It's a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

Jools_of_Top_Cat

New member
Joined
16 Dec 2002
Messages
1,585
Visit site
It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

This was discussed recently on PBO and in my opinion never cleared up or even clarified. It has reared its ugly head again in the non compliance extortion racket, AKA Penalties for not carrying a VHF ships license.

How do you call another ship when you do not know their MMSI number. Mike Martin (MM) has declared that you could put out an all stations or even an urgency alert on DSC. He has in the past declared that ch16 should not be used to voice call.

So a couple of things here,

1. If you do put out a DSC call how will the vessel know you are trying to attract Her attention. It could result in 200 vessels all trying to respond. More likely though it will result in 2000 miffed skippers travelling to the VHF to shut the damn thing up!

2. From what I understand, an urgency message can only be cancelled be a shore station, such as the CG. This means every ship in the area is either going to wait for a response by HMCG or come steaming over to 'help'. The intention of calling the other vessel will be lost, at best he will totally ignore your calls.

3. A quick call on 16 at low power such as,

Sailing yacht off Brighton Pier this is xxx, you appear to be experiencing problems, do you require assistance. OVER.

Xxx this is yyy, yes we were but it is back under control now, thank you, OUT.


Or of course move to a working channel once contact was made. The only people disturbed, possibly the CG, a few people close enough to hear a 1W broadcast on 16.

Bang this out on the DSC and people on shore start panicking and readying big orange boats and waving bits of paper in the CG centre. Hundreds, if not thousands of vessels have to silence their radios, people in the Solent or Thames on a clear day wondering what all the fuss was. Half the French fleet wondering what the damn ‘Roast Beefs’ are up to now!

4. I was motoring into Porthmadog one morning and a vessel I had been alongside in Barmouth had dropped his anchor in the Porthmadog channel. His impellor had shredded. I did not know his MMSI and if he had one, probably would not have. I knew the name of the vessel and called him as we passed, on learning his peril, was able to offer a tow. This all took place in about 15 seconds on Ch 16, all low power and very few people were disturbed. Problem solved. In MM scenario the whole of Tremadog bay would be disturbed!

5. If we all start using a DSC all stations to try to contact another vessel we see and require communication with it will be worse than the radio checks at weekends or the same vessels calling their mates every hour. I can at least lower the volume so this does not drive me nuts. But you cannot really lower the alarm can you.

6. If it all goes this way I might dust off my K flag and have it ready to hoist, bit tricky at night though.

MM, are you really sure this is the way forward, seems like a backward step to me.

***Disclaimer*** I do not chit chat on the radio, so far this year I have called harbour masters and once the CG to relay some safety information. But occasionally I need to contact another vessel.


<hr width=100% size=1>Julian

<A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.topcatsail.co.uk>
1.gif
</A>
 

MarkV

New member
Joined
8 Dec 2003
Messages
147
Visit site
Re: It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

Agree with all of the above. A CG leaflet I read recently said call on CH16, "and if not reply" try CH13, which is the non DSC bridge to bridge channel.

By the way what does a K flag mean?

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

beachbum

New member
Joined
7 May 2004
Messages
175
Location
Lancs.
Visit site
DSC IS a backward step!

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>

MM, are you really sure this is the way forward, seems like a backward step to me.

<hr></blockquote>

Course it is!
The sole purpose of DSC is to save commercial shipping money.

<hr width=100% size=1><font size=1>Nobody is perfect.
I am nobody.
Therefore I am perfect.</font size=1> /forums/images/icons/wink.gif
 
Re: It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

This has been well and truly answered before and I think everyone is well aware of that.

Reading your questions and the background it all seems to be about contacting vessels to offer assistance before they've even requested any. Sorry but I don't understand!

Mike

<hr width=100% size=1>Team Executive,
Maritime & Aeronautical Team, Ofcom
 

MarkV

New member
Joined
8 Dec 2003
Messages
147
Visit site
Re: It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

I don't think it has been clearly answered, all you seem to say is "why would you want to?" and dispite the number of different examples people have come up with not explained how.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

alex_rogers

New member
Joined
30 Aug 2002
Messages
230
Location
Lymington
Visit site
Re: It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

CH13 is the GMDSS 'bridge to bridge' channel. GMDSS requires commercial vessels to monitor channel 13 when in confined areas.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

alldownwind

New member
Joined
10 Aug 2004
Messages
1,290
Location
Medway
Visit site
Re: It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

Basil D'Oliviera in ST this month says that the mandatory watch on Ch16 will almost certainly now continue beyond 2005, because of the lack of take-up of DSC by leisure craft.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Talbot

Active member
Joined
23 Aug 2003
Messages
13,610
Location
Brighton, UK
Visit site
Re: It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

Having read all the ******** about DSC on mumerous threads, I have no intention of changing to a system that seems to be designed to make people turn it of cause they are fed up with the alarms. Call me a dinosaur if you want, but I cannot see how this has materially improved the safety of seafarers

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

powerskipper

Well-known member
Joined
18 Sep 2003
Messages
12,287
Location
Dorset/ Hampshire. south coast
www.facebook.com
everyone listen!

Please all be carefully, these threads are going to make people worried about using the radio, It is there for safety, and to aid boats
Jools between solitaire and myself will answer your questions shortly.I have to go out but will be back later.

<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://powerskipper.mysite.freeserve.com/>http://powerskipper.mysite.freeserve.com/</A>
Julie
 

bigmart

New member
Joined
14 Jan 2002
Messages
1,953
Location
Hampshire
Visit site
Re: It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

Surely, in this perfect world where we all live, soon all boats will be equipped with AIS systems so you will be able to get their DSC number from their plot on your Radar/Chart Plotter/AIS box. You will be able to call them directly& you will have no need to annoy anyone else with your transmission.

I just wonder how I'm going to generate all the power I will need to run all this junk!

Martin

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

MarkJohnson

New member
Joined
2 May 2003
Messages
73
Location
Swansea
Visit site
Re: It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

I bought a DSC radio as I had to replace the old one.

I have two DSC courses as I keep forgetting how to use it.

Needless to say, it has not been used in DSC mode yet, nor has it received any DSC messages or alerts.

We live in the backwaters of Swansea. May the revolution stay away........



<hr width=100% size=1>
 

tome

New member
Joined
28 Mar 2002
Messages
8,201
Location
kprick
www.google.co.uk
Re: everyone listen!

Julie

Those of us who have used DSC for a while have some genuine concerns which are not down to ignorance, so your expert guidance ain't going to help us here.

A recurring thread is the inability to alter the alarm volume. Neither Mike Martin nor Jon Brooks think this is a problem. Both MM & JB ride noisy RIBS and neither appreciate the point we're making. They represent RA/Ofcom & a major supplier, so if they won't listen then what hope is there?

If users don't like DSC it will not fly and I for one wish I hadn't wasted my money on the upgrade. Sorry if this isn't what you want to hear.

Tom

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

powerskipper

Well-known member
Joined
18 Sep 2003
Messages
12,287
Location
Dorset/ Hampshire. south coast
www.facebook.com
Re: everyone listen!

I have heard this from many, many people, and yes sorry I can not sort that, But it is something that needs to be looked at by all those involved in the design and manufacture and guideline writers [for want of a better word]. It mite be worth all who find this to write a letter to there manufacturers saying this and encourage others to do so to. The RYA I think will be aware of this problem now.

<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://powerskipper.mysite.freeserve.com/>http://powerskipper.mysite.freeserve.com/</A>
Julie
 

ubuysa

New member
Joined
4 Jan 2004
Messages
348
Location
Mediterranean
Visit site
Re: It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>

How do you call another ship when you do not know their MMSI number. Mike Martin (MM) has declared that you could put out an all stations or even an urgency alert on DSC. He has in the past declared that ch16 should not be used to voice call.

<hr></blockquote>

So (following MM's advice on another thread) I read the Offcom Ship Radio Information booklet. In the Summary Of The Rules it states:

Minimise the amount of time spent establishing contact on Channel 16 (one
minute maximum) and then immediately switch to another inter-ship channel – and
keep discussions on these other channels to the business of the vessels concerned.


It does not say that CH16 may no longer be used for establishing contact.

Tony C.

<hr width=100% size=1>Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.......
 

Birdseye

Well-known member
Joined
9 Mar 2003
Messages
28,520
Location
s e wales
Visit site
Re: It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

Most of my VHF contact is with other yotties who do not have DSC and are still monitoring 16 anyway. I expect them to continue to do so whatever MM and his minions say since no one is going to use an all ships DSC call to chat about which pub to meet at. Anyway, in our 160 member club I only know of 4 other DSC sets.

DSC will be useful in getting through to that Phillipino tramp steamer who never monitors 16 anyway. When the all ships rings his alarm he might respond. Might. And you might understand him. But if its anything like the 3rd world radio ops contacting our local pilots, forget it.

My third group of calls are to the CG. The last time I used DSC to them, I got a call back on 16 saying "would the vessel calling on DSC please identify themselves" Either their computer was down, or they couldnt be bothered using it.

So on balance I feel there are advantages to DSC even outside a Myaday / Pan call. But the uncontrollable loud alarms negate these - I sail with the VHF turned off these days. Or with my biking earplugs in (great for windy days!) So it doesnt really matter whether you call me on 16, or DSC

<hr width=100% size=1>this post is a personal opinion, and you should not base your actions on it.
 

powerskipper

Well-known member
Joined
18 Sep 2003
Messages
12,287
Location
Dorset/ Hampshire. south coast
www.facebook.com
Re: It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

Jools here goes.
Point 1
DSC can be broad cast to one number, like a text message on your phone giving your MMSI number, your set when you acknowledge it will turn to the channel they impute/programed there set to talk on[6,8,72,77 normally] then commence normal voice procedures[chat] This is how it takes the first call up off 16.But you need there MMSI number to do this, I have suggested to some students that a boat card be made up, with, boat name, tell number and MMSI number on.
or to all sets with in ranger 30-40 n miles on 25watt or 5 n miles on 1 watt or a handheld.
This is also the way the coast guard transmit there security/ weather forecasts messages.


2. You can not DIGITALLY acknowledge an urgency call, but if you press the button that acknowledges calls this should turn the alarm off on your set, if the urgency it retransmits after 4 min,[not heard by coastguards] the alarm will go off again.

3. DO IT.
4 Good call.
5. If it is directed to one vessel this should not happen, see 1.
6. Your choice.

I hope this has helped a bit.

Julie.


<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://powerskipper.mysite.freeserve.com/>http://powerskipper.mysite.freeserve.com/</A>
Julie
 

Solitaire

Active member
Joined
25 Jun 2001
Messages
6,239
Location
Southampton
Visit site
Re: It\'s a DSC thing - still not cleared up. LONG

Jools, Julie and Boatone have answered a lot of your issues. I would just point out that in no cirucnstances should anybody use the "urgency" call to try and establish contact with another vessel for "a chat". This is tantamount to issuing a Pan Pan call and as such would be almost as bad as issuing a false Mayday call.

If people looked at their sets more and used low power, the airwaves would not be as congested. I doubt if many do check the power setting when using the set.

Also it might help if people used the MMSI number section in the Bio. We could then have at least a member directory here.

DSC is a paging system, it is not a system in itself! Carry on using Ch16 to raise people on and then get to a working channel as soon as possible. Remeber that it is the initiating station that determines the working channel.

<hr width=100% size=1>Boating is <A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.powerboattraininguk.co.uk>Serious Fun</A>
 

Other threads that may be of interest

Top