jimi
Well-Known Member
What is more interesting is why none of the big builders make anything smaller than 32 foot.
cos if they did they would be small builders ... boom boom
I'll get me coat!
What is more interesting is why none of the big builders make anything smaller than 32 foot.
What is more interesting is why none of the big builders make anything smaller than 32 foot.
cos if they did they would be small builders ... boom boom
I'll get me coat!
No, it's more about what you earn and how much of it you have left after you have paid all your outgoings.
Well in a way that's always going to be true. But I don't think it's true that "most people cannot afford a boat". It just depends what you mean by 'boat'!
For example, a kid I know worked all summer and at age 14 bought himself a Wayfarer. Keeps it on a free running mooring and his annual running costs are basically nil. I give him a tow with the car whenever his parents can't. That little boat gets more use than any of the yachts in the harbour.
It would be a very sad world indeed if a hard working kid couldn't afford to run a boat.
Well in a way that's always going to be true. But I don't think it's true that "most people cannot afford a boat". It just depends what you mean by 'boat'!
For example, a kid I know worked all summer and at age 14 bought himself a Wayfarer. Keeps it on a free running mooring and his annual running costs are basically nil. I give him a tow with the car whenever his parents can't. That little boat gets more use than any of the yachts in the harbour.
It would be a very sad world indeed if a hard working kid couldn't afford to run a boat.
Totally agree hence my original post. Marketing not journalism.In view of the above I do not believe that the YM editorial team, excellent people that they all are, are entirely responsible for the wording in question. Rather, it seems to me, it's the creation of some marketing type who, in a rare moment of carelessness, was let out of his cage.
I don't think anyone has mentioned that one of the drivers why some people end up buying a boat in the mid 30's feet as their first boat is that it is the type of boat on which they learned to sail (e.g following the RYA syllabus).
Someone wanting to get into sailing (or back into sailing after an extended break as in my case) but without access to a mate with a boat, is very tempted to pay for a berth on a weekend skippered charter or a Comp Crew RYA course. The vast majority of these will be AWB's in the 35-40 foot range. As they get more experienced so they end up chartering the same type of boat.
Eventually, they decide to buy and what type of boat are they immediately attracted towards? A similar boat to the one they did their Day Skipper on and have been chartering for the last x years.
b. Entry-level. Clearly this means that one needs such a boat to enter the sport - doesn't it? Again, replies show clearly that this is not necessarily so. Not that I would have anything against someone who, after gaining a little knowledge and experience, maybe on a course or otherwise, buys such a boat and sails off happily. But it's not the only way!
I took it to mean entry level to their range, rather than the sport. ie entry level Oyster would be the 46, not the ideal first boat for a beginer.
That's what they told me when I bought mine, assuring me that I would have it for less than 3 years and trade in fo rlarger.
Wrong. It's my last boat, not my starter boat.
We were in the very fortunate position of being able to afford it, just, at the time.
7 years, no sign of trading it in.![]()