EASLOOP
New member
Update:
Further to my recent post it now appears that water intake during take-up has diminished by almost 70%. All being well, and I don't want to tempt providence, she should be dry within the next few days.
Now comes the paranoia bit: She is sitting in a mud berth so I cannot see under her. She has a v. large lump of iron as the balast keel. This might sound dumb, but what would the boat act like when afloat if the iron lump had fallen off? I presume should would be exceedingly unstable to the point of turning over (she is fully rigged with a two spreader mast, of about 40 feet or so). I would anticipate seeing a lot of water coming up through the keel bolts if the keel had gone. She has been ashore for 10 years and so I had become accustomed to seeing the keel - now she is in the water ???
Facts: East anglian, mahogony on oak, laid teak deck. 27' 10" LOA, 8' beam, 4' 6" draught.
Look forward to your replies.
John
<hr width=100% size=1>
Further to my recent post it now appears that water intake during take-up has diminished by almost 70%. All being well, and I don't want to tempt providence, she should be dry within the next few days.
Now comes the paranoia bit: She is sitting in a mud berth so I cannot see under her. She has a v. large lump of iron as the balast keel. This might sound dumb, but what would the boat act like when afloat if the iron lump had fallen off? I presume should would be exceedingly unstable to the point of turning over (she is fully rigged with a two spreader mast, of about 40 feet or so). I would anticipate seeing a lot of water coming up through the keel bolts if the keel had gone. She has been ashore for 10 years and so I had become accustomed to seeing the keel - now she is in the water ???
Facts: East anglian, mahogony on oak, laid teak deck. 27' 10" LOA, 8' beam, 4' 6" draught.
Look forward to your replies.
John
<hr width=100% size=1>