How fast do BIG ships go?

Chris771

New member
Joined
15 Feb 2002
Messages
272
Location
Ormskirk UK, Cabinda, Gabon or Paphos, Cyprus
Visit site
I'll Throw in my two penneth, though I'm a week after everyone else (having just got back from offshore in Africa where I did not have Internet).

My last few trips in the MN, now over 20 years ago were in the Panamax sized (maximum size for the Panama Canal 986' long by 120' beam) OCL Bay Class Container ships of 68,000 tonnes (the big green ones for Solent boaters). As far as I recall they were fitted with a pair of 60,000shp triple stage steam turbines which originally gave a service speed of 28.5 kts at a consumption of 600 tonnes of bunker oil per day. The fastest I ever recall going was a flat out race from Bremerhaven to Maas Center Buoy for a Europoort Berth with an Atlantic Containers ship, we averaged just over 31 kts. With the first oil crisis we were slowed down to a service speed of firstly 26 kts @ 480 tonnes per day and then even more to 24.5 kts at 400 tpd. To keep the precious new toys from Japan from being damaged the ships were fitted with gyro controlled active fin stabilisers which were retracted into the hull for berthing. The ships never rolled more than +/- 2 degrees, though the motion was twitchy in a rough sea.

Ultimately,after I left, the 5 ships were taken back to Blohm & Voss in Hamburg where the accommodation was cut off and the boilers and turbines removed and replaced by a pair of the largest diesel engines that Sulzer had ever produced at that time.

Apparently, according to a friend, they went from being completely vibration free steam turbine vessels to just ordinary rattly diesels with a maximum service speed of just 24 kts, the point of the exercise being to get the consumption down to 200 tpd.

They were the most luxurious ships I ever sailed in. I had a beautiful 3 room suite (dayroom, bedroom & bathroom) with a leather Parker Knoll suite and a pair of 4ft high picture windows.

In the tropics the stabilisers kept the swimming pool from sloshing about. I asked someone still at sea about them a couple of months ago, as I had not seen one in So'ton during the last couple of Boat Shows, and he said that they had needed to be scrapped as Japanese shippers will not trust their precious cargoes in ships over 20 years old, irrespective of condition.

Seems a shame such beautiful ships have gone. Recall a few anxious moments going round the bend into Southampton Water off Cowes. We needed to do 14-16 knots to get round sharply enough to stay in the channel and a lot of small boaters did not realise that in the early days, we had nowhere else to go and more than once had a small boat scraping down the side with gratuitous abuse coming over the vhf; cannot understand why same boaters never listened to the safety broadcast we used to give requesting a wide berth as we approached.

Supertankers, on the other hand, never needed speed and used to do about 14 to 16 kts, normally on a single screw, which explains a lot of strandings. A lot of them lacked backup steering gear control systems and also lacked emergency generating power.

Bulkers and general cargo ships mainly travelled at about 16 kts, though there were a few fast cargo vessels (pre container days) which did about 21 knots.

My first cargo/passenger ship the "Glenearn" was a Malta convoy veteran which did 18 kts on twin screws and used to run the gauntlet unescorted because of her speed and ability to outrun U Boats. That was another sad day when we left her in Kaohsiung, Taiwan to be made into razor blades & Daiwhatsu's.


Chris

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

BrendanS

Well-known member
Joined
11 Jun 2002
Messages
64,521
Location
Tesla in Space
Visit site
Gem of a post. Thank you. It would be great to see more like this.

The idea of a nearly 1000' boat doing 31+ knts is incredible...and no planing hull. I knew some big naval ships could attain such speeds, but not container ships.

Puts paid to the idea that displacement hulls have to be slow. Is this an extension of hull speed? (longer the hull, greater the theoretical speed) I'm a complete ignoramus in this area.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Chris771

New member
Joined
15 Feb 2002
Messages
272
Location
Ormskirk UK, Cabinda, Gabon or Paphos, Cyprus
Visit site
Hi Brendan,

AFAIK the 1.4 x sqrt of the waterline length (approx) still applies which would give a theoretical speed of about 44 kts. We need a Naval Architect or one of our Master Mariners to answer that one, I am a mere Electronic Engineer.

I do know that the submerged bulb on the bow does make a very significant difference to the flow of water around the hull, really decreases the wall of water that conventional bows used to push ahead of them.

Sounds like a question for Byron.

A little humour on the subject of speed. Once when descending the paralell Miraflores locks into the Pacific the Master of a PandO passenger vessel (half our size) in the other locks called us on vhf called and informed our Master "Terribly sorry old chap, fast passenger vessel, need to get away promptly you know, have requested first out of locks so you don't hold us up" "Not a problem" politely replied our skipper whilst giving us on the bridge "Who the f**k does he think he is" promptly phoning the engineroom and advising the Chief Engineer of the need to have the boilers on full boost as soon as we dropped the pilot. News spread throughout the ship in minutes.

Pilots duly dropped, we shadowed the *** Princess up to 26 kts then the skipper gave a double ring full ahead and we passed her at 31 kts, far too close with, to a man, 28 white bums mooning along the starboard prom deck rail for the benefit of the Master, crew and passengers of the Princess.

The apopleptic rantings of the pasenger vessel master on vhf were duly ignored, as we steamed off into the sunset and an official reprimand was received from head office following a complaint from PandO. ...........Happy days!

Took the Master and Chief Engineer the remainder of the passage across the Pacific to Tokyo to gently "nurture" the speed and consumption figures to lose the 80 or so extra tonnes consumed in the exercise. Never recall being asked to move over again after that though.


Chris




<hr width=100% size=1>
 

BrendanS

Well-known member
Joined
11 Jun 2002
Messages
64,521
Location
Tesla in Space
Visit site
That is a truely wonderful story! I'll bet the crew performed above average for days afterwards. The sort of thing that builds real team spirit....'sod the official reprimand, the skipper did a beaut, and those idiots in head office....blah, blah,.....and did you see their faces when we went past them with our backsides out....' type of thing?

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

BrendanS

Well-known member
Joined
11 Jun 2002
Messages
64,521
Location
Tesla in Space
Visit site
Ah, but that's different.

The skippers all know my boat by sight, and are used to me belting past at 44knts, and the number of Japanese tourists who have me and my nether regions on video is legion!

They'd be rather more shocked to be overtaken by a container ship with a multitude of backsides on display

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

tr7v8

Active member
Joined
30 Nov 2001
Messages
1,270
Location
Kent
Visit site
Hull speed occurs at a speed/length ratio of 1.34 and it's V/SQRT L which by my calcs makes 42Knots. This is from the John Teale book.

<hr width=100% size=1>Jim

Draco 2500
 
Top