Question.

[byron]

Re: Not quite Byron.

<font color=blue>Nope! Not nitpicking, the point is a valid one. I will nit pick tho' and observe in which case the name (initials) of the club is substituted for the PoR.

<hr width=100% size=1>http://www.alexander-advertising.co.uk

 

[Forbsie]

Re: Not quite Byron.

I noticed that and wondered what would happen with the Royal Corinthian which has one club in Burnham on Crouch and a branch in Cowes. Would all boats be regarded as being registered in Burnham or what?

<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.arweb.co.uk/argallery/forbsie?&page=1>My Project</A>

 

[burgundyben]

Re: Not quite Byron.

I never thought this fred would go this far, as Iam not a member of the Royal Tesco (Royal southern but know locally as royal tesco as thats the only place they go) its not an issue, Playtime II Southampton it is.

<hr width=100% size=1>"Who was he?"

 

[byron]

Re: Not quite Byron.

<font color=blue>Bit of a dodgy one to comment on that one because of past history. In the old days pre the kerfuflle, Cowes could issue warrants but membership there did not give membership of Burnham whereas membership of Burnham did give membership of Cowes. It was all very complex and I haven't got a clue what the situation is now.

<hr width=100% size=1>http://www.alexander-advertising.co.uk