Dear Mr Council (nb)

tcm

...
Joined
11 Jan 2002
Messages
23,958
Location
Caribbean at the moment
Visit site
I thought i would update you with the ongoing story of me buying a house in order to knock it down and build a nicer house in your borough, but then (once i had bought it) your planning dept saying that the existing house was too nice.

Personally, and also in the view of everyone else in the road, i think the existing house is a bit ghastly, especiallly since the judgement of niceness was made in June lastyear when all the honeysuckle and such was tumbling over the house. Since then i have cut it all down, and reason for the wisteria etc is quite clear - the house is actualy horrid.

Nonetheless, i have launched a planning appeal. I belive that this may also be in the process of being refused too, but am not sure.

Meanwhile, and more recently, from another department of the council came a leter which advised that there would now be a full charge for council tax, even for empty houses. This seem a bit rich, seeing as how it is another gang in the same council that are preventing me from revdevelopment. Also, an empty house can't be full of people using council services now can it?

Anyway, I noted on the council tax letter that there were exemptions, one of them being that if the house was not a legal dwelling then no council tax applies. A legal dwelling needs a sink and toilet. So, last thursday i bought a wrecking bar from B Q £6.75 plus saftey goggles smashed the window (i can't find the keys to the house any more not having been there for a year) and set about destroying all the sinks and loos. This would have the side benefit of making the house unattractive to squatters too.

There was a little bit of water coming out of the taps, presumably from a full hot water tank. All the gas and electric is off, and i belive that the water had also been cut off too. However, 30 minutes later, having smashed all the sinks and bogs, it became clear that the water was not turned off, and the bedrooms began to fill up with water. I couldn't find the stop cock, and was a bit worried about how the water would affect the electrics which are turned off but you never know, so i got in the car and drove off.

Two days later my wife passed by the house and there are large damp patches all around the ouside of the house. I will be going over to check the situation, and would imagine that the ceilings may have fallen in. I will also be advising the water board, who had said that they would be cutting off the water, but evidently hadn't. I wouldn't have thought that the house could completely fil with water as there's a cat flap, but I'm not sure.

All this is a result of your planning dept that slapped down any development, and your coucil tax department that invented a sily new rule, designed to encourage anyone with an empty house to smash in the loos and bogs rather than stump up £2k per year for nothing at all. The very unfortunate result is that the house (which is crap, but your lot thought was nice) will soon fall over and/or slither down the hill. Eventually, you might relent and let me redevelop. But the kids like living elsewhere. So, this means that when we eventually do put a house up it will be a bit quick and dirty, rather than carefully carefully dream house. You could have talked to me about the original plans, couldn'tcha, hm?

The current situation is therefore that you get no council tax, and the place is a right mess. I don't mind too much, as i don't live in the area - it's turning into a bit of a derelict slum area, see. So, if you DO eventualy give me planning permission, i might not do any developement unless you give me a large grant.


<hr width=100% size=1>
 

jimi

Well-known member
Joined
19 Dec 2001
Messages
28,660
Location
St Neots
Visit site
Oh that's a shame! Sorry about yer hoose, TCM, ye should have bought one in Wilts. Local planning office, despite every single neighbour objecting allowed a planning application for an extremely ugly and intrusive extension. The good news for you is that you as the applicant can appeal whereas, once granted, planning permission cannot be appealed against except on the grounds of abuse of process.

<hr width=100% size=1>I Have The Body Of A God... Buddha
 

zefender

Active member
Joined
9 Jul 2001
Messages
1,741
Location
quacious
Visit site
Yes but if you seal up the cat flap and then remove the roof, you could use the dwelling as a marina development. Just stick a boat in it, draw pictures of boaty scenes around the garden, add a few old anchors etc and charge a premium for being easily commutable from London. Many people wouldn't actually notice the difference or regret minor non-seagoing issues. Suggest you make sure the cat is outside before completing phase two of course.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

jimi

Well-known member
Joined
19 Dec 2001
Messages
28,660
Location
St Neots
Visit site
Disagree Zeffie, I'd ensure that a lorry load of fish was in the house immed prior to the flood!

<hr width=100% size=1>I Have The Body Of A God... Buddha
 

sailbadthesinner

New member
Joined
3 May 2002
Messages
3,398
Location
Midlands
Visit site
Re: solution

i would invite the local pikeys (if not you may have a to trawl around and find some) round to retarmac the drive
then refuse to pay saying they can knock the house down for all you care before you'll pay up
hey presto

<hr width=100% size=1>Beer. Source of and answer to all life's problems.
 

poter

Active member
Joined
4 Feb 2002
Messages
2,127
Location
Still going south currently in Corsica for winter
www.fairhead.com
TCM

If you ever get round to building your dream house, I know a really good builder -
AAAAAAA Builder & Sons, who did a great job on the roof of my house in London,
The roof did'nt leak but was in need of repair, as a few tiles had come loose.
Now we have an internal water fall feature which I did'nt order but was obviously part of the scheme, as the builder has now B***ed off for 6 months.

As we got something extra for no increase in the original estimate & knowing your fondness for 'Value for money' & general love of the red tape brigade, (they only work for cash) They would seem to be ideal for your development.

Let no know & I will see if I can get in touch with them. Although they are very very busy, as they don't have time to respond to any of my calls, night or day.

Regards.....


poter.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

sailbadthesinner

New member
Joined
3 May 2002
Messages
3,398
Location
Midlands
Visit site
Re: aah but

on completion and probable great success of said marina an extension would then be in order, which would no doubt be blocked by the planners. you would you see be disturbing a unique habitat, it being the only sanctuary for pollock in the area. tcm would then be obliged to maintain it and probably put up hides so beardy weirdys can visit the nature sanctuary

<hr width=100% size=1>Beer. Source of and answer to all life's problems.
 

poter

Active member
Joined
4 Feb 2002
Messages
2,127
Location
Still going south currently in Corsica for winter
www.fairhead.com
Re: aah but

Mmmm I can go with that.. But reality bite's hence....
there has been a problem with dreging the Exe, as the tree huggers say that it will disrupt the wading birds...... Doh! why is dreging an estury so that the river can be used, going to upset a few Birds?

So currently I can only get to my mooring about 2 to 3 hours either side of HW.

Mumble mumble grrrr!

poter

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Fill

New member
Joined
17 Sep 2003
Messages
249
Visit site
Re: AAAAAAAAA builders

Leave a message on their answering machine that you need to sort out tax affairs and completion of your job and since they deal only in cash you need to refer their ref nos to the Inland Revenue & VAT inspectors. Unless you hear from them in 2 days you'll just have to deal direct with the VAT office.


might concentrate a few minds.

<hr width=100% size=1>Fill
 

Twister_Ken

Well-known member
Joined
31 May 2001
Messages
27,584
Location
'ang on a mo, I'll just take some bearings
Visit site
Dear Mr TCM,

As Enforcement Officer of the London Borough of Gorblimey and Avarice, it has been drawn to my attention that the property you own, situate at Leopard Avenue, SE13.574 is in a dangerous condition. As no permissions exist for its demolotion, you are hereby obliged to a) make the property safe and b) return it to a habitable condition with work commencing within the next 24 hours, and a completion date of no later than April 1st, 2004.

You will see from the text in the enclosed enforcement order that contingent upon your failure to comply with this instruction, the Council will take immediate possession of the property and carry out such works as required to make it sound , secure and desirable. After an open tender process, such work will be carried out by my brother-in-law's very reputable and very expensive building company, McClaymore, Parahandy and Associates, with costs (labour, materials, architect's fees, legal fees and sundry out-of-pocket expenses) being charged to you subject only to a 33.333% uplift to cover the council's admiinstration costs, staff gymnasium and Christmas party budget. Should you fail to pay these charges the council will recover its costs by placing the property on the rental market and after an open tender process it will be rented by our Civic Affairs Department and used to house visiting dignitaries from our twinned towns of Upper Manhattan, Palm Beach, Aspen Colorado and Hollywood.

I remain, sir, your humble servant,


Mr John Prescott-Blunkett, jnr.

<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.writeforweb.com/twister1>Let's Twist Again</A>
 

david_e

Active member
Joined
1 Oct 2001
Messages
2,188
www.touraine.blogspot.com
Would they refuse an application to rebuild the house the same as it is now? Presume not if they think it is loverly, then minor changes could be applied for. No doubt you have been down this route and me - no planning expert.

My Bruv is developing a a 40k sq ft office block and the council said 'want it to be 60k sq ft and reduce the number of car spaces so everyone will get the tram' which in turn will support our traffic policy.

Seems they all have their quirks, just a case of finding em.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 
Top