Tidewaiter2
New member
The trouble with this list is it is so misleading (at least to the forumites who know these places) that it demeans every other article in the magazine.
The whole magazine ends up devalued as a consequence. If the article instead had canvassed 'readers' best ten waterside pubs it would be different.
Would you be 'more' or 'less' likely to buy the magazine as a result of this article?
Less would be my response.
+1, a piece of 'puff/freebie journalism', it appears to me. the MB for pity's sake- I have known crews go hungry and almost thirsty rather than go in