Americas Cup 37 about to commence

flaming

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2004
Messages
15,787
Visit site
I am not talking about going that far but on the current width courses when they are doing 40+ knots it's less than 40 seconds of sailing time from when they round the gate to them having to tack / gybe at the boundary.
I think with the gates you already give the following boat the option to split at both ends of the course. When the breeze is up like it has been the last couple of days the downwind legs are already not far off 1 gybe legs. Make it much wider and you would not get any interaction downwind from top to bottom.
 

Buck Turgidson

Well-known member
Joined
10 Apr 2012
Messages
3,349
Location
Zürich
Visit site
Stayed on the course and won the starts. It’s not rocket science. The excitement comes from wondering who will fall off the foils or break something. I don’t think there has been a lead change after leg 2 has there?
 

bedouin

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
32,577
Visit site
In today's conditions INEOS has a small advantage in boat speed and that is enough for them to win both.

The next couple of sailing days are currently predicted much lighter and that make the races a bit of a lottery
 

Chiara’s slave

Well-known member
Joined
14 Apr 2022
Messages
7,456
Location
Western Solent
Visit site
In today's conditions INEOS has a small advantage in boat speed and that is enough for them to win both.

The next couple of sailing days are currently predicted much lighter and that make the races a bit of a lottery
INEOS’s foils, contrary to what has been widely thought, are not optimised for the higher end windspeeds, they said yesterday. And in the very light stuff they seemed to have an advantage too. The light to medium airs, it’s all about threading your way though the shifts, and a modicum of luck. In the next 3 races, we should get lucky once, which is all that’s needed.
 

flaming

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2004
Messages
15,787
Visit site
INEOS’s foils, contrary to what has been widely thought, are not optimised for the higher end windspeeds, they said yesterday.
Yes, they did say that. For which audience did they say that I wonder.....

The details of what they do to mode the boats for wind and wave conditions are fascinating. If you look closely you can see that they run with very different cant angles on the foils for example. And the way they use different amounts of camber in the bottom of the main is also very interesting.
 

Airscrew

Active member
Joined
1 Feb 2015
Messages
249
Location
Hamble River and Nidri - Ionian
Visit site
In many ways it's incredible that 2 teams working completely independently have produced two such incredibly evenly match boats.

The way this is playing out at the moment, whichever team wins is going to deserve it, but the other team is going to be going away with a real "what if" feeling. Both have made errors that cost them races.

I didn't think I'd enjoy watching the racing this cup all that much, but I'm completely hooked.
Yep. Completely hooked (pun intended). Close and competitive, and in terms of balance and control, racing right on the edge. Fascinating.
 

Airscrew

Active member
Joined
1 Feb 2015
Messages
249
Location
Hamble River and Nidri - Ionian
Visit site
Perhaps someone here, maybe @flaming , could explain or offer a view on 'rudder immersion' (did they mean cavitation?), which has been in the commentaries from yesterday. The yachts appear quite agile / unstable in yaw, suggesting large momentary loads on the rudder.

And also thoughts please on the view(s) (eg from @mozzysails) that the INEOS hull seemed less likely to plug or stick in the taller wave conditions yesterday.
 

flaming

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2004
Messages
15,787
Visit site
Perhaps someone here, maybe @flaming , could explain or offer a view on 'rudder immersion' (did they mean cavitation?), which has been in the commentaries from yesterday. The yachts appear quite agile / unstable in yaw, suggesting large momentary loads on the rudder.

And also thoughts please on the view(s) (eg from @mozzysails) that the INEOS hull seemed less likely to plug or stick in the taller wave conditions yesterday.
I think imersion is literally how far down in the water it is. Trade off is if it's deep there is extra drag, but if it's shallow there's less of it to actually steer the boat and more of a risk of the elevator breaking the surface in a wave, which would be all kinds of bad.

Mozzy's point was that Ineos's hull shape allowed them to get away with touches that cost LR huge amounts of distance.
 

Airscrew

Active member
Joined
1 Feb 2015
Messages
249
Location
Hamble River and Nidri - Ionian
Visit site
I think imersion is literally how far down in the water it is. Trade off is if it's deep there is extra drag, but if it's shallow there's less of it to actually steer the boat and more of a risk of the elevator breaking the surface in a wave, which would be all kinds of bad.

Mozzy's point was that Ineos's hull shape allowed them to get away with touches that cost LR huge amounts of distance.
And is that because INEOS has more buoyancy forward, from the wider looking 'bustle'?? To bounce rather than stick??
 

flaming

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2004
Messages
15,787
Visit site
I think so. But Mozzy was also making the point that dropping the bow in is often accompanied by a loss of rudder grip, and that the longer and deeper "keel/bustle" then helps resist turning whilst they get the flow on the rudder back and full control back. If that was always the design intention it's brilliant.

And should delight the souls of devout long keeler fans everywhere....
 

bedouin

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
32,577
Visit site
The winds are light but I suspect they will manage to get at least one race start (after all all they need is 5 minutes >6knts) whether it is a fair race or even finishes is another matter.
 
Top