Csfisher
Active Member
I know this is a question that is asked over and over again; and usually sparks a lot of heated debate.
BLUF (Bottom line up front): If you had in the region of £100k to spend on a boat; would you suggest buying a new(er) production boat or an older well maintained sturdier boat?
Background:
- I have a lot of sailing experience, and decided it's time I stop crewing and chartering and get my own boat.
- I live on the Solent, and work full time therefore intend to keep the boat fairly local and therefore most sailing will be coastal and not blue water. If I do go further afield, I'll pick and choose my crossings to avoid serious weather where possible.
- I want something with a reasonable turn of speed; able to passage make at 6kts ideally, but anything above that would be a nice to have.
- Comfortable interior - overnighting for weekends, or staying onboard for multi-week trips for one couple with the occasional landlubber couple in the second cabin.
- relatively minimal maintenance. I have no issue with regular required maintenance, and have no issue using some of my budget to refit a boat if required but ideally don't want to be using all my 'sailing' time working on a boat that needs heaps of work.
- Maximum size would be around 40ft (due to the size of the mooring I have in mind). Ideal would be 36-38ft.
- Easy to sail as a couple or occasionally solo (mostly this just means all lines leading to the cockpit).
My thoughts so far:
New(er): (circa 2-5 year old Bavaria / Hanse / Ben / Jen etc.)
- Biggest downside I can see is the depreciation. Now, I am not buying a boat as an investment, but I am aware that if circumstances change and I end up having to sell early the big loss will sting.
- I have of course heard the horror stories over the quality of newer boats. I haven't spent much time on boats newer than circa 2007 so don't have a lot of first hand experience. Are boats made in the last 3-4 years that bad? From what I've read, some of the production cruisers are now using bett(er) construction methods than they were 10 years ago?
+ Newer I am presuming would be easier to part-finance & insure?
+ The newer designs seem to be much faster, and seem to generally sail very well (in their intended environment - coastal waters).
+ The newer designs interior (if perhaps a little ikea ish) are generally very spacious. Now I know they often have less storage, but that is a compromise I'd be willing to consider.
+ If the boat is 3-4 years old, generally I would expect the sails, spray hood, engine, and most other parts to have a reasonable amount of life left in them so wouldn't have to worry about that immediately.
+ Generally aesthetically newer boats are 'nicer'. They look good and the interiors are lighter and roomier. My concern is, do they stay this way for long?
Older: (circa 1990-1995 Hallberg Rassy 36 etc.)
+ The depreciation curve has mostly flattened. Keep up with maintenance and I don't see myself loosing a great deal of money on the right boat (HR for example).
+ Sturdier, capable of more than anything I'd probably want to do. No keel falling off horror stories for example...
+ I do like the CC layout of some of these boats, the aft cabin would suit me very well, although I do know that there is a trade off with sailing capability.
+ With any luck, will have had a lot of systems upgraded / replaced recently
- May be due a bit ticket item such as sails or heads or worse - TEAK DECKS...
+ I actually really like the styling of the HR, very classical lines
- Typically much slower especially for their sizes?
- Often smaller inside, less beam, shorter waterline length etc.
- General wear and tear of old items including deck hardware etc. will presumably require more regular maintenance
- Greater risk of big issues such as osmosis etc.
The third wildcard option: circa 2005 production sailboat and pocket the change to cover costs of repairs / upgrades or to charter abroad occasionally?
-/+ would this be a happy medium of the two? Or am I just going to get the disadvantages of both?
BLUF (Bottom line up front): If you had in the region of £100k to spend on a boat; would you suggest buying a new(er) production boat or an older well maintained sturdier boat?
Background:
- I have a lot of sailing experience, and decided it's time I stop crewing and chartering and get my own boat.
- I live on the Solent, and work full time therefore intend to keep the boat fairly local and therefore most sailing will be coastal and not blue water. If I do go further afield, I'll pick and choose my crossings to avoid serious weather where possible.
- I want something with a reasonable turn of speed; able to passage make at 6kts ideally, but anything above that would be a nice to have.
- Comfortable interior - overnighting for weekends, or staying onboard for multi-week trips for one couple with the occasional landlubber couple in the second cabin.
- relatively minimal maintenance. I have no issue with regular required maintenance, and have no issue using some of my budget to refit a boat if required but ideally don't want to be using all my 'sailing' time working on a boat that needs heaps of work.
- Maximum size would be around 40ft (due to the size of the mooring I have in mind). Ideal would be 36-38ft.
- Easy to sail as a couple or occasionally solo (mostly this just means all lines leading to the cockpit).
My thoughts so far:
New(er): (circa 2-5 year old Bavaria / Hanse / Ben / Jen etc.)
- Biggest downside I can see is the depreciation. Now, I am not buying a boat as an investment, but I am aware that if circumstances change and I end up having to sell early the big loss will sting.
- I have of course heard the horror stories over the quality of newer boats. I haven't spent much time on boats newer than circa 2007 so don't have a lot of first hand experience. Are boats made in the last 3-4 years that bad? From what I've read, some of the production cruisers are now using bett(er) construction methods than they were 10 years ago?
+ Newer I am presuming would be easier to part-finance & insure?
+ The newer designs seem to be much faster, and seem to generally sail very well (in their intended environment - coastal waters).
+ The newer designs interior (if perhaps a little ikea ish) are generally very spacious. Now I know they often have less storage, but that is a compromise I'd be willing to consider.
+ If the boat is 3-4 years old, generally I would expect the sails, spray hood, engine, and most other parts to have a reasonable amount of life left in them so wouldn't have to worry about that immediately.
+ Generally aesthetically newer boats are 'nicer'. They look good and the interiors are lighter and roomier. My concern is, do they stay this way for long?
Older: (circa 1990-1995 Hallberg Rassy 36 etc.)
+ The depreciation curve has mostly flattened. Keep up with maintenance and I don't see myself loosing a great deal of money on the right boat (HR for example).
+ Sturdier, capable of more than anything I'd probably want to do. No keel falling off horror stories for example...
+ I do like the CC layout of some of these boats, the aft cabin would suit me very well, although I do know that there is a trade off with sailing capability.
+ With any luck, will have had a lot of systems upgraded / replaced recently
- May be due a bit ticket item such as sails or heads or worse - TEAK DECKS...
+ I actually really like the styling of the HR, very classical lines
- Typically much slower especially for their sizes?
- Often smaller inside, less beam, shorter waterline length etc.
- General wear and tear of old items including deck hardware etc. will presumably require more regular maintenance
- Greater risk of big issues such as osmosis etc.
The third wildcard option: circa 2005 production sailboat and pocket the change to cover costs of repairs / upgrades or to charter abroad occasionally?
-/+ would this be a happy medium of the two? Or am I just going to get the disadvantages of both?