Great Circle routes

MADRIGAL

Active member
Joined
12 Jan 2019
Messages
332
Visit site
Flat Earthers are too irrational for it to be worth trying. Eratosthenes' experiment provided ample evidence of the spherical nature of the earth; everything since then, up to and including eye witness accounts, simply confirms what he first demonstrated.
And of course, if you look at the horizon from a small boat at sea, you can see the curvature. Flat earthers must live in land-locked regions.
 

capnsensible

Well-known member
Joined
15 Mar 2007
Messages
43,483
Location
Atlantic
Visit site
When you ask people on small boats how far away they think the horizon is, I've generally found that the answer averages around 20nm. It surprises them to discover that with a 2m height of eye above sea level, it's a tad under 3....
 

zoidberg

Well-known member
Joined
12 Nov 2016
Messages
5,834
Visit site
"During walkout to the 'plane, the navigator asked his young pilot 'Do you want to fly the Great Circle Route today or shall we just go straight there'..."

:oops:
 

AntarcticPilot

Well-known member
Joined
4 May 2007
Messages
10,099
Location
Cambridge, UK
www.cooperandyau.co.uk
On YouTube there is a claim that there is a Great Circle route from England to New Zealand via the Drake Passage. Anyone know if it is true?
Quite likely, but you might bump into one of the South Shetland Islands - @JumbleDuck posted one on here, but it certainly came close to the SSI, and the scale was too large to be certain. Note that the stretching string trick won't work on that one - it will try and do the Great Circle the other way, as it's shorter. @JumbleDuck was posting to show the longest possible Great Circle sea passage.
 

AntarcticPilot

Well-known member
Joined
4 May 2007
Messages
10,099
Location
Cambridge, UK
www.cooperandyau.co.uk
I have the impression Great Circle routes are a notion spilled from plane/merchant maritime world which is most often useless for a sailboat: it there any one ocean route where one might want to follow a GC route instead of a weather route? Where the increase in distance by not following a GC route is not more than offset by the advantage of better wind direction/speed? Even in very high latitudes, say Japan to Alaska, or the northern option in the Ostar, the GC route will always be subordinate to the existence of correct weather. In temperate latitudes, the big high pressure systems in the middle of the oceans will make half of the crossings deviate a lot from GC.
Carib to Azores for example, the difference between GC and loxodromy is a few tens of miles over 2000+, a weather route will usually be near that; whereas no one in his right mind would try and follow the GC going Canaries to Caribbean.
The Southern hemisphere has a lot less land so maybe sailboats GC routes make more sense there?
View attachment 171095
As you say, Great Circle Routes are of little interest to yachts; making good use of global wind patterns and ocean currents is more important. The Great Circle route to the Caribbean, for example, would give you a headwind and be against the North Atlantic Drift and Gulf Stream.
 

AntarcticPilot

Well-known member
Joined
4 May 2007
Messages
10,099
Location
Cambridge, UK
www.cooperandyau.co.uk
Quite likely, but you might bump into one of the South Shetland Islands - @JumbleDuck posted one on here, but it certainly came close to the SSI, and the scale was too large to be certain. Note that the stretching string trick won't work on that one - it will try and do the Great Circle the other way, as it's shorter. @JumbleDuck was posting to show the longest possible Great Circle sea passage.
This is the England to NZ one, I think: Amazing map proving you can sail from Britain to New Zealand in a straight line ?

It certainly isn't feasible, and may intersect the Amundsen Coast of Antarctica! I'd also be worried about the Falkland Islands and Pete I Øy. I note that they are using a pretty low-resolution world map of dubious accuracy in the Antarctic, too. And, of course, a large part of it would mean sailing through solid pack ice!
 

Daydream believer

Well-known member
Joined
6 Oct 2012
Messages
19,485
Location
Southminster, essex
Visit site
I think I read in "The Lounge" that the Flat Earth Society has announced that its membership is expanding all around the globe.
It is a horizontal circle around the edge you wally- Honestly-- Some people :rolleyes: :cry:🤣
We all know the earth is round. But round like a saucer, it is not rectangular like a football pitch.
Did you do nothing at school-- other than pick your nose & flick the boggies at the blackboard?:p:eek:
 

Daydream believer

Well-known member
Joined
6 Oct 2012
Messages
19,485
Location
Southminster, essex
Visit site
When you ask people on small boats how far away they think the horizon is, I've generally found that the answer averages around 20nm. It surprises them to discover that with a 2m height of eye above sea level, it's a tad under 3....
That is because of all the CO2 that Franksingleton is creating. It bends the line of sight so it makes the earth seem banana shaped.
Banana shaped earth
 

wonkywinch

Well-known member
Joined
30 Jul 2018
Messages
1,158
Location
Hamble, UK
Visit site
And of course, if you look at the horizon from a small boat at sea, you can see the curvature. Flat earthers must live in land-locked regions.
I don't think you can. It's an illusion where you see a radius of only 3-4 miles so the impression is that it's curved.

I spent many hours staring out the front at 40,000 feet and you can't see curvature at that height. Concorde was different and I was fortunate enough to witness that a couple of times.

To put a plane's altitude in perspective, 40,000 feet is 7.5 miles. Here's a pic of a globe covering the route mentioned above. Picture how far 7.5 miles is on that globe. It's tiny, so a flight is really very close to the surface. The atmosphere is not much thicker so it's like a very thin membrane over the surface of the earth. A scary thought.20240123_094337.jpg
 

Jonny A

Active member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
235
Location
Poole
Visit site
I have the impression Great Circle routes are a notion spilled from plane/merchant maritime world which is most often useless for a sailboat: it there any one ocean route where one might want to follow a GC route instead of a weather route? Where the increase in distance by not following a GC route is not more than offset by the advantage of better wind direction/speed? Even in very high latitudes, say Japan to Alaska, or the northern option in the Ostar, the GC route will always be subordinate to the existence of correct weather. In temperate latitudes, the big high pressure systems in the middle of the oceans will make half of the crossings deviate a lot from GC.
Carib to Azores for example, the difference between GC and loxodromy is a few tens of miles over 2000+, a weather route will usually be near that; whereas no one in his right mind would try and follow the GC going Canaries to Caribbean.
The Southern hemisphere has a lot less land so maybe sailboats GC routes make more sense there?
View attachment 171095
Going Canaries - Caribbean I was forced by southerly (!) winds to start heading almost due west several days earlier than I wanted... at that point the great circle route did still matter.
 

pyrojames

Well-known member
Joined
9 Aug 2002
Messages
2,943
Location
Cambridge
transat2013.blogspot.co.uk
This is the England to NZ one, I think: Amazing map proving you can sail from Britain to New Zealand in a straight line ?

It certainly isn't feasible, and may intersect the Amundsen Coast of Antarctica! I'd also be worried about the Falkland Islands and Pete I Øy. I note that they are using a pretty low-resolution world map of dubious accuracy in the Antarctic, too. And, of course, a large part of it would mean sailing through solid pack ice!
You can check possible GC routes on google maps by using the "measure distance" feature. I am currently hitting eastern Russia in my attempts!
 
Top