martynwhiteley
Active member
Whilst 'running-in' my new baby Merc 1.7, and getting used to revs required to get on and off the plane, it got me thinking about what's best to minimise engine wear, and as a spin off, get the best economy (not that the 1.7 could ever be accused of being thirsty - last week I completed 25 hours, 242 miles on the GPS, moving average 11.1, and it only used 41 gallons of diesel!)
For much of its running in time, I was in the 2000-3000 rpm region, but its not planing at these revs and needs to get up to about 3600-3800 to lift up. Once up, I can throttle back to about 3300 and it will continue to plane (in calm waters).
My question is that, would it be better for the engine to be running at say 3800 as a 'cruising speed', than 2800 where it would be in semi-displacement mode? (The engine will rev to 4200 with the current 15" prop, about right, since the max is 4400, and the manual states WOT 4000-4400).
Or would it just be a case of better economy, but the higher revs would mean more engine wear? (it does run hotter at the higher revs).
<hr width=100% size=1><font color=blue> Real boaters do it on the Humber </font color=blue>
For much of its running in time, I was in the 2000-3000 rpm region, but its not planing at these revs and needs to get up to about 3600-3800 to lift up. Once up, I can throttle back to about 3300 and it will continue to plane (in calm waters).
My question is that, would it be better for the engine to be running at say 3800 as a 'cruising speed', than 2800 where it would be in semi-displacement mode? (The engine will rev to 4200 with the current 15" prop, about right, since the max is 4400, and the manual states WOT 4000-4400).
Or would it just be a case of better economy, but the higher revs would mean more engine wear? (it does run hotter at the higher revs).
<hr width=100% size=1><font color=blue> Real boaters do it on the Humber </font color=blue>