chrishscorp
Well-known member
I think this is an important issue that should be discussed everywhere. It can affect international visitors from the States.
+1
I think this is an important issue that should be discussed everywhere. It can affect international visitors from the States.
I think this is an important issue that should be discussed everywhere. It can affect international visitors from the States.
...
Legally yachts arriving from the States can have red fuel as international law states that yachts arriving from outside the EU are exempt. ( According to the RYA) provided any fuel purchased thereafter is in accord with the country visited. So that would infer yachts arriving from the Channel Islands as well.
As I have said before, and been accused of not liking foreigners! The Belgian Govt took a long time to form, typical proportional representation mess! Then they have to have Ministers. I suspect that it is either an inexperienced Minister OR more likely (and there has been some stories coming out) one with an agenda, that coupled with some bolshie officials with an agenda gets us where we are today. The only answer is, considering that the stories say any trace rather than a definitive amount, dont visit Belgium! Let market forces hit the stupid fools! I would also say that, given the number of Spanish boats around the Algarve, flying a Belgian flag and the port of Antwerp as their port of registration, Belgium needs to get its house in order and stop Spanish residents using its registration as a flag of convenience to avoid Spanish "luxury" tax!The stupidity of the Belgian action is that it will do them no good apart from a few fines the revenue of which will be lost in administration. Of what advantage to them is it if another country allows the use of red diesel either duty paid or not in their flagged sailing vessels? They gain no revenue, it has to be a taxation issue of a sovereign nation.
I believe that this is more an informal international convention than international law. Countries do not normally seek to enforce local taxation laws and other fuel related regulations on vessels passing through their waters, but I don't think there is anything in accepted international law which says that they have to.
I was only quoting what the RYA told me & they say that it is an international law & a such , theoretically trumps EU law !!!!!!!
I wish
I think, strictly speaking, you mean the Belgian interpretation of EU rules.OK - the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea is international law and states that no coastal state should interfere with foreign flagged vessels on "Innocent Passage" through their waters. "Innocent Passage" effectively is defined as peaceful passage with no stops other than for emergencies. If a foreign flagged boat docks other than in an emergency, they can't claim Innocent Passage and become liable for the laws of the coastal state.
So if you sail from Holland to France through Belgian waters, you should be immune to interference from the Belgian authorities, but if you stop anywhere in Belgium, then they have the power to enforce EU rules relating to fuel being carried.
I think, strictly speaking, you mean the Belgian interpretation of EU rules.
I was only quoting what the RYA told me & they say that it is an international law & a such , theoretically trumps EU law !!!!!!!
I wish
Law of the land you are currently in trumps any other law.
Especially if it is being administered by a bloke wearing a gun!
I have emailed the HQ asking them to clarify their position in the light of the economic impact that that might have. If they reply I will keep you posted.
The stupidity of the Belgian action is that it will do them no good apart from a few fines the revenue of which will be lost in administration. Of what advantage to them is it if another country allows the use of red diesel either duty paid or not in their flagged sailing vessels? They gain no revenue, it has to be a taxation issue of a sovereign nation.
As I have said before, and been accused of not liking foreigners! The Belgian Govt took a long time to form, typical proportional representation mess! Then they have to have Ministers. I suspect that it is either an inexperienced Minister OR more likely (and there has been some stories coming out) one with an agenda, that coupled with some bolshie officials with an agenda gets us where we are today. The only answer is, considering that the stories say any trace rather than a definitive amount, dont visit Belgium! Let market forces hit the stupid fools! I would also say that, given the number of Spanish boats around the Algarve, flying a Belgian flag and the port of Antwerp as their port of registration, Belgium needs to get its house in order and stop Spanish residents using its registration as a flag of convenience to avoid Spanish "luxury" tax!
Stu
OK - the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea is international law and states that no coastal state should interfere with foreign flagged vessels on "Innocent Passage" through their waters. "Innocent Passage" effectively is defined as peaceful passage with no stops other than for emergencies. If a foreign flagged boat docks other than in an emergency, they can't claim Innocent Passage and become liable for the laws of the coastal state.
So if you sail from Holland to France through Belgian waters, you should be immune to interference from the Belgian authorities, but if you stop anywhere in Belgium, then they have the power to enforce EU rules relating to fuel being carried.
I quite agree.
Why is it then a problem when Belgium does indeed exercise its sovereignty.![]()
As pointed out there is international law that they are party too that means they should not be stopping boats transiting their waters. In addition it is accepted by convention that countries do not interfere with the taxation regimes of other countries. One has to ask the question, why are they doing it? to what purpose.
My answer to the problem would be to refrain from visiting the country by land or sea even if they change their stance, they have displayed a dog in the manger vindictive attitude and yes I did sail from the East Coast for a few years and I found Belgium to be uninteresting and not really worth visiting Holland was far more pleasurable.
As pointed out there is international law that they are party too that means they should not be stopping boats transiting their waters. In addition it is accepted by convention that countries do not interfere with the taxation regimes of other countries.
One has to ask the question, why are they doing it? to what purpose.
My answer to the problem would be to refrain from visiting the country by land or sea even if they change their stance, they have displayed a dog in the manger vindictive attitude and yes I did sail from the East Coast for a few years and I found Belgium to be uninteresting and not really worth visiting Holland was far more pleasurable.