rotrax
Well-Known Member
My interpretation is that the original Pan Pan call, being an all station broadcast, might be excluded, the subsequent transmissions between the vessel in distress and those directly assisting them would not be. So disclosing the way this call was resolved and the identity of those attending would be in breach of the legislation.
I only raised the point because I'm not a particular fan of threads that seek to question someones actions when the OP isn't in full possession of the facts. It's speculating as someone else's expense and that's not attractive.
Correct-I was not in possesion of all the facts, only those heard on channel 16.
IIRC I said that I mused what I would have done in a similar situation.
If that is construed as critisism, or speculating at someones expense, so be it.
Also, the boat calling for assistance, and the boat attending were not directly identified in the OP. I agree it would not have been difficult to find the identities.
The poster who hove to in the wallet and refitted a clevis pin furnished the type of " I did it this way " practical advice I hoped might be forthcoming.
I certainly did not expect a bollocking............................