webcraft
Well-Known Member
. . . for a marina that will only see use basicaly May to September the economics just do not work out.
Brian Swinbanks of Tobermory Harbour Authority would profundly disagree with you, and as he has experience of running precisely this type of development I would humbly suggest that his opinion might be more relevant than yours.
From the minutes of an OBM meeting in September 2010:
The Tobermory Experience – Brian Swinbanks, Tobermory Harbour Association.
Brian: don’t be disappointed by web forum comments, where supporters list their names and detractors are anonymous; words do not build infrastructure. This is an opportunity to rebuild the project; re-assess support of funders; partnership and community enterprise are the way forward, profit not required. Infrastructure at sea is required in Oban, esp. in community ownership.
Tobermory now into phase 6; currently investigating breakwater for shelter from NE wind.
Tob started small, when funding was a little easier. In 2004 = 2985 boat nights, 2009 = 7314 boat nights; x 4 people per boat = 30,000 people ashore, @ £30 per head = minimum spend £1M;
supports infrastructure way above its small population size of 1000 inc. 17 restaurants; 100% pontoon occupancy during height of summer; still looking to expand income streams; and supporting all kinds of local support services.
Brian felt this was a no-brainer, THA with 40 berths and 26 swinging moorings make a profit.
(I don't know where Brian got his figures of £30 per head spend ashore, but I assume it is from one of the studies done by the various tourist organisations. However, this figure refers to benefit of the local economy. The pontoon development is profitable in its own right).
Morvern, if you are so sure it is NOT going to be profitable then can you perhaps give us your own breakdown of the figures involved and let us know where they were derived from?
- W
Last edited: