Oceanis
New member
Did they call the lifeboats? I heard they merely informed the CG that they were without steering.
OK, given the level of experience and qualifications of the crew, would you have put to sea in those circumstances?
Did they call the lifeboats? I heard they merely informed the CG that they were without steering.
I don't think so. Making one mistake does not, and should not, get a school's RYA approval revoked.
This is about a series of incidents pointing to a sloppy approach to safety. To my mind the debate on this forum is getting bogged down in the last incident when the others are equally, if not more, telling.
OK, given the level of experience and qualifications of the crew, would you have put to sea in those circumstances?
I don't think so. Making one mistake does not, and should not, get a school's RYA approval revoked.
This is about a series of incidents pointing to a sloppy approach to safety. To my mind the debate on this forum is getting bogged down in the last incident when the others are equally, if not more, telling.
Indeed, and taking a novice crew out into that sort of weather makes it very likely that it will.
What the hell has that got to do with:
a) Whether or not the Skipper delegated "responsiblity for the go/no go decision to a group of CCs and DSs".
b) Whether or not the people on the boat called the lifeboats.
???????????
...but it wasn't clear to him they were novices because in the eyes of the RYA 2 were skippers and 3 were competent.
Perhaps both CC and DS should be renamed "Novice Ticket" so there are no future misunderstandings about the value of these rather expensive tickets.
Also he didn't 'take them out'. They went of their own free will. He had no power to make them go.
Wasn't Groundhog Day yesterday and is there an ignore button?
...but it wasn't clear to him they were novices because in the eyes of the RYA 2 were skippers and 3 were competent.
Perhaps both CC and DS should be renamed "Novice Ticket" so there are no future misunderstandings about the value of these rather expensive tickets.
Also he didn't 'take them out'. They went of their own free will. He had no power to make them go.
Final word before I go and watch the rugby.......I agree, novice ticket is excatly what it is. It's the equivalent of getting your first swimming certificate "swimming one length of the pool!"
...but it wasn't clear to him they were novices because in the eyes of the RYA 2 were skippers and 3 were competent.
Perhaps both CC and DS should be renamed "Novice Ticket" so there are no future misunderstandings about the value of these rather expensive tickets.
Also he didn't 'take them out'. They went of their own free will. He had no power to make them go.
I notice you haven't attempted to address what I actually said.
So if you can't think of any reason why I'm wrong perhaps you have to consider the possibility that I'm right?
a leisure RYA certificate tells anyone who is interested that you have aquired a measure of training TO A MINIMUM LEVEL
it would be pointless to do so for the millionth time
...but it wasn't clear to him they were novices because in the eyes of the RYA 2 were skippers and 3 were competent.
Perhaps both CC and DS should be renamed "Novice Ticket" so there are no future misunderstandings about the value of these rather expensive tickets.
Also he didn't 'take them out'. They went of their own free will. He had no power to make them go.
I rather get the impression that you're the only poster on here who does insist on misunderstanding these "tickets", which are not without value but must be considered in context. Would you claim that passing your driving test makes you competent to take a rally car round an off road stage on ice without more training and experience? Or a novice skier do a black run? Or a pilot with a basic PPL fly a Spitfire in bad weather? In theory he's qualified to (after compulsory extra training for tailwheel, variable pitch prop and retracting undercarriage!) in reality he would very likely be dead.
As for saying they went of their own free will, (a) they were under psychological pressure, they trusted his position as professional instructor for whose services they were paying, it wasn't just like a sail with another club member, it would have been like arguing with the boss and (b) they weren't competent to judge at their level of experience. They were entitled to rely on his judgement. You're right of course he had no power to force them, but it would have taken guts to be the first to say no. He should have been briefing them "this is going to be demanding, do you understand what you may be facing?" His tweets suggest (speculation I know) that his attitude would have been rather different from that.
A few years ago I was due to crew on a cross channel race and the skipper withdrew the night before because of the current weather (F6/7, rising) and worsening forecast. In my inexperience (recent DS) I tried to persuade him to go and I tried to find another berth. A few boats did go, met the F9/10 that was forecast, suffered lots of damage and one had MoBs (recovered). Now with more experience, I'm sure he was right, but if he had gone, I would have gone with him. If it happened again now, I don't think I'd go even if he did!
That's because I said I wouldn't.
No you haven't in ur previos posts. I've read them. You haven't addressed anything I've said.