I think AIS is worth it, especially if you have software which tells you whether that ferry that looks like its coming straight for you is going to go behind or in front. You can get going for <£200 if you already have a chart plotter
Marpa is quite expensive, and any ships that you wouldnt be able to avoid should a close quarters situation develop should have AIS.
I'm using the NASA unit with the E80 and it drops out regularly (just when you need it). The output drive level of the NASA AIS doesn't meet NMEA specs so it's fine with a PC but not much use elsewhere
Aah I am using it on a PC. I'm guessing the output is probably TIA/EIA232 rather than 422 signal levels. However the NMEA standard recommends 422, it does not require it. Raymarine stuff is great though.
Not quite all Radar are MARPA capable and those that are should be equipped with a gyro compass before they can give accurate CPA information.
Having used MARPA on several occasions I think it is absolutely fabulous but I accept that it is expensive and not affordable by all (myself included). AIS is also great but flawed. There are too many vessels out there who don't, or won't turn it on or don't or won't have it fitted. Some of these are the most difficult to avoid - fishing boats, high speed motor boats, grey-funnel cruisers etc. also in some crowded waters the screen is so full of information I fear things might get missed.
Having said that, for the price, NASAs AIS radar is hard to ignore.
The NASA site claims it's RS232, but then it also claims that the output is NMEA 2000 which it isn't. I'll check next time I'm down but I suspect that the output is 3.3V TTL which doesn't even meet RS232. Fine with a PC which is very tolerant of levels and baud rates
The NMEA 0183 standard (which I have in front of me) states that a talker "shall meet, at a minimum, the requirements of EIA-422-A" so def not a recommendation
Tome - you sound very knowlegeable about all this rs232 and 422 and levels is this another skill that goes along with the sewing.
There are lots of experts on this forum and i wonder who to believe with all this complicated talk, is the NASA no good, can i not use it as radar, it says it is, can i link it to my compass to get a heading?
Can the output from the Raymarine AIS250 be output to a screen other than a Raymarine plotter? I've got the RL series radar and chartplotter which doesn't have AIS integration - so I need a cheapish screen that it can interface with. Any ideas?
Having said that, for the price, NASAs AIS radar is hard to ignore.
[/ QUOTE ]
Quite right, and for £219 I couldn't ignore it any longer and bought it today. I have an older radar so will mount it next to that screen as an additional source of info.
The Nasa Engine is well known not to meet the RS232 specs and therefore it is very difficult to run with a raymarine C or E series. An EasyAIS (not expensive either), together with an AIS-compatible multiplexer if necessary, is the best way to get AIS to a raymarine plotter. Dedicated VHF antenna or antenna splitter is a personal choice both having pros and cons.