Daydream believer
Well-known member
He was aboard for two nights and we effectively did three days under examination.!
Three days under exam!! How long is the exam currently?
He was aboard for two nights and we effectively did three days under examination.!
I really don't see the problem. I took and passed my YM in 1996 or thereabouts from Oban in Febuary. The examiner (now deceased) so not named but notorious for his irascibility was an obnoxious sod. Nonetheless, he put me and my partner candidate through a very thorough exam over a whole weekend. He was aboard for two nights and we effectively did three days under examination. I always thought that his challenging demeanour was part of the exam.
If you are unhappy with the level of examination complain but if you are expecting a trip with the boys just get on with it!
For whatever reason MOB under sail is rarely, if ever examined -
Why on earth would you want to do that?thank you.
If it is normal for a candidate to be sent below to navigate without GPS, pretending that the boat is in fog, with only the depthsounder, compass & log allowed, then I think I'd probably refit the impeller & get a working display for it.
Or get some practice in with the Walker log ...
Why on earth would you want to do that?
Time * speed = distance.
And how do you know how fast you are going?
On the exam boats I've been on the examiner stated the speed that the helm had to move the boat at.And how do you know how fast you are going?
john_morris_uk - I was hoping someone like you might be lurking.
Is "blind nav" by a candidate at the discretion of the YM examiner?
Would you take a dim view of a candidate without an impellor log and a Walker log as backup to GPS?
For those familiar with Walker logs, is the streaming & handing of these devices impractical unless on a long offshore passage?
Too fiddly for a YM assessment in possibly congested waters?
But if only needed for "blind nav" then possibly only required to be streamed for a short time?
Lobster pots and floating lines are going to be a problem...?
On the exam boats I've been on the examiner stated the speed that the helm had to move the boat at.
Do you do it differently John?
john_morris_uk - I was hoping someone like you might be lurking.
Is "blind nav" by a candidate at the discretion of the YM examiner?
Would you take a dim view of a candidate without an impellor log and a Walker log as backup to GPS?
For those familiar with Walker logs, is the streaming & handing of these devices impractical unless on a long offshore passage?
Too fiddly for a YM assessment in possibly congested waters?
But if only needed for "blind nav" then possibly only required to be streamed for a short time?
Lobster pots and floating lines are going to be a problem...?
Thanks John, as ever a fully explained reasoning to your position on a topic.I sometimes wish I had the cheek to tell a candidate to go a bit quicker. However frustrating it is to want to lean on the throttle or advise the candidate, imho it’s not a good idea...
Two reasons why it’s not a good idea for an examiner to specify a speed.
Firstly it puts unnecessary pressure on the candidates. They’re supposed to conduct the boat safely and that includes ‘at a safe speed’. I suppose if a candidate was hopelessly slow you’d consider they lacked ability but that’s a judgement to be made on the ability under the particular circumstances of wind weather and visibility and navigational constraints.
Secondly there the whole question of safety and what happens if they hit something or stuff the boat aground in dangerous circumstances. Who is taking the rap? ‘The Examiner told me to go that fast isn’t a very convincing excuse and it doesn’t reflect well on the Examiner either.