Sharky34
Well-known member
Meaningless.If you don't know you would be well advised to find out. Ignorance is only a little better than stupidity.
Meaningless.If you don't know you would be well advised to find out. Ignorance is only a little better than stupidity.
Same questions to Warsash and Hamble School of Yachting currently awaiting a reply but I suspect it'll be the same.
I don't think anyone has yet noted that there will be an element of 'pent-up demand' for courses and the like once restrictions are lifted.
Good for you, now you are well prepared for when the opportunity returns. Things appear to be getting a little better here with restrictions easing a bit. Hopefully it might not be to long.I've just spent the past two weeks (on and off) working through my RYA Day Skipper theory course with a local company (Splash Sea School) that offer the course completely online. Fantastic way to learn - especially during these troubling times. I've come away with my RYA Day Skipper Theory Qualification but now desperate to get the practical booked. It sounds like it could be some time before that happens which would be a great shame.
Not all the deaths are being associated with the virus, even if that was the cause.Sharky the 177,000 confirmed cases though are only those where test has been done. Until very recently few have been eligible for tests so the otherwise healthy person with a nasty cough will sit at home and wait it out but not be diagnosed. So whilst your numerator is correct, the denominator is much too small as it ignores all those with mild cases who haven't gone for tests. The UK results though reflect the fact that until recently the only people that were guaranteed to get a test were those in hospital where the doctors suspected Covid so look really bad just due to an biassed sample being used
Some estimates originally put the death rate at 1 per thousand cases or 0.1 % which looks optimistic - A Los Angeles study suggested 0.18, helsink 0.19% Boston 0.31% , Gangelt in Germany 0.37% , Santa Clara 0.12% etc. We'll probably end up a figure somewhere in that range but of course a lot depends on the ability of the NHS to cope - if it can;t death rates will climb.
Or even the next few months. Research from BUPA and the LSE showed that the median life expectancy for someone entering a care home was 462 days, so a significant proportion of those who have died in care would have died over the next few months anyway. Which is not to dismiss the sadness of their deaths, of course.What will be interesting is if we see fewer deaths in the next five to ten years...
Thank you Uricanejock for your response. It was nice to hear someone respond back with something positive rather than lots of the negative rhetoric that seems to have plagued this thread. It's great to be able to learn some sort of theory with a view to being able to do something positive once this is all over. Might even progress to the Yachtmaster course whilst lockdown is still happening!!Good for you, now you are well prepared for when the opportunity returns. Things appear to be getting a little better here with restrictions easing a bit. Hopefully it might not be to long.
Not all the deaths are being associated with the virus, even if that was the cause.
An expert on R4 suggested that the true figure, was the number of 'excess' deaths when compared to the 'norm'.
As can be seen in the below example, the percentage is high.
- "The provisional number of deaths registered in England and Wales in the week ending 3 April 2020 (Week 14) was 16,387; this represents an increase of 5,246 deaths registered compared with the previous week (Week 13) and 6,082 more than the five-year average.
- Of the deaths registered in Week 14, 3,475 mentioned “novel coronavirus (COVID-19)”, which was 21.2% of all deaths; this compares with 539 (4.8% of all deaths) in Week 13."
Balanced by deaths, that are down to covid, but not actually put onto death certificate, particularly when this can now be done over the phone.But not all those deaths will be of someone who died WITH coronoavirus. For example, oncology doctors have warned of additional deaths through missed cancer appointments, The number of heart and stroke patients attending hospital has plummeted - many of those not attending may well die. So i agree that they have been caused indirectly BY coronoavirus - this is one of the categories that Professor Vallins has mentioned repeatedly - those who miss out on a treatment. In this case though it's not coronavirus per se, that has killed them, but a disproportionate response to the fear of it, rather than a balancing of the risks of dieing from coronavirus than dieing from a stroke, heart attack, cancer etc.
I was wondering what the median age of the forum is? Well up there I presume. Though most of us are still active and not in care homes.
[/QUOTE/
Balanced by deaths, that are down to covid, but not actually put onto death certificate, particularly when this can now be done over the phone.
Experts have stated that excess deaths give a truer picture.
EU says Britain is NOT seeing a downward trend in coronavirus outbreak
This is a great news piece from Sky News. Help understand how the stats can be used to suit the agenda.