sturdily and may want a set of extra legs then.

Then where to mount it best? The toerail is really the only option, because just inboard of it there are two lazarette lids with hinges on the outboard edge of the deck. The toerail is made of teak and covers the deck/hull joint, through which the stanchions and pushpit/pulpit are bolted through. It isn't a very good solution for stanchions, they wobble aplenty, but I think it may be okay for something that is supported on at least four points. Where the stanchion studs are, the teak has a large hole, so the stud sits on the GRP and not directly on the (more compressible) teak.

How strong do these things have to be so they don't get bent or ripped off in a blow, with 4+ big (1m long side or larger) panels on them and the boat heeling? I also assume it's a good idea to make them at least strong enough so a fat bloke can climb up and clean the bird droppings off the panels regularly.

The standard design appears to be two arches joined by horizontal bars, which double as climbing steps, much like this.

Your input is welcome!

Here's a view of the stern from a broker photo (same model as mine, but without horseshoes blocking the view):
250031_3e.jpg
 
No good answers but as I've been pondering the same thing I'll be following this thread with interest. A guy who is a skilled craftsman in steel is *not necessarily* a skilled naval architect and in my limited experience a professional naval architect, even the company that designed your own boat isn't necessarily cost effective or interested in commissions for things like arch design or inner forestay placement. My worry is how a big steel arch affects the balance of the boat and stresses that will be transferred to the securing points especially as you say, when loaded with big solar panels with all their windage in a blow.
 
Don't do it! Why spoil the look of the boat, make it heavier and slow it down. Fit them to the guardrail and take them off when you don't need them. I have never seen a set of monkey bars that has enhanced the look of a yacht
 
I agree with GEEM - whatever design you come up with the boat will not appreciate it - I was going down the same road but having looked at loads of options have now settled to fit 2 x 100W panels on the rail - a bit like this IMG_20151121_105714-Large.jpg
 
Here is the basic design of my solar arch during building

WEB0585_zps3bc89fb8.jpg


and after launch.

IMGP1682_zpsd7b20edf.jpg


People have commented on the fittings blocking the solar panels but this way round (stern facing north) I get better output than when the bow faces north due to the shadow of the mast on the panel.
Note we are in to southern hemisphere.
 
I agree with GEEM - whatever design you come up with the boat will not appreciate it - I was going down the same road but having looked at loads of options have now settled to fit 2 x 100W panels on the rail - a bit like this View attachment 56915

I kind of agree, all boats look better without anything on the back end, but as with everything on boats some compromise is always required and we felt this was the least offensive.

If you're interested in more info on the pic look here..... http://syneraida.com/installing-solar/ it works fine for us and when mooring med style or along side a wall they simply fold down alongside the pushpit rail.
 
@syneraida - sorry to divert the thread a bit but was there a good reason to mount a framed solar panel on a tubular frame - I have been toying with this idea ?

025180be89329c95b1e6005ef70e2104.jpg
 
Don't do it! Why spoil the look of the boat, make it heavier and slow it down. Fit them to the guardrail and take them off when you don't need them. I have never seen a set of monkey bars that has enhanced the look of a yacht
I disagree, an arch gives a yacht a serious bluewater look. Also arches are the preferred solution for perpose designed expedition yachts.

Temporary gardrail solar panel setups give a yacht a low budget trampship image IMHO.

As to the weight, i guess we are talking 10m to 15m of anchor chain, it might even balance up the trim.
 
@syneraida - sorry to divert the thread a bit but was there a good reason to mount a framed solar panel on a tubular frame - I have been toying with this idea ?

View attachment 56917

we chose to mount the panel on a tubular frame simply because we felt that when you got to the size of a 100w panel it needed a bit of support and its really easy to get and use bimini fittings for 22 or 25mm tube. Finaly we can slide the diagonal support inboard or outboard to adjust the angle of the panels according to the tack or direction of the sun (although we rarely bother).
 
I disagree, an arch gives a yacht a serious bluewater look. Also arches are the preferred solution for perpose designed expedition yachts.

Temporary gardrail solar panel setups give a yacht a low budget trampship image IMHO.

As to the weight, i guess we are talking 10m to 15m of anchor chain, it might even balance up the trim.

I guess there are two kind of monkey bars ugly ones and really ugly ones!
You will never convince me that they give a blue water look. Most look more like a badly built house extension IMHO.
Why would you want to add all that windage and weight? If you are really blue water sailing and you have to deal with a big storm it is highly likely that you will lose half your gear. Proper expedition yachts may have a radar arch but they don't stick 400w of solar up there that would be smashed off in a storm.
If you need to build a house extension on your boat then really you need a bigger boat!
 
Thanks for all the comments and pictures so far, keep them coming.

I'm pretty sold on the arch. I've looked at other options, but it seems the most sensible. Mounting 400W on the pushpit is not possible, as there isn't enough pushpit for that, and I dislike the high risk of damage to expensive and fragile panels.

As for weight, the boat is currently a bit light on the stern, so this might improve balance.

Still looking for some insight on the questions originally asked.
 
I agree with GEEM - whatever design you come up with the boat will not appreciate it - I was going down the same road but having looked at loads of options have now settled to fit 2 x 100W panels on the rail - a bit like this View attachment 56915

We have them mounted inside the guard rails. We have a centre cockpit and they really do not upset access much - but are vulnerable to someone falling on to them.

We have come across other boats in the Med with panels on the outside, and they really are a problem when coming alongside stern too. They are extremely vulnerable.
 
Yngmar.. We have a similar project and I would be very very interested to know who is the stainless guy you are using.
thanks...
 
I'll recommend him after he's done mine, as he's far too busy as it is ;-)

Meanwhile, I've spent more thought and time looking around and have sketched something on top of photos of my boat. At the moment it looks like the below, but I'm not entirely happy yet. It would look a lot neater if it were integrated with or replacing the pushpit rather than in addition to it, although the engineer recommends against this (and it would also increase the already hefty cost quite a bit).

Another problem is where to fix it. As there are lazarette doors opening outwards on either corner of the aft deck, it can really only be bolted through the toe rail, same as the stanchions (by drilling a hole in the teak and bolting the arch into the GRP coaming underneath, same as the stanchions). A slim backing bar can then be inserted from underneath (the area is accessible with some gymnastics from inside the lazarettes).

Additional restrictions apply as the mooring cleats mustn't be obstructed by the legs of the arch, so the legs can only be aft of the rear pushpit leg and either forward (my preference due to giving the arch it a wider stance) or directly aft of the forward pushpit leg.

solar_scribbles2.png
 
If you are considering a wind vane steering, look at the clearance for the vane. I didn't. :-(

Good point, although if you look at my transom it's extremely ill suited for wind vane steering anyways, and I don't want to do what a sistership of mine did:

bomika_sternclutter.jpg


They've been around the world in it and I'm sure had good reasons for bolting yet another piece of kit onto the boat, but I'll try my best to avoid that sort of naturally evolved look :)
 
It's worth noting that for a solar panel or two and maybe the odd antenna, there is no need for massive structures made from monster tubing. Looking at the pics in the post #15 link, the ones at the bottom, with a single "goalpost" would easily support a couple of 100w panels. Tube size would only need to be 1" x 1.6mm.

If fitting radar, liferafts or davit fixings it obviously needs to be stronger. I have a 64w panel (old so same size as a modern 100w panel) mounted on a 1" vertical pole, clamped to the pullpit rail, been there since 2001 when the boat was in the Med.
 
Top