cmedsailor
Well-known member
I hope you are correct. The CA info is 'and gazetted as A 256 of 28th November.'
Oh, s....t. You are correct. It is indeed in the gazette. (page 4413)
I hope you are correct. The CA info is 'and gazetted as A 256 of 28th November.'
First, the tax was enacted as Article 13 of Law 4211/2013 on 26 November 2013. It was gazetted as reference A 256 on 28th November. We were aware this was probably the case about a week ago, but didn't post it until we found proof on www.et.gr yesterday, the 12th December. http://www.cruising.org.uk/news/greektax was then updated.http://www.et.gr/
I suppose this is the place to keep an eye. I have ckecked but didn't see anything yet. If I am missing something (hopefully not) or you see it coming let us know.
Thanks
So I'm not that far in the back then!
I find it very strange that the Athenian Yachts manager and Melody's accountant who are both well versed Greeks in the sailing environment do agree that the law has not been passed and stamped. The last law even got into the legislation hand books that the Port Police have in their offices and it just did not happen. I have a South African friend who contacted his maritime lawyer in Athens over a week ago and nothing has been made law was the reply. At this moment I'm going to be an optimist . . . Time to sit back with a glass in hand and chill.
No - but near enough to be hit with a piece of chalk...... Reminds me of our french teacher - rear gunner of a lancaster - deadly accurate with the chalk - and the board duster
Unacceptable abusive behaviour from your teacher. Do you need counselling? Can I handle your compensation claim?
I don't understand why you are so confused. It's so simple. A law is proposed. People is able to see the proposal. That (the proposal) is what we were talking about some weeks ago.
Then, the law ia presented for vote in the parliamen where minor or less minor changes can be proposed.
If the law gets the vote it will inevitably become a law of the state WHEN the average citizen is notified. Then and only then the law is effective (with some exceptions I think, but then, I 'm not a lawyer and in any case it is clearly stated on the voted and signed draft).
OTOH, before the law gets printed, a new law can pass altering the first one in which case a voted law never becomes effective.
P.S. Oh s..t it is really gazetted. I saw it with my very eyes...
Your un-tutored reading is correct, and this is the key "wake-up" call which the British, German, French and Swedish Cruising Associations are using to open negotiations with the Ministry of Marine and Aegean, the body responsible for putting this law forward, and then implementing it.My untutored reading is that for Greece to impose any general restriction on this, including a financial one, would be contrary to their treaty obligations. Such passages would be routine if sailing, for instance, up the Turkish west coast where dipping into Greek waters would be natural.
Equally, this is Article 18 from the relevant UN convention:
1. [Innocent] Passage means navigation through the territorial sea for the purpose of:
(a) traversing that sea without entering internal waters or calling at a roadstead or port facility outside internal waters; or
(b) proceeding to or from internal waters or a call at such roadstead or port facility.
2. [Innocent] Passage shall be continuous and expeditious. However, passage includes stopping and anchoring, but only in so far as the same are incidental to ordinary navigation or are rendered necessary by force majeure or distress or for the purpose of rendering assistance to persons, ships or aircraft in danger or distress.
Would this mean that in a passage from say, Marmaris to the Dardanelles, it would be legitimate to anchor in Greek waters (other than at a port or roadstead) in the normal course of a passage without losing innocent passage status? I'm asking not what view the Greek authorities might take of this, which I think we can guess, but what maritime law has to say about it.
Your un-tutored reading is correct, and this is the key "wake-up" call which the British, German, French and Swedish Cruising Associations are using to open negotiations with the Ministry of Marine and Aegean, the body responsible for putting this law forward, and then implementing it.
Quite simply, as the translations are worded, they breach international law.
Writing now from the British Cruising Association point of view. It's probable that the drafters just failed to consider this point, and will phrase a suitable amendment. Luckily, this gives us a very good lever to start negotiations on most of the other issues which have been raised on this thread, on YBW fora and on the fora run by the various Cruising Associations.
Hopefully they can be persuaded that it's better to collect a small tax from a lot of boats that will then stay in Greece than it is to impose a large tax that many will avoid by leaving.
Your un-tutored reading is correct...
Thanks, Jim. Good to know some of my marbles still work. It's maybe not the Cruising Association's strategy to be bolshie, but some individual cruisers might be interested in carrying a Greek version of the relevant UN convention (which I presume can be downloaded from their site). I'm just about bloody-minded enough to ask that any Greek tax collector who boards me signs a copy as understood. Anyone else for a class action suit?
More generally, next year we plan on sailing up to Istanbul and the Black Sea. The idea of not being able stop off at one of the zilllions of Greek islands without stumping up an utterly disproportionate €1400 along the way is bizarre. I'm a citizen of the sodding EU (of which, on the whole, I approve, so that sort of prejudice doesn't come into it). What happened to freedom of movement? I don't recall any caveat that it's only for the rich.
Mac - so far most people have been politely saying that this tax is fair in many respects and that we should contribute our fair share. Some of course have not been so polite. I personally have been concerned at how to pay it and keep sailing and how to mitigate the costs. I am beginning now to lean to the not so polite approach - whilst I am very fond of the Greeks, I just loath petty officialdom and their cockups - of which this is becoming more and more of an example. As a member of the EU, they should be capable of setting out laws which don't contravene international laws that have already been agreed to for starters!
If as stated on the Cruising forum, that in order to pay this tax one will have to register with the Tax office - that will be the ultimate in bad dreams - I know how long it took just to get a DEKPA and port exit stamp (€0.88 I was made to go back for this) in Corfu - only to find having gone through all the hoops that there were no DEKPAS to be issued!!!!
What a mess.
Your un-tutored reading is correct, and this is the key "wake-up" call which the British, German, French and Swedish Cruising Associations are using to open negotiations with the Ministry of Marine and Aegean, the body responsible for putting this law forward, and then implementing it.
Quite simply, as the translations are worded, they breach international law.
Writing now from the British Cruising Association point of view. It's probable that the drafters just failed to consider this point, and will phrase a suitable amendment. Luckily, this gives us a very good lever to start negotiations on most of the other issues which have been raised on this thread, on YBW fora and on the fora run by the various Cruising Associations.