G12
Member
RADAR 24/7 in guard zone alarm mode.
That's useful and many of us use guard zones but doesn't comply with the IRPCS.
RADAR 24/7 in guard zone alarm mode.
That's useful and many of us use guard zones but doesn't comply with the IRPCS.
I am sure the staff of the MAIB will find that interview 'interesting.'It does if you place a stuffed doll in the cockpit area for any passing insurance investigators.
I'm interested where you got that information fromAIS, Surely! Everyone out there has it these days and those big ships are computer controlled aren’t they? In fact aren't commercial ships legally obliged to have AIS transponders? They'll automatically avoid you. I suppose the range might be limited by the height of your mast but it will be much better than your eyes or ears. I pick up ships miles away on mine.
I'm sure he was merely being flippant..I'm interested where you got that information from
Flippancy is not easy in a forum.I'm sure he was merely being flippant; (just as you were, when you implied that MAIB staff are stern interrogators in shiny jackboots, looking to apportion blame...)
Flippancy is not easy in a forum.
In a previous life I investigated serious safety incidents and I have the utmost respect for all the safety boards. We all do a difficult job when people realist their professional reputation and income is on the line!
How does "I am sure the staff of the MAIB will find that interview 'interesting.' " in response to @TNLI placing a stuffed doll in the cockpit to absolve the skipper of responsibility turn into 'MAIB staff are stern interrogators in shiny jackboots,'. My meaning, clearly not well communicated, was that MAIB staff might find getting any information from the 'witness' impossible.
Having had a long chat with somebody who was interviewed by MIAB staff after a fatal accident I know they conduct interviews in exactly the same way I did, no stern interrogation in shiny jackboots with thumbscrews or threats of waterboarding, more a brew and a conversation to understand what and why an incident happened. It takes tact, a huge amount of experience and intelligence.
I am a regular solo sailor and extremely interested in unmanned vessels (where remote sensors do a lot of the, but not all, OOW duties), their navigation and compliance with COLREGS, and former member of the Royal Institute of Navigation.
I'm insured through them s/h as far as Gibraltar.
RADAR, as it's far more reliable than a crew.How do single handers comply with the colregs?
%age of value is a meaningless figure and is not used by insurers to determine premiums for leisure boats (although it is used in commercial shipping for premiums of the cargo element of the policy)What percentage premium are they charging for what used to be an agreed hull value policy ??
I'm with Bluefin (Bishop Skinner) and they are okay with single handed sailing provided I have proper self steering which I do (windvane and Autohelm) and at an increased excess overnight. This is noted on the policy. This has been okay for the Azores and multiple cross Channel trips etc. However, when I first asked years ago they said no to single handed night sailing and stipulated that i needed two extra crew to cross Biscay. Once I had some longer trips under my belt they agreed to single handed cover. The operation seemed more personal back then and I was dealing with people who knew what they were talking about. Not sure its the same now.The other thread about sailing single handed, reminded me to ask you lot: how do you managed to get ensured?
I ask, because when I contacted my insurance company, about extending the cover to the Azores, I was told that would do it, but only if I could guarantee 2 additional crew.
Now, this is only hypothetical, for now. But how does one manage to get insurance cover for single-hand sailing? Is it possible to get one-off cover for single journeys/restricted time?
I’ve read through all my documentation from pants and there is no mention of crew requirement. I’m leaving it at that.